Cargando…
The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Given the reduced immune response to vaccines in older populations, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccinations and its impact on breakthrough infection, hospital admission, and mortality in the elderly. METHODS: We carried out a systemic review and meta-analysis w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37266884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08254-9 |
_version_ | 1785053081012011008 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Xiu Hong Bao, Wen Jing Zhang, Hua Fu, Shun Kun Jin, Hui Min |
author_facet | Yang, Xiu Hong Bao, Wen Jing Zhang, Hua Fu, Shun Kun Jin, Hui Min |
author_sort | Yang, Xiu Hong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Given the reduced immune response to vaccines in older populations, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccinations and its impact on breakthrough infection, hospital admission, and mortality in the elderly. METHODS: We carried out a systemic review and meta-analysis where MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials were queried to identify relevant literature. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized trials, prospective, observational cohort, and case–control studies assessing breakthrough infection, hospital admission, and mortality after coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in the elderly (≥ 60 years old). RESULTS: Overall, 26 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the unvaccinated group, the vaccinated group showed a decreased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection after 28–34 (relative risk [RR] = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–0.49) and 35–60 days (RR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.37–0.62). There was a step-wise increase in efficacy with additional doses with the two-dose group experiencing decreased risk of breakthrough infection (RR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.32–0.42), hospital admissions (RR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.14–0.45), disease severity (RR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.20–0.70), and mortality (RR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.14–0.32) compared with those receiving one or no doses. Similarly three-dose and four-dose vaccine groups also showed a decreased risk of breakthrough infection (3-dose: RR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.10–0.20; 4-dose RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.4–0.53), hospital admissions (3-dose: RR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.07–0.17; 4-dose: RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.32–0.55), and all-cause mortality (3-dose: RR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.02–0.48; 4-dose: RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.28–0.84) Subgroup analysis found that protection against mortality for vaccinated vs. unvaccinated groups was similar by age (60–79 years: RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47–0.74; ≥ 80 years: RR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59–0.98) and gender (female: RR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50–0.87, male: (RR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44–0.76), and comorbid cardiovascular disease (CVD) (RR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52–0.92) or diabetes (DM) (RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39–0.89. CONCLUSIONS: Our pooled results showed that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines administered to the elderly is effective in preventing prevent breakthrough infection, hospitalization, severity, and death. What’s more, increasing number of vaccine doses is becoming increasingly effective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08254-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10237071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102370712023-06-06 The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis Yang, Xiu Hong Bao, Wen Jing Zhang, Hua Fu, Shun Kun Jin, Hui Min J Gen Intern Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Given the reduced immune response to vaccines in older populations, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccinations and its impact on breakthrough infection, hospital admission, and mortality in the elderly. METHODS: We carried out a systemic review and meta-analysis where MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials were queried to identify relevant literature. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized trials, prospective, observational cohort, and case–control studies assessing breakthrough infection, hospital admission, and mortality after coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in the elderly (≥ 60 years old). RESULTS: Overall, 26 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the unvaccinated group, the vaccinated group showed a decreased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection after 28–34 (relative risk [RR] = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–0.49) and 35–60 days (RR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.37–0.62). There was a step-wise increase in efficacy with additional doses with the two-dose group experiencing decreased risk of breakthrough infection (RR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.32–0.42), hospital admissions (RR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.14–0.45), disease severity (RR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.20–0.70), and mortality (RR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.14–0.32) compared with those receiving one or no doses. Similarly three-dose and four-dose vaccine groups also showed a decreased risk of breakthrough infection (3-dose: RR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.10–0.20; 4-dose RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.4–0.53), hospital admissions (3-dose: RR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.07–0.17; 4-dose: RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.32–0.55), and all-cause mortality (3-dose: RR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.02–0.48; 4-dose: RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.28–0.84) Subgroup analysis found that protection against mortality for vaccinated vs. unvaccinated groups was similar by age (60–79 years: RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47–0.74; ≥ 80 years: RR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59–0.98) and gender (female: RR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50–0.87, male: (RR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44–0.76), and comorbid cardiovascular disease (CVD) (RR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52–0.92) or diabetes (DM) (RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39–0.89. CONCLUSIONS: Our pooled results showed that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines administered to the elderly is effective in preventing prevent breakthrough infection, hospitalization, severity, and death. What’s more, increasing number of vaccine doses is becoming increasingly effective. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08254-9. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10237071/ /pubmed/37266884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08254-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Yang, Xiu Hong Bao, Wen Jing Zhang, Hua Fu, Shun Kun Jin, Hui Min The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | The Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of sars-cov-2 vaccination in the elderly: a systemic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37266884 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08254-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangxiuhong theefficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baowenjing theefficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanghua theefficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fushunkun theefficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jinhuimin theefficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangxiuhong efficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baowenjing efficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanghua efficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fushunkun efficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jinhuimin efficacyofsarscov2vaccinationintheelderlyasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis |