Cargando…
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples yield adequate DNA for next-generation sequencing: A cohort analysis
BACKGROUND: Genetic tests are increasingly performed for the management of unresectable pancreatic cancer. For genotyping aimed samples current guidelines recommend using core specimens, although based on moderate quality evidence. However, in clinical practice among the endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i18.2864 |
_version_ | 1785053089794883584 |
---|---|
author | Bunduc, Stefania Varzaru, Bianca Iacob, Razvan Andrei Sorop, Andrei Manea, Ioana Spiridon, Andreea Chelaru, Raluca Croitoru, Adina Emilia Becheanu, Gabriel Dumbrava, Mona Dima, Simona Popescu, Irinel Gheorghe, Cristian |
author_facet | Bunduc, Stefania Varzaru, Bianca Iacob, Razvan Andrei Sorop, Andrei Manea, Ioana Spiridon, Andreea Chelaru, Raluca Croitoru, Adina Emilia Becheanu, Gabriel Dumbrava, Mona Dima, Simona Popescu, Irinel Gheorghe, Cristian |
author_sort | Bunduc, Stefania |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genetic tests are increasingly performed for the management of unresectable pancreatic cancer. For genotyping aimed samples current guidelines recommend using core specimens, although based on moderate quality evidence. However, in clinical practice among the endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided tissue acquisition methods, fine needle aspiration (FNA) is the most widely performed. AIM: To assess the adequacy for next generation sequencing (NGS) of the DNA yielded from EUS-FNA pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) samples. METHODS: Between November 2018 and December 2021, 105 patients with PDAC confirmed by EUS-FNA were included in the study at our tertiary gastroenterology center. Either 22 gauge (G) or 19G FNA needles were used. One pass was dedicated to DNA extraction. DNA concentration and purity (A260/280, A260/230) were assessed by spectrophotometry. We assessed the differences in DNA parameters according to needle size and tumor characteristics (size, location) and the adequacy of the extracted DNA for NGS (defined as A260/280 ≥ 1.7, and DNA yield: ≥ 10 ng for amplicon based NGS, ≥ 50 ng for whole exome sequencing [WES], ≥ 100 ng for whole genome sequencing [WGS]) by analysis of variance and t-test respectively. Moreover, we compared DNA purity parameters across the different DNA yield categories. RESULTS: Our cohort included 49% male patients, aged 67.02 ± 8.38 years. The 22G needle was used in 71% of the cases. The DNA parameters across our samples varied as follows: DNA yield: 1289 ng (inter quartile range: 534.75-3101), A260/280 = 1.85 (1.79-1.86), A260/230 = 2.2 (1.72-2.36). DNA yield was > 10 ng in all samples and > 100 ng in 93% of them (one sample < 50 ng). There were no significant differences in the concentration and A260/280 between samples by needle size. Needle size was the only independent predictor of A260/230 which was higher in the 22G samples (P = 0.038). NGS adequacy rate was 90% for 19G samples regardless of NGS type, and for 22G samples it reached 89% for WGS adequacy and 91% for WES and amplicon based NGS. Samples with DNA yield > 100 ng had significantly higher A260/280 (1.89 ± 0.32 vs 1.34 ± 0.42, P = 0.013). Tumor characteristics were not corelated with the DNA parameters. CONCLUSION: EUS-FNA PDAC samples yield DNA adequate for subsequent NGS. DNA amount was similar between 22G and 19G FNA needles. DNA purity parameters may vary indirectly with needle size. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10237110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102371102023-06-03 Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples yield adequate DNA for next-generation sequencing: A cohort analysis Bunduc, Stefania Varzaru, Bianca Iacob, Razvan Andrei Sorop, Andrei Manea, Ioana Spiridon, Andreea Chelaru, Raluca Croitoru, Adina Emilia Becheanu, Gabriel Dumbrava, Mona Dima, Simona Popescu, Irinel Gheorghe, Cristian World J Gastroenterol Observational Study BACKGROUND: Genetic tests are increasingly performed for the management of unresectable pancreatic cancer. For genotyping aimed samples current guidelines recommend using core specimens, although based on moderate quality evidence. However, in clinical practice among the endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided tissue acquisition methods, fine needle aspiration (FNA) is the most widely performed. AIM: To assess the adequacy for next generation sequencing (NGS) of the DNA yielded from EUS-FNA pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) samples. METHODS: Between November 2018 and December 2021, 105 patients with PDAC confirmed by EUS-FNA were included in the study at our tertiary gastroenterology center. Either 22 gauge (G) or 19G FNA needles were used. One pass was dedicated to DNA extraction. DNA concentration and purity (A260/280, A260/230) were assessed by spectrophotometry. We assessed the differences in DNA parameters according to needle size and tumor characteristics (size, location) and the adequacy of the extracted DNA for NGS (defined as A260/280 ≥ 1.7, and DNA yield: ≥ 10 ng for amplicon based NGS, ≥ 50 ng for whole exome sequencing [WES], ≥ 100 ng for whole genome sequencing [WGS]) by analysis of variance and t-test respectively. Moreover, we compared DNA purity parameters across the different DNA yield categories. RESULTS: Our cohort included 49% male patients, aged 67.02 ± 8.38 years. The 22G needle was used in 71% of the cases. The DNA parameters across our samples varied as follows: DNA yield: 1289 ng (inter quartile range: 534.75-3101), A260/280 = 1.85 (1.79-1.86), A260/230 = 2.2 (1.72-2.36). DNA yield was > 10 ng in all samples and > 100 ng in 93% of them (one sample < 50 ng). There were no significant differences in the concentration and A260/280 between samples by needle size. Needle size was the only independent predictor of A260/230 which was higher in the 22G samples (P = 0.038). NGS adequacy rate was 90% for 19G samples regardless of NGS type, and for 22G samples it reached 89% for WGS adequacy and 91% for WES and amplicon based NGS. Samples with DNA yield > 100 ng had significantly higher A260/280 (1.89 ± 0.32 vs 1.34 ± 0.42, P = 0.013). Tumor characteristics were not corelated with the DNA parameters. CONCLUSION: EUS-FNA PDAC samples yield DNA adequate for subsequent NGS. DNA amount was similar between 22G and 19G FNA needles. DNA purity parameters may vary indirectly with needle size. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-05-14 2023-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10237110/ /pubmed/37274073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i18.2864 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Observational Study Bunduc, Stefania Varzaru, Bianca Iacob, Razvan Andrei Sorop, Andrei Manea, Ioana Spiridon, Andreea Chelaru, Raluca Croitoru, Adina Emilia Becheanu, Gabriel Dumbrava, Mona Dima, Simona Popescu, Irinel Gheorghe, Cristian Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples yield adequate DNA for next-generation sequencing: A cohort analysis |
title | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples yield adequate DNA for next-generation sequencing: A cohort analysis |
title_full | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples yield adequate DNA for next-generation sequencing: A cohort analysis |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples yield adequate DNA for next-generation sequencing: A cohort analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples yield adequate DNA for next-generation sequencing: A cohort analysis |
title_short | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples yield adequate DNA for next-generation sequencing: A cohort analysis |
title_sort | endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples yield adequate dna for next-generation sequencing: a cohort analysis |
topic | Observational Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i18.2864 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bunducstefania endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationpancreaticadenocarcinomasamplesyieldadequatednafornextgenerationsequencingacohortanalysis AT varzarubianca endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationpancreaticadenocarcinomasamplesyieldadequatednafornextgenerationsequencingacohortanalysis AT iacobrazvanandrei endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationpancreaticadenocarcinomasamplesyieldadequatednafornextgenerationsequencingacohortanalysis AT soropandrei endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationpancreaticadenocarcinomasamplesyieldadequatednafornextgenerationsequencingacohortanalysis AT maneaioana endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationpancreaticadenocarcinomasamplesyieldadequatednafornextgenerationsequencingacohortanalysis AT spiridonandreea endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationpancreaticadenocarcinomasamplesyieldadequatednafornextgenerationsequencingacohortanalysis AT chelaruraluca endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationpancreaticadenocarcinomasamplesyieldadequatednafornextgenerationsequencingacohortanalysis AT croitoruadinaemilia endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationpancreaticadenocarcinomasamplesyieldadequatednafornextgenerationsequencingacohortanalysis AT becheanugabriel endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationpancreaticadenocarcinomasamplesyieldadequatednafornextgenerationsequencingacohortanalysis AT dumbravamona endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationpancreaticadenocarcinomasamplesyieldadequatednafornextgenerationsequencingacohortanalysis AT dimasimona endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationpancreaticadenocarcinomasamplesyieldadequatednafornextgenerationsequencingacohortanalysis AT popescuirinel endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationpancreaticadenocarcinomasamplesyieldadequatednafornextgenerationsequencingacohortanalysis AT gheorghecristian endoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationpancreaticadenocarcinomasamplesyieldadequatednafornextgenerationsequencingacohortanalysis |