Cargando…
Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy
Uterine manipulation is essential for moving the uterus and proper anatomical dissection without complications during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Although many different uterine manipulators (UM) have been designed in the last few decades, there is still no “optimal UM” that is universall...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10238037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37266642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033927 |
_version_ | 1785053207308795904 |
---|---|
author | Güven, Cenk Mustafa Uysal, Dilek Kolsuz, Zafer Yilmaz, Bülent |
author_facet | Güven, Cenk Mustafa Uysal, Dilek Kolsuz, Zafer Yilmaz, Bülent |
author_sort | Güven, Cenk Mustafa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Uterine manipulation is essential for moving the uterus and proper anatomical dissection without complications during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Although many different uterine manipulators (UM) have been designed in the last few decades, there is still no “optimal UM” that is universally safe, efficient, and cost-effective. This study aimed to compare myoma screw (MS) and UM with regard to surgical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in patients who underwent TLH. In the current study, we describe an operation technique that uses a MS instead of a uterine manipulator during TLH and discuss the surgical outcomes of this method. The use of MS resulted in significantly shorter operation time with respect to UM for uterine manipulation during TLH regarding benign indications, with affordable costs. The use of MS is a safe and cost-effective alternative to the use of UM during TLH. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10238037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102380372023-06-03 Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy Güven, Cenk Mustafa Uysal, Dilek Kolsuz, Zafer Yilmaz, Bülent Medicine (Baltimore) 5600 Uterine manipulation is essential for moving the uterus and proper anatomical dissection without complications during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Although many different uterine manipulators (UM) have been designed in the last few decades, there is still no “optimal UM” that is universally safe, efficient, and cost-effective. This study aimed to compare myoma screw (MS) and UM with regard to surgical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in patients who underwent TLH. In the current study, we describe an operation technique that uses a MS instead of a uterine manipulator during TLH and discuss the surgical outcomes of this method. The use of MS resulted in significantly shorter operation time with respect to UM for uterine manipulation during TLH regarding benign indications, with affordable costs. The use of MS is a safe and cost-effective alternative to the use of UM during TLH. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10238037/ /pubmed/37266642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033927 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | 5600 Güven, Cenk Mustafa Uysal, Dilek Kolsuz, Zafer Yilmaz, Bülent Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy |
title | Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy |
title_full | Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy |
title_fullStr | Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy |
title_short | Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy |
title_sort | surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy |
topic | 5600 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10238037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37266642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033927 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guvencenkmustafa surgicaloutcomesofintraabdominalversusvaginalapproachforuterinemanipulationduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy AT uysaldilek surgicaloutcomesofintraabdominalversusvaginalapproachforuterinemanipulationduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy AT kolsuzzafer surgicaloutcomesofintraabdominalversusvaginalapproachforuterinemanipulationduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy AT yilmazbulent surgicaloutcomesofintraabdominalversusvaginalapproachforuterinemanipulationduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy |