Cargando…
What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever?
Patients with suspected enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever are predominantly managed as outpatients in endemic regions. Nonspecific clinical presentation, lack of accurate diagnostic tools, and widespread antimicrobial resistance makes management challenging. Resistance has been described for a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad179 |
_version_ | 1785052942236123136 |
---|---|
author | Parry, Christopher M Qamar, Farah N Rijal, Samita McCann, Naina Baker, Stephen Basnyat, Buddha |
author_facet | Parry, Christopher M Qamar, Farah N Rijal, Samita McCann, Naina Baker, Stephen Basnyat, Buddha |
author_sort | Parry, Christopher M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patients with suspected enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever are predominantly managed as outpatients in endemic regions. Nonspecific clinical presentation, lack of accurate diagnostic tools, and widespread antimicrobial resistance makes management challenging. Resistance has been described for all antimicrobials including chloramphenicol, amoxycillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and azithromycin. No significant differences have been demonstrated between these antimicrobials in their ability to treat enteric fever in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Antimicrobial choice should be guided by local resistance patterns and national guidance. Extensively drug-resistant typhoid isolates require treatment with azithromycin and/or meropenem. Combining antimicrobials that target intracellular and extracellular typhoid bacteria is a strategy being explored in the Azithromycin and Cefixime in Typhoid Fever (ACT-SA) RCT, in progress in South Asia. Alternative antimicrobials, such as the oral carbapenem, tebipenem, need clinical evaluation. There is a paucity of evidence to guide the antimicrobial management of chronic fecal carriers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10236504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102365042023-06-03 What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever? Parry, Christopher M Qamar, Farah N Rijal, Samita McCann, Naina Baker, Stephen Basnyat, Buddha Open Forum Infect Dis Charting the Course Supplement Patients with suspected enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever are predominantly managed as outpatients in endemic regions. Nonspecific clinical presentation, lack of accurate diagnostic tools, and widespread antimicrobial resistance makes management challenging. Resistance has been described for all antimicrobials including chloramphenicol, amoxycillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and azithromycin. No significant differences have been demonstrated between these antimicrobials in their ability to treat enteric fever in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Antimicrobial choice should be guided by local resistance patterns and national guidance. Extensively drug-resistant typhoid isolates require treatment with azithromycin and/or meropenem. Combining antimicrobials that target intracellular and extracellular typhoid bacteria is a strategy being explored in the Azithromycin and Cefixime in Typhoid Fever (ACT-SA) RCT, in progress in South Asia. Alternative antimicrobials, such as the oral carbapenem, tebipenem, need clinical evaluation. There is a paucity of evidence to guide the antimicrobial management of chronic fecal carriers. Oxford University Press 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10236504/ /pubmed/37274536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad179 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Charting the Course Supplement Parry, Christopher M Qamar, Farah N Rijal, Samita McCann, Naina Baker, Stephen Basnyat, Buddha What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever? |
title | What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever? |
title_full | What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever? |
title_fullStr | What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever? |
title_full_unstemmed | What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever? |
title_short | What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever? |
title_sort | what should we be recommending for the treatment of enteric fever? |
topic | Charting the Course Supplement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parrychristopherm whatshouldweberecommendingforthetreatmentofentericfever AT qamarfarahn whatshouldweberecommendingforthetreatmentofentericfever AT rijalsamita whatshouldweberecommendingforthetreatmentofentericfever AT mccannnaina whatshouldweberecommendingforthetreatmentofentericfever AT bakerstephen whatshouldweberecommendingforthetreatmentofentericfever AT basnyatbuddha whatshouldweberecommendingforthetreatmentofentericfever |