Cargando…

What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever?

Patients with suspected enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever are predominantly managed as outpatients in endemic regions. Nonspecific clinical presentation, lack of accurate diagnostic tools, and widespread antimicrobial resistance makes management challenging. Resistance has been described for a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parry, Christopher M, Qamar, Farah N, Rijal, Samita, McCann, Naina, Baker, Stephen, Basnyat, Buddha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad179
_version_ 1785052942236123136
author Parry, Christopher M
Qamar, Farah N
Rijal, Samita
McCann, Naina
Baker, Stephen
Basnyat, Buddha
author_facet Parry, Christopher M
Qamar, Farah N
Rijal, Samita
McCann, Naina
Baker, Stephen
Basnyat, Buddha
author_sort Parry, Christopher M
collection PubMed
description Patients with suspected enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever are predominantly managed as outpatients in endemic regions. Nonspecific clinical presentation, lack of accurate diagnostic tools, and widespread antimicrobial resistance makes management challenging. Resistance has been described for all antimicrobials including chloramphenicol, amoxycillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and azithromycin. No significant differences have been demonstrated between these antimicrobials in their ability to treat enteric fever in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Antimicrobial choice should be guided by local resistance patterns and national guidance. Extensively drug-resistant typhoid isolates require treatment with azithromycin and/or meropenem. Combining antimicrobials that target intracellular and extracellular typhoid bacteria is a strategy being explored in the Azithromycin and Cefixime in Typhoid Fever (ACT-SA) RCT, in progress in South Asia. Alternative antimicrobials, such as the oral carbapenem, tebipenem, need clinical evaluation. There is a paucity of evidence to guide the antimicrobial management of chronic fecal carriers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10236504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102365042023-06-03 What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever? Parry, Christopher M Qamar, Farah N Rijal, Samita McCann, Naina Baker, Stephen Basnyat, Buddha Open Forum Infect Dis Charting the Course Supplement Patients with suspected enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever are predominantly managed as outpatients in endemic regions. Nonspecific clinical presentation, lack of accurate diagnostic tools, and widespread antimicrobial resistance makes management challenging. Resistance has been described for all antimicrobials including chloramphenicol, amoxycillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and azithromycin. No significant differences have been demonstrated between these antimicrobials in their ability to treat enteric fever in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Antimicrobial choice should be guided by local resistance patterns and national guidance. Extensively drug-resistant typhoid isolates require treatment with azithromycin and/or meropenem. Combining antimicrobials that target intracellular and extracellular typhoid bacteria is a strategy being explored in the Azithromycin and Cefixime in Typhoid Fever (ACT-SA) RCT, in progress in South Asia. Alternative antimicrobials, such as the oral carbapenem, tebipenem, need clinical evaluation. There is a paucity of evidence to guide the antimicrobial management of chronic fecal carriers. Oxford University Press 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10236504/ /pubmed/37274536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad179 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Charting the Course Supplement
Parry, Christopher M
Qamar, Farah N
Rijal, Samita
McCann, Naina
Baker, Stephen
Basnyat, Buddha
What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever?
title What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever?
title_full What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever?
title_fullStr What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever?
title_full_unstemmed What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever?
title_short What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever?
title_sort what should we be recommending for the treatment of enteric fever?
topic Charting the Course Supplement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad179
work_keys_str_mv AT parrychristopherm whatshouldweberecommendingforthetreatmentofentericfever
AT qamarfarahn whatshouldweberecommendingforthetreatmentofentericfever
AT rijalsamita whatshouldweberecommendingforthetreatmentofentericfever
AT mccannnaina whatshouldweberecommendingforthetreatmentofentericfever
AT bakerstephen whatshouldweberecommendingforthetreatmentofentericfever
AT basnyatbuddha whatshouldweberecommendingforthetreatmentofentericfever