Cargando…

The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Given the reduced immune response to vaccines in older populations, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccinations and its impact on breakthrough infection, hospital admission, and mortality in the elderly. METHODS: We carried out a systemic review and meta-analysis w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Xiu Hong, Bao, Wen Jing, Zhang, Hua, Fu, Shun Kun, Jin, Hui Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37266884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08254-9
_version_ 1785053081012011008
author Yang, Xiu Hong
Bao, Wen Jing
Zhang, Hua
Fu, Shun Kun
Jin, Hui Min
author_facet Yang, Xiu Hong
Bao, Wen Jing
Zhang, Hua
Fu, Shun Kun
Jin, Hui Min
author_sort Yang, Xiu Hong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Given the reduced immune response to vaccines in older populations, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccinations and its impact on breakthrough infection, hospital admission, and mortality in the elderly. METHODS: We carried out a systemic review and meta-analysis where MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials were queried to identify relevant literature. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized trials, prospective, observational cohort, and case–control studies assessing breakthrough infection, hospital admission, and mortality after coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in the elderly (≥ 60 years old). RESULTS: Overall, 26 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the unvaccinated group, the vaccinated group showed a decreased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection after 28–34 (relative risk [RR] = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–0.49) and 35–60 days (RR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.37–0.62). There was a step-wise increase in efficacy with additional doses with the two-dose group experiencing decreased risk of breakthrough infection (RR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.32–0.42), hospital admissions (RR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.14–0.45), disease severity (RR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.20–0.70), and mortality (RR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.14–0.32) compared with those receiving one or no doses. Similarly three-dose and four-dose vaccine groups also showed a decreased risk of breakthrough infection (3-dose: RR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.10–0.20; 4-dose RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.4–0.53), hospital admissions (3-dose: RR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.07–0.17; 4-dose: RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.32–0.55), and all-cause mortality (3-dose: RR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.02–0.48; 4-dose: RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.28–0.84) Subgroup analysis found that protection against mortality for vaccinated vs. unvaccinated groups was similar by age (60–79 years: RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47–0.74; ≥ 80 years: RR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59–0.98) and gender (female: RR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50–0.87, male: (RR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44–0.76), and comorbid cardiovascular disease (CVD) (RR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52–0.92) or diabetes (DM) (RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39–0.89. CONCLUSIONS: Our pooled results showed that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines administered to the elderly is effective in preventing prevent breakthrough infection, hospitalization, severity, and death. What’s more, increasing number of vaccine doses is becoming increasingly effective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08254-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10237071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102370712023-06-06 The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis Yang, Xiu Hong Bao, Wen Jing Zhang, Hua Fu, Shun Kun Jin, Hui Min J Gen Intern Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Given the reduced immune response to vaccines in older populations, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccinations and its impact on breakthrough infection, hospital admission, and mortality in the elderly. METHODS: We carried out a systemic review and meta-analysis where MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials were queried to identify relevant literature. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized trials, prospective, observational cohort, and case–control studies assessing breakthrough infection, hospital admission, and mortality after coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in the elderly (≥ 60 years old). RESULTS: Overall, 26 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the unvaccinated group, the vaccinated group showed a decreased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection after 28–34 (relative risk [RR] = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–0.49) and 35–60 days (RR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.37–0.62). There was a step-wise increase in efficacy with additional doses with the two-dose group experiencing decreased risk of breakthrough infection (RR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.32–0.42), hospital admissions (RR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.14–0.45), disease severity (RR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.20–0.70), and mortality (RR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.14–0.32) compared with those receiving one or no doses. Similarly three-dose and four-dose vaccine groups also showed a decreased risk of breakthrough infection (3-dose: RR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.10–0.20; 4-dose RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.4–0.53), hospital admissions (3-dose: RR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.07–0.17; 4-dose: RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.32–0.55), and all-cause mortality (3-dose: RR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.02–0.48; 4-dose: RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.28–0.84) Subgroup analysis found that protection against mortality for vaccinated vs. unvaccinated groups was similar by age (60–79 years: RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47–0.74; ≥ 80 years: RR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59–0.98) and gender (female: RR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50–0.87, male: (RR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44–0.76), and comorbid cardiovascular disease (CVD) (RR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52–0.92) or diabetes (DM) (RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39–0.89. CONCLUSIONS: Our pooled results showed that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines administered to the elderly is effective in preventing prevent breakthrough infection, hospitalization, severity, and death. What’s more, increasing number of vaccine doses is becoming increasingly effective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08254-9. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10237071/ /pubmed/37266884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08254-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Yang, Xiu Hong
Bao, Wen Jing
Zhang, Hua
Fu, Shun Kun
Jin, Hui Min
The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
title The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of sars-cov-2 vaccination in the elderly: a systemic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37266884
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08254-9
work_keys_str_mv AT yangxiuhong theefficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baowenjing theefficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanghua theefficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fushunkun theefficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinhuimin theefficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangxiuhong efficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baowenjing efficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanghua efficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fushunkun efficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinhuimin efficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis