Cargando…
Objective response rate targets for recurrent glioblastoma clinical trials based on the historic association between objective response rate and median overall survival
Durable objective response rate (ORR) remains a meaningful endpoint in recurrent cancer; however, the target ORR for single-arm recurrent glioblastoma trials has not been based on historic information or tied to patient outcomes. The current study reviewed 68 treatment arms comprising 4793 patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36617262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noad002 |
_version_ | 1785053153123631104 |
---|---|
author | Ellingson, Benjamin M Wen, Patrick Y Chang, Susan M van den Bent, Martin Vogelbaum, Michael A Li, Gang Li, Shanpeng Kim, Jiyoon Youssef, Gilbert Wick, Wolfgang Lassman, Andrew B Gilbert, Mark R de Groot, John F Weller, Michael Galanis, Evanthia Cloughesy, Timothy F |
author_facet | Ellingson, Benjamin M Wen, Patrick Y Chang, Susan M van den Bent, Martin Vogelbaum, Michael A Li, Gang Li, Shanpeng Kim, Jiyoon Youssef, Gilbert Wick, Wolfgang Lassman, Andrew B Gilbert, Mark R de Groot, John F Weller, Michael Galanis, Evanthia Cloughesy, Timothy F |
author_sort | Ellingson, Benjamin M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Durable objective response rate (ORR) remains a meaningful endpoint in recurrent cancer; however, the target ORR for single-arm recurrent glioblastoma trials has not been based on historic information or tied to patient outcomes. The current study reviewed 68 treatment arms comprising 4793 patients in past trials in recurrent glioblastoma in order to judiciously define target ORRs for use in recurrent glioblastoma trials. ORR was estimated at 6.1% [95% CI 4.23; 8.76%] for cytotoxic chemothera + pies (ORR = 7.59% for lomustine, 7.57% for temozolomide, 0.64% for irinotecan, and 5.32% for other agents), 3.37% for biologic agents, 7.97% for (select) immunotherapies, and 26.8% for anti-angiogenic agents. ORRs were significantly correlated with median overall survival (mOS) across chemotherapy (R(2)= 0.4078, P < .0001), biologics (R(2)= 0.4003, P = .0003), and immunotherapy trials (R(2)= 0.8994, P < .0001), but not anti-angiogenic agents (R(2)= 0, P = .8937). Pooling data from chemotherapy, biologics, and immunotherapy trials, a meta-analysis indicated a strong correlation between ORR and mOS (R(2)= 0.3900, P < .0001; mOS [weeks] = 1.4xORR + 24.8). Assuming an ineffective cytotoxic (control) therapy has ORR = 7.6%, the average ORR for lomustine and temozolomide trials, a sample size of ≥40 patients with target ORR>25% is needed to demonstrate statistical significance compared to control with a high level of confidence (P < .01) and adequate power (>80%). Given this historic data and potential biases in patient selection, we recommend that well-controlled, single-arm phase II studies in recurrent glioblastoma should have a target ORR >25% (which translates to a median OS of approximately 15 months) and a sample size of ≥40 patients, in order to convincingly demonstrate antitumor activity. Crucially, this response needs to have sufficient durability, which was not addressed in the current study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10237425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102374252023-06-03 Objective response rate targets for recurrent glioblastoma clinical trials based on the historic association between objective response rate and median overall survival Ellingson, Benjamin M Wen, Patrick Y Chang, Susan M van den Bent, Martin Vogelbaum, Michael A Li, Gang Li, Shanpeng Kim, Jiyoon Youssef, Gilbert Wick, Wolfgang Lassman, Andrew B Gilbert, Mark R de Groot, John F Weller, Michael Galanis, Evanthia Cloughesy, Timothy F Neuro Oncol Review Durable objective response rate (ORR) remains a meaningful endpoint in recurrent cancer; however, the target ORR for single-arm recurrent glioblastoma trials has not been based on historic information or tied to patient outcomes. The current study reviewed 68 treatment arms comprising 4793 patients in past trials in recurrent glioblastoma in order to judiciously define target ORRs for use in recurrent glioblastoma trials. ORR was estimated at 6.1% [95% CI 4.23; 8.76%] for cytotoxic chemothera + pies (ORR = 7.59% for lomustine, 7.57% for temozolomide, 0.64% for irinotecan, and 5.32% for other agents), 3.37% for biologic agents, 7.97% for (select) immunotherapies, and 26.8% for anti-angiogenic agents. ORRs were significantly correlated with median overall survival (mOS) across chemotherapy (R(2)= 0.4078, P < .0001), biologics (R(2)= 0.4003, P = .0003), and immunotherapy trials (R(2)= 0.8994, P < .0001), but not anti-angiogenic agents (R(2)= 0, P = .8937). Pooling data from chemotherapy, biologics, and immunotherapy trials, a meta-analysis indicated a strong correlation between ORR and mOS (R(2)= 0.3900, P < .0001; mOS [weeks] = 1.4xORR + 24.8). Assuming an ineffective cytotoxic (control) therapy has ORR = 7.6%, the average ORR for lomustine and temozolomide trials, a sample size of ≥40 patients with target ORR>25% is needed to demonstrate statistical significance compared to control with a high level of confidence (P < .01) and adequate power (>80%). Given this historic data and potential biases in patient selection, we recommend that well-controlled, single-arm phase II studies in recurrent glioblastoma should have a target ORR >25% (which translates to a median OS of approximately 15 months) and a sample size of ≥40 patients, in order to convincingly demonstrate antitumor activity. Crucially, this response needs to have sufficient durability, which was not addressed in the current study. Oxford University Press 2023-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10237425/ /pubmed/36617262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noad002 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Review Ellingson, Benjamin M Wen, Patrick Y Chang, Susan M van den Bent, Martin Vogelbaum, Michael A Li, Gang Li, Shanpeng Kim, Jiyoon Youssef, Gilbert Wick, Wolfgang Lassman, Andrew B Gilbert, Mark R de Groot, John F Weller, Michael Galanis, Evanthia Cloughesy, Timothy F Objective response rate targets for recurrent glioblastoma clinical trials based on the historic association between objective response rate and median overall survival |
title | Objective response rate targets for recurrent glioblastoma clinical trials based on the historic association between objective response rate and median overall survival |
title_full | Objective response rate targets for recurrent glioblastoma clinical trials based on the historic association between objective response rate and median overall survival |
title_fullStr | Objective response rate targets for recurrent glioblastoma clinical trials based on the historic association between objective response rate and median overall survival |
title_full_unstemmed | Objective response rate targets for recurrent glioblastoma clinical trials based on the historic association between objective response rate and median overall survival |
title_short | Objective response rate targets for recurrent glioblastoma clinical trials based on the historic association between objective response rate and median overall survival |
title_sort | objective response rate targets for recurrent glioblastoma clinical trials based on the historic association between objective response rate and median overall survival |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36617262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noad002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ellingsonbenjaminm objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival AT wenpatricky objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival AT changsusanm objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival AT vandenbentmartin objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival AT vogelbaummichaela objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival AT ligang objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival AT lishanpeng objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival AT kimjiyoon objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival AT youssefgilbert objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival AT wickwolfgang objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival AT lassmanandrewb objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival AT gilbertmarkr objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival AT degrootjohnf objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival AT wellermichael objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival AT galanisevanthia objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival AT cloughesytimothyf objectiveresponseratetargetsforrecurrentglioblastomaclinicaltrialsbasedonthehistoricassociationbetweenobjectiveresponserateandmedianoverallsurvival |