Cargando…

Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy

Uterine manipulation is essential for moving the uterus and proper anatomical dissection without complications during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Although many different uterine manipulators (UM) have been designed in the last few decades, there is still no “optimal UM” that is universall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Güven, Cenk Mustafa, Uysal, Dilek, Kolsuz, Zafer, Yilmaz, Bülent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10238037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37266642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033927
_version_ 1785053207308795904
author Güven, Cenk Mustafa
Uysal, Dilek
Kolsuz, Zafer
Yilmaz, Bülent
author_facet Güven, Cenk Mustafa
Uysal, Dilek
Kolsuz, Zafer
Yilmaz, Bülent
author_sort Güven, Cenk Mustafa
collection PubMed
description Uterine manipulation is essential for moving the uterus and proper anatomical dissection without complications during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Although many different uterine manipulators (UM) have been designed in the last few decades, there is still no “optimal UM” that is universally safe, efficient, and cost-effective. This study aimed to compare myoma screw (MS) and UM with regard to surgical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in patients who underwent TLH. In the current study, we describe an operation technique that uses a MS instead of a uterine manipulator during TLH and discuss the surgical outcomes of this method. The use of MS resulted in significantly shorter operation time with respect to UM for uterine manipulation during TLH regarding benign indications, with affordable costs. The use of MS is a safe and cost-effective alternative to the use of UM during TLH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10238037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102380372023-06-03 Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy Güven, Cenk Mustafa Uysal, Dilek Kolsuz, Zafer Yilmaz, Bülent Medicine (Baltimore) 5600 Uterine manipulation is essential for moving the uterus and proper anatomical dissection without complications during total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Although many different uterine manipulators (UM) have been designed in the last few decades, there is still no “optimal UM” that is universally safe, efficient, and cost-effective. This study aimed to compare myoma screw (MS) and UM with regard to surgical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in patients who underwent TLH. In the current study, we describe an operation technique that uses a MS instead of a uterine manipulator during TLH and discuss the surgical outcomes of this method. The use of MS resulted in significantly shorter operation time with respect to UM for uterine manipulation during TLH regarding benign indications, with affordable costs. The use of MS is a safe and cost-effective alternative to the use of UM during TLH. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10238037/ /pubmed/37266642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033927 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle 5600
Güven, Cenk Mustafa
Uysal, Dilek
Kolsuz, Zafer
Yilmaz, Bülent
Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy
title Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy
title_full Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy
title_fullStr Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy
title_short Surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy
title_sort surgical outcomes of intraabdominal versus vaginal approach for uterine manipulation during total laparoscopic hysterectomy
topic 5600
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10238037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37266642
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033927
work_keys_str_mv AT guvencenkmustafa surgicaloutcomesofintraabdominalversusvaginalapproachforuterinemanipulationduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy
AT uysaldilek surgicaloutcomesofintraabdominalversusvaginalapproachforuterinemanipulationduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy
AT kolsuzzafer surgicaloutcomesofintraabdominalversusvaginalapproachforuterinemanipulationduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy
AT yilmazbulent surgicaloutcomesofintraabdominalversusvaginalapproachforuterinemanipulationduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy