Cargando…

Impact of the implementation of Identification-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR) tool to improve quality and safety measure in a lithotripsy and endourological unit

INTRODUCTION: A lack of professional communication and collaboration may be one of the main causes of medication errors. The objective was to evaluate the results of the implementation of ISBAR as a communication and safety tool in a Lithotripsy and Endourologic Unit of a tertiary public hospital. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gadea-Company, Patricia, Casal Angulo, Carmen, Hurtado Navarro, Clara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37267290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286565
_version_ 1785053142397747200
author Gadea-Company, Patricia
Casal Angulo, Carmen
Hurtado Navarro, Clara
author_facet Gadea-Company, Patricia
Casal Angulo, Carmen
Hurtado Navarro, Clara
author_sort Gadea-Company, Patricia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A lack of professional communication and collaboration may be one of the main causes of medication errors. The objective was to evaluate the results of the implementation of ISBAR as a communication and safety tool in a Lithotripsy and Endourologic Unit of a tertiary public hospital. METHODS: A total of 457 patients were included in a retrospective study from 2014 to 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (357 patients) in which an endourological procedure was performed before march of 2018 (without the implementation of ISBAR tool) and Group B (100 patients) with the implementation of ISBAR tool. The inclusion criteria were patients accepted for surgical intervention by anaesthesiology Department and operated in the period of the study. The variables analysed included number of procedures, global, intraoperative and postoperative complications rate, urinary infection or sepsis, NPR (FMEA), percentage of suspended surgical patients and hospital stay. RESULTS: The postoperative complications showed no significant differences between groups, but a trend to diminishing was seen in the complication in the group B. The sepsis reduced its incidence and it was close to significant difference. The operative time was shorter in group B 119,11min (114,63–123,59) vs 115,11min (109,63–121,67) p = 0,3. The reduction in the main postoperative complication (sepsis) explained the lower hospital stay for group B. The severe adverse events detected were reduced completely. CONCLUSIONS: ISBAR tool was an effective patient safety tool improving quality care. To provide safe patient care and improving quality is indispensable an effective communication flow.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10237371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102373712023-06-03 Impact of the implementation of Identification-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR) tool to improve quality and safety measure in a lithotripsy and endourological unit Gadea-Company, Patricia Casal Angulo, Carmen Hurtado Navarro, Clara PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: A lack of professional communication and collaboration may be one of the main causes of medication errors. The objective was to evaluate the results of the implementation of ISBAR as a communication and safety tool in a Lithotripsy and Endourologic Unit of a tertiary public hospital. METHODS: A total of 457 patients were included in a retrospective study from 2014 to 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (357 patients) in which an endourological procedure was performed before march of 2018 (without the implementation of ISBAR tool) and Group B (100 patients) with the implementation of ISBAR tool. The inclusion criteria were patients accepted for surgical intervention by anaesthesiology Department and operated in the period of the study. The variables analysed included number of procedures, global, intraoperative and postoperative complications rate, urinary infection or sepsis, NPR (FMEA), percentage of suspended surgical patients and hospital stay. RESULTS: The postoperative complications showed no significant differences between groups, but a trend to diminishing was seen in the complication in the group B. The sepsis reduced its incidence and it was close to significant difference. The operative time was shorter in group B 119,11min (114,63–123,59) vs 115,11min (109,63–121,67) p = 0,3. The reduction in the main postoperative complication (sepsis) explained the lower hospital stay for group B. The severe adverse events detected were reduced completely. CONCLUSIONS: ISBAR tool was an effective patient safety tool improving quality care. To provide safe patient care and improving quality is indispensable an effective communication flow. Public Library of Science 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10237371/ /pubmed/37267290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286565 Text en © 2023 Gadea-Company et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gadea-Company, Patricia
Casal Angulo, Carmen
Hurtado Navarro, Clara
Impact of the implementation of Identification-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR) tool to improve quality and safety measure in a lithotripsy and endourological unit
title Impact of the implementation of Identification-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR) tool to improve quality and safety measure in a lithotripsy and endourological unit
title_full Impact of the implementation of Identification-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR) tool to improve quality and safety measure in a lithotripsy and endourological unit
title_fullStr Impact of the implementation of Identification-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR) tool to improve quality and safety measure in a lithotripsy and endourological unit
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the implementation of Identification-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR) tool to improve quality and safety measure in a lithotripsy and endourological unit
title_short Impact of the implementation of Identification-Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (ISBAR) tool to improve quality and safety measure in a lithotripsy and endourological unit
title_sort impact of the implementation of identification-situation-background-assessment-recommendation (isbar) tool to improve quality and safety measure in a lithotripsy and endourological unit
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37267290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286565
work_keys_str_mv AT gadeacompanypatricia impactoftheimplementationofidentificationsituationbackgroundassessmentrecommendationisbartooltoimprovequalityandsafetymeasureinalithotripsyandendourologicalunit
AT casalangulocarmen impactoftheimplementationofidentificationsituationbackgroundassessmentrecommendationisbartooltoimprovequalityandsafetymeasureinalithotripsyandendourologicalunit
AT hurtadonavarroclara impactoftheimplementationofidentificationsituationbackgroundassessmentrecommendationisbartooltoimprovequalityandsafetymeasureinalithotripsyandendourologicalunit