Cargando…

A smartphone-based tapping task as a marker of medication response in Parkinson’s disease: a proof of concept study

Tapping tasks have the potential to distinguish between ON–OFF fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease (PD) possibly aiding assessment of medication status in e-diaries and research. This proof of concept study aims to assess the feasibility and accuracy of a smartphone-based tapping task (developed as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Broeder, Sanne, Roussos, George, De Vleeschhauwer, Joni, D’Cruz, Nicholas, de Xivry, Jean-Jacques Orban, Nieuwboer, Alice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37268772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-023-02659-w
_version_ 1785053173925281792
author Broeder, Sanne
Roussos, George
De Vleeschhauwer, Joni
D’Cruz, Nicholas
de Xivry, Jean-Jacques Orban
Nieuwboer, Alice
author_facet Broeder, Sanne
Roussos, George
De Vleeschhauwer, Joni
D’Cruz, Nicholas
de Xivry, Jean-Jacques Orban
Nieuwboer, Alice
author_sort Broeder, Sanne
collection PubMed
description Tapping tasks have the potential to distinguish between ON–OFF fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease (PD) possibly aiding assessment of medication status in e-diaries and research. This proof of concept study aims to assess the feasibility and accuracy of a smartphone-based tapping task (developed as part of the cloudUPDRS-project) to discriminate between ON–OFF used in the home setting without supervision. 32 PD patients performed the task before their first medication intake, followed by two test sessions after 1 and 3 h. Testing was repeated for 7 days. Index finger tapping between two targets was performed as fast as possible with each hand. Self-reported ON–OFF status was also indicated. Reminders were sent for testing and medication intake. We studied task compliance, objective performance (frequency and inter-tap distance), classification accuracy and repeatability of tapping. Average compliance was 97.0% (± 3.3%), but 16 patients (50%) needed remote assistance. Self-reported ON–OFF scores and objective tapping were worse pre versus post medication intake (p < 0.0005). Repeated tests showed good to excellent test–retest reliability in ON (0.707 ≤ ICC ≤ 0.975). Although 7 days learning effects were apparent, ON–OFF differences remained. Discriminative accuracy for ON–OFF was particularly good for right-hand tapping (0.72 ≤ AUC ≤ 0.80). Medication dose was associated with ON–OFF tapping changes. Unsupervised tapping tests performed on a smartphone have the potential to classify ON–OFF fluctuations in the home setting, despite some learning and time effects. Replication of these results are needed in a wider sample of patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00702-023-02659-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10237522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102375222023-06-06 A smartphone-based tapping task as a marker of medication response in Parkinson’s disease: a proof of concept study Broeder, Sanne Roussos, George De Vleeschhauwer, Joni D’Cruz, Nicholas de Xivry, Jean-Jacques Orban Nieuwboer, Alice J Neural Transm (Vienna) Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article Tapping tasks have the potential to distinguish between ON–OFF fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease (PD) possibly aiding assessment of medication status in e-diaries and research. This proof of concept study aims to assess the feasibility and accuracy of a smartphone-based tapping task (developed as part of the cloudUPDRS-project) to discriminate between ON–OFF used in the home setting without supervision. 32 PD patients performed the task before their first medication intake, followed by two test sessions after 1 and 3 h. Testing was repeated for 7 days. Index finger tapping between two targets was performed as fast as possible with each hand. Self-reported ON–OFF status was also indicated. Reminders were sent for testing and medication intake. We studied task compliance, objective performance (frequency and inter-tap distance), classification accuracy and repeatability of tapping. Average compliance was 97.0% (± 3.3%), but 16 patients (50%) needed remote assistance. Self-reported ON–OFF scores and objective tapping were worse pre versus post medication intake (p < 0.0005). Repeated tests showed good to excellent test–retest reliability in ON (0.707 ≤ ICC ≤ 0.975). Although 7 days learning effects were apparent, ON–OFF differences remained. Discriminative accuracy for ON–OFF was particularly good for right-hand tapping (0.72 ≤ AUC ≤ 0.80). Medication dose was associated with ON–OFF tapping changes. Unsupervised tapping tests performed on a smartphone have the potential to classify ON–OFF fluctuations in the home setting, despite some learning and time effects. Replication of these results are needed in a wider sample of patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00702-023-02659-w. Springer Vienna 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10237522/ /pubmed/37268772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-023-02659-w Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article
Broeder, Sanne
Roussos, George
De Vleeschhauwer, Joni
D’Cruz, Nicholas
de Xivry, Jean-Jacques Orban
Nieuwboer, Alice
A smartphone-based tapping task as a marker of medication response in Parkinson’s disease: a proof of concept study
title A smartphone-based tapping task as a marker of medication response in Parkinson’s disease: a proof of concept study
title_full A smartphone-based tapping task as a marker of medication response in Parkinson’s disease: a proof of concept study
title_fullStr A smartphone-based tapping task as a marker of medication response in Parkinson’s disease: a proof of concept study
title_full_unstemmed A smartphone-based tapping task as a marker of medication response in Parkinson’s disease: a proof of concept study
title_short A smartphone-based tapping task as a marker of medication response in Parkinson’s disease: a proof of concept study
title_sort smartphone-based tapping task as a marker of medication response in parkinson’s disease: a proof of concept study
topic Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10237522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37268772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-023-02659-w
work_keys_str_mv AT broedersanne asmartphonebasedtappingtaskasamarkerofmedicationresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseaproofofconceptstudy
AT roussosgeorge asmartphonebasedtappingtaskasamarkerofmedicationresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseaproofofconceptstudy
AT devleeschhauwerjoni asmartphonebasedtappingtaskasamarkerofmedicationresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseaproofofconceptstudy
AT dcruznicholas asmartphonebasedtappingtaskasamarkerofmedicationresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseaproofofconceptstudy
AT dexivryjeanjacquesorban asmartphonebasedtappingtaskasamarkerofmedicationresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseaproofofconceptstudy
AT nieuwboeralice asmartphonebasedtappingtaskasamarkerofmedicationresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseaproofofconceptstudy
AT broedersanne smartphonebasedtappingtaskasamarkerofmedicationresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseaproofofconceptstudy
AT roussosgeorge smartphonebasedtappingtaskasamarkerofmedicationresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseaproofofconceptstudy
AT devleeschhauwerjoni smartphonebasedtappingtaskasamarkerofmedicationresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseaproofofconceptstudy
AT dcruznicholas smartphonebasedtappingtaskasamarkerofmedicationresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseaproofofconceptstudy
AT dexivryjeanjacquesorban smartphonebasedtappingtaskasamarkerofmedicationresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseaproofofconceptstudy
AT nieuwboeralice smartphonebasedtappingtaskasamarkerofmedicationresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseaproofofconceptstudy