Cargando…

Non-adherence and non-persistence to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections play a key role in treating a range of macular diseases. The effectiveness of these therapies is dependent on patients’ adherence (the extent to which a patient takes their medicines as per agreed recommendations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shahzad, Haris, Mahmood, Sajid, McGee, Sean, Hubbard, Jessica, Haque, Sayeed, Paudyal, Vibhu, Denniston, Alastair K., Hill, Lisa J., Jalal, Zahraa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37269003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02261-x
_version_ 1785053083374452736
author Shahzad, Haris
Mahmood, Sajid
McGee, Sean
Hubbard, Jessica
Haque, Sayeed
Paudyal, Vibhu
Denniston, Alastair K.
Hill, Lisa J.
Jalal, Zahraa
author_facet Shahzad, Haris
Mahmood, Sajid
McGee, Sean
Hubbard, Jessica
Haque, Sayeed
Paudyal, Vibhu
Denniston, Alastair K.
Hill, Lisa J.
Jalal, Zahraa
author_sort Shahzad, Haris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections play a key role in treating a range of macular diseases. The effectiveness of these therapies is dependent on patients’ adherence (the extent to which a patient takes their medicines as per agreed recommendations from the healthcare provider) and persistence (continuation of the treatment for the prescribed duration) to their prescribed treatment regimens. The aim of this systematic review was to demonstrate the need for further investigation into the prevalence of, and factors contributing to, patient-led non-adherence and non-persistence, thus facilitating improved clinical outcomes. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library. Studies in English conducted before February 2023 that reported the level of, and/or barriers to, non-adherence or non-persistence to intravitreal anti-VEGF ocular disease therapy were included. Duplicate papers, literature reviews, expert opinion articles, case studies, and case series were excluded following screening by two independent authors. RESULTS: Data from a total of 409,215 patients across 52 studies were analysed. Treatment regimens included pro re nata, monthly and treat-and-extend protocols; study durations ranged from 4 months to 8 years. Of the 52 studies, 22 included a breakdown of reasons for patient non-adherence/non-persistence. Patient-led non-adherence varied between 17.5 and 35.0% depending on the definition used. Overall pooled prevalence of patient-led treatment non-persistence was 30.0% (P = 0.000). Reasons for non-adherence/non-persistence included dissatisfaction with treatment results (29.9%), financial burden (19%), older age/comorbidities (15.5%), difficulty booking appointments (8.5%), travel distance/social isolation (7.9%), lack of time (5.8%), satisfaction with the perceived improvement in their condition (4.4%), fear of injection (4.0%), loss of motivation (4.0%), apathy towards eyesight (2.5%), dissatisfaction with facilities 2.3%, and discomfort/pain (0.3%). Three studies found non-adherence rates between 51.6 and 68.8% during the COVID-19 pandemic, in part due to fear of exposure to COVID-19 and difficulties travelling during lockdown. DISCUSSION: Results suggest high levels of patient-led non-adherence/non-persistence to anti-VEGF therapy, mostly due to dissatisfaction with treatment results, a combination of comorbidities, loss of motivation and the burden of travel. This study provides key information on prevalence and factors contributing to non-adherence/non-persistence in anti-VEGF treatment for macular diseases, aiding identification of at-risk individuals to improve real-world visual outcomes. Improvements in the literature can be achieved by establishing uniform definitions and standard timescales for what constitutes non-adherence/non-persistence. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020216205. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02261-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10237080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102370802023-06-04 Non-adherence and non-persistence to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Shahzad, Haris Mahmood, Sajid McGee, Sean Hubbard, Jessica Haque, Sayeed Paudyal, Vibhu Denniston, Alastair K. Hill, Lisa J. Jalal, Zahraa Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections play a key role in treating a range of macular diseases. The effectiveness of these therapies is dependent on patients’ adherence (the extent to which a patient takes their medicines as per agreed recommendations from the healthcare provider) and persistence (continuation of the treatment for the prescribed duration) to their prescribed treatment regimens. The aim of this systematic review was to demonstrate the need for further investigation into the prevalence of, and factors contributing to, patient-led non-adherence and non-persistence, thus facilitating improved clinical outcomes. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library. Studies in English conducted before February 2023 that reported the level of, and/or barriers to, non-adherence or non-persistence to intravitreal anti-VEGF ocular disease therapy were included. Duplicate papers, literature reviews, expert opinion articles, case studies, and case series were excluded following screening by two independent authors. RESULTS: Data from a total of 409,215 patients across 52 studies were analysed. Treatment regimens included pro re nata, monthly and treat-and-extend protocols; study durations ranged from 4 months to 8 years. Of the 52 studies, 22 included a breakdown of reasons for patient non-adherence/non-persistence. Patient-led non-adherence varied between 17.5 and 35.0% depending on the definition used. Overall pooled prevalence of patient-led treatment non-persistence was 30.0% (P = 0.000). Reasons for non-adherence/non-persistence included dissatisfaction with treatment results (29.9%), financial burden (19%), older age/comorbidities (15.5%), difficulty booking appointments (8.5%), travel distance/social isolation (7.9%), lack of time (5.8%), satisfaction with the perceived improvement in their condition (4.4%), fear of injection (4.0%), loss of motivation (4.0%), apathy towards eyesight (2.5%), dissatisfaction with facilities 2.3%, and discomfort/pain (0.3%). Three studies found non-adherence rates between 51.6 and 68.8% during the COVID-19 pandemic, in part due to fear of exposure to COVID-19 and difficulties travelling during lockdown. DISCUSSION: Results suggest high levels of patient-led non-adherence/non-persistence to anti-VEGF therapy, mostly due to dissatisfaction with treatment results, a combination of comorbidities, loss of motivation and the burden of travel. This study provides key information on prevalence and factors contributing to non-adherence/non-persistence in anti-VEGF treatment for macular diseases, aiding identification of at-risk individuals to improve real-world visual outcomes. Improvements in the literature can be achieved by establishing uniform definitions and standard timescales for what constitutes non-adherence/non-persistence. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020216205. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-023-02261-x. BioMed Central 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10237080/ /pubmed/37269003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02261-x Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Shahzad, Haris
Mahmood, Sajid
McGee, Sean
Hubbard, Jessica
Haque, Sayeed
Paudyal, Vibhu
Denniston, Alastair K.
Hill, Lisa J.
Jalal, Zahraa
Non-adherence and non-persistence to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Non-adherence and non-persistence to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Non-adherence and non-persistence to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Non-adherence and non-persistence to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Non-adherence and non-persistence to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Non-adherence and non-persistence to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort non-adherence and non-persistence to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-vegf) therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37269003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02261-x
work_keys_str_mv AT shahzadharis nonadherenceandnonpersistencetointravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactorantivegftherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mahmoodsajid nonadherenceandnonpersistencetointravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactorantivegftherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mcgeesean nonadherenceandnonpersistencetointravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactorantivegftherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hubbardjessica nonadherenceandnonpersistencetointravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactorantivegftherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haquesayeed nonadherenceandnonpersistencetointravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactorantivegftherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT paudyalvibhu nonadherenceandnonpersistencetointravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactorantivegftherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dennistonalastairk nonadherenceandnonpersistencetointravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactorantivegftherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hilllisaj nonadherenceandnonpersistencetointravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactorantivegftherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jalalzahraa nonadherenceandnonpersistencetointravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactorantivegftherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis