Cargando…

Clinician Responses to Pediatric Lipid Screens Suggestive of Severe Dyslipidemia

OBJECTIVES: To measure case detection and response time of severe pediatric dyslipidemia, defined as non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ≥190 mg/dL on the initial screening panel. Although low adherence to guidelines recommending universal pediatric lipid screening is well-documented, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zawacki, Amy W., Enright, Connor, Harris, Rachel E., Dodge, Ann, Peterson, Amy L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympdx.2020.100037
_version_ 1785052959015436288
author Zawacki, Amy W.
Enright, Connor
Harris, Rachel E.
Dodge, Ann
Peterson, Amy L.
author_facet Zawacki, Amy W.
Enright, Connor
Harris, Rachel E.
Dodge, Ann
Peterson, Amy L.
author_sort Zawacki, Amy W.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To measure case detection and response time of severe pediatric dyslipidemia, defined as non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ≥190 mg/dL on the initial screening panel. Although low adherence to guidelines recommending universal pediatric lipid screening is well-documented, it is unknown how clinicians respond to pediatric lipid screening results suggestive of severe dyslipidemia. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a single-institution, retrospective review of patients 0-18 years of age with initial lipid panels completed from January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2018. A chart review was conducted on all patients with non-HDL-C ≥190 mg/dL to determine indication(s) for the initial lipid panel, specialty of ordering clinician, type of action taken to an abnormal result (repeat laboratory tests, treatment, and/or referral), time from result to clinician action, and diagnosis. RESULTS: There were 16 860 initial lipid panels that met the inclusion criteria; 178 (1.1%) had non-HDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, indicating severe dyslipidemia. The most common indication for screening was universal screening (52%). For all lipid panels with non-HDL ≥190 mg/dL, a clinician action was documented for 47% within 7 days and 69% within 30 days. No follow-up action was documented in 18 (9%). A clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia was the most common diagnosis, in 24% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of lipid panels with non-HDL-C ≥190 mg/dL had some action documented, although the actions varied. Universal screening was the most common indication for testing, clarifying its significance in identifying severe dyslipidemia. Further education and improved management protocols may help responses to severe dyslipidemia in children at high risk for premature cardiovascular disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10236550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102365502023-06-16 Clinician Responses to Pediatric Lipid Screens Suggestive of Severe Dyslipidemia Zawacki, Amy W. Enright, Connor Harris, Rachel E. Dodge, Ann Peterson, Amy L. J Pediatr X Original Article OBJECTIVES: To measure case detection and response time of severe pediatric dyslipidemia, defined as non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ≥190 mg/dL on the initial screening panel. Although low adherence to guidelines recommending universal pediatric lipid screening is well-documented, it is unknown how clinicians respond to pediatric lipid screening results suggestive of severe dyslipidemia. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a single-institution, retrospective review of patients 0-18 years of age with initial lipid panels completed from January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2018. A chart review was conducted on all patients with non-HDL-C ≥190 mg/dL to determine indication(s) for the initial lipid panel, specialty of ordering clinician, type of action taken to an abnormal result (repeat laboratory tests, treatment, and/or referral), time from result to clinician action, and diagnosis. RESULTS: There were 16 860 initial lipid panels that met the inclusion criteria; 178 (1.1%) had non-HDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, indicating severe dyslipidemia. The most common indication for screening was universal screening (52%). For all lipid panels with non-HDL ≥190 mg/dL, a clinician action was documented for 47% within 7 days and 69% within 30 days. No follow-up action was documented in 18 (9%). A clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia was the most common diagnosis, in 24% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of lipid panels with non-HDL-C ≥190 mg/dL had some action documented, although the actions varied. Universal screening was the most common indication for testing, clarifying its significance in identifying severe dyslipidemia. Further education and improved management protocols may help responses to severe dyslipidemia in children at high risk for premature cardiovascular disease. Elsevier 2020-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10236550/ /pubmed/37334253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympdx.2020.100037 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Zawacki, Amy W.
Enright, Connor
Harris, Rachel E.
Dodge, Ann
Peterson, Amy L.
Clinician Responses to Pediatric Lipid Screens Suggestive of Severe Dyslipidemia
title Clinician Responses to Pediatric Lipid Screens Suggestive of Severe Dyslipidemia
title_full Clinician Responses to Pediatric Lipid Screens Suggestive of Severe Dyslipidemia
title_fullStr Clinician Responses to Pediatric Lipid Screens Suggestive of Severe Dyslipidemia
title_full_unstemmed Clinician Responses to Pediatric Lipid Screens Suggestive of Severe Dyslipidemia
title_short Clinician Responses to Pediatric Lipid Screens Suggestive of Severe Dyslipidemia
title_sort clinician responses to pediatric lipid screens suggestive of severe dyslipidemia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37334253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympdx.2020.100037
work_keys_str_mv AT zawackiamyw clinicianresponsestopediatriclipidscreenssuggestiveofseveredyslipidemia
AT enrightconnor clinicianresponsestopediatriclipidscreenssuggestiveofseveredyslipidemia
AT harrisrachele clinicianresponsestopediatriclipidscreenssuggestiveofseveredyslipidemia
AT dodgeann clinicianresponsestopediatriclipidscreenssuggestiveofseveredyslipidemia
AT petersonamyl clinicianresponsestopediatriclipidscreenssuggestiveofseveredyslipidemia