Cargando…

Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Spirometry patterns can suggest that a patient has a restrictive ventilatory impairment; however, lung volume measurements such as total lung capacity (TLC) are required to confirm the diagnosis. The aim of the study was to train a supervised machine learning model that can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beverin, Luka, Topalovic, Marko, Halilovic, Armin, Desbordes, Paul, Janssens, Wim, De Vos, Maarten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10238228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37275373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1174631
_version_ 1785053246956503040
author Beverin, Luka
Topalovic, Marko
Halilovic, Armin
Desbordes, Paul
Janssens, Wim
De Vos, Maarten
author_facet Beverin, Luka
Topalovic, Marko
Halilovic, Armin
Desbordes, Paul
Janssens, Wim
De Vos, Maarten
author_sort Beverin, Luka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Spirometry patterns can suggest that a patient has a restrictive ventilatory impairment; however, lung volume measurements such as total lung capacity (TLC) are required to confirm the diagnosis. The aim of the study was to train a supervised machine learning model that can accurately estimate TLC values from spirometry and subsequently identify which patients would most benefit from undergoing a complete pulmonary function test. METHODS: We trained three tree-based machine learning models on 51,761 spirometry data points with corresponding TLC measurements. We then compared model performance using an independent test set consisting of 1,402 patients. The best-performing model was used to retrospectively identify restrictive ventilatory impairment in the same test set. The algorithm was compared against different spirometry patterns commonly used to predict restriction. RESULTS: The prevalence of restrictive ventilatory impairment in the test set is 16.7% (234/1402). CatBoost was the best-performing machine learning model. It predicted TLC with a mean squared error (MSE) of 560.1 mL. The sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score of the optimal algorithm for predicting restrictive ventilatory impairment was 83, 92, and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A machine learning model trained on spirometry data can estimate TLC to a high degree of accuracy. This approach could be used to develop future smart home-based spirometry solutions, which could aid decision making and self-monitoring in patients with restrictive lung diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10238228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102382282023-06-04 Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach Beverin, Luka Topalovic, Marko Halilovic, Armin Desbordes, Paul Janssens, Wim De Vos, Maarten Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Spirometry patterns can suggest that a patient has a restrictive ventilatory impairment; however, lung volume measurements such as total lung capacity (TLC) are required to confirm the diagnosis. The aim of the study was to train a supervised machine learning model that can accurately estimate TLC values from spirometry and subsequently identify which patients would most benefit from undergoing a complete pulmonary function test. METHODS: We trained three tree-based machine learning models on 51,761 spirometry data points with corresponding TLC measurements. We then compared model performance using an independent test set consisting of 1,402 patients. The best-performing model was used to retrospectively identify restrictive ventilatory impairment in the same test set. The algorithm was compared against different spirometry patterns commonly used to predict restriction. RESULTS: The prevalence of restrictive ventilatory impairment in the test set is 16.7% (234/1402). CatBoost was the best-performing machine learning model. It predicted TLC with a mean squared error (MSE) of 560.1 mL. The sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score of the optimal algorithm for predicting restrictive ventilatory impairment was 83, 92, and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A machine learning model trained on spirometry data can estimate TLC to a high degree of accuracy. This approach could be used to develop future smart home-based spirometry solutions, which could aid decision making and self-monitoring in patients with restrictive lung diseases. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10238228/ /pubmed/37275373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1174631 Text en Copyright © 2023 Beverin, Topalovic, Halilovic, Desbordes, Janssens and De Vos. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Beverin, Luka
Topalovic, Marko
Halilovic, Armin
Desbordes, Paul
Janssens, Wim
De Vos, Maarten
Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach
title Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach
title_full Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach
title_fullStr Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach
title_full_unstemmed Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach
title_short Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach
title_sort predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10238228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37275373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1174631
work_keys_str_mv AT beverinluka predictingtotallungcapacityfromspirometryamachinelearningapproach
AT topalovicmarko predictingtotallungcapacityfromspirometryamachinelearningapproach
AT halilovicarmin predictingtotallungcapacityfromspirometryamachinelearningapproach
AT desbordespaul predictingtotallungcapacityfromspirometryamachinelearningapproach
AT janssenswim predictingtotallungcapacityfromspirometryamachinelearningapproach
AT devosmaarten predictingtotallungcapacityfromspirometryamachinelearningapproach