Cargando…
Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Spirometry patterns can suggest that a patient has a restrictive ventilatory impairment; however, lung volume measurements such as total lung capacity (TLC) are required to confirm the diagnosis. The aim of the study was to train a supervised machine learning model that can...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10238228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37275373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1174631 |
_version_ | 1785053246956503040 |
---|---|
author | Beverin, Luka Topalovic, Marko Halilovic, Armin Desbordes, Paul Janssens, Wim De Vos, Maarten |
author_facet | Beverin, Luka Topalovic, Marko Halilovic, Armin Desbordes, Paul Janssens, Wim De Vos, Maarten |
author_sort | Beverin, Luka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Spirometry patterns can suggest that a patient has a restrictive ventilatory impairment; however, lung volume measurements such as total lung capacity (TLC) are required to confirm the diagnosis. The aim of the study was to train a supervised machine learning model that can accurately estimate TLC values from spirometry and subsequently identify which patients would most benefit from undergoing a complete pulmonary function test. METHODS: We trained three tree-based machine learning models on 51,761 spirometry data points with corresponding TLC measurements. We then compared model performance using an independent test set consisting of 1,402 patients. The best-performing model was used to retrospectively identify restrictive ventilatory impairment in the same test set. The algorithm was compared against different spirometry patterns commonly used to predict restriction. RESULTS: The prevalence of restrictive ventilatory impairment in the test set is 16.7% (234/1402). CatBoost was the best-performing machine learning model. It predicted TLC with a mean squared error (MSE) of 560.1 mL. The sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score of the optimal algorithm for predicting restrictive ventilatory impairment was 83, 92, and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A machine learning model trained on spirometry data can estimate TLC to a high degree of accuracy. This approach could be used to develop future smart home-based spirometry solutions, which could aid decision making and self-monitoring in patients with restrictive lung diseases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10238228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102382282023-06-04 Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach Beverin, Luka Topalovic, Marko Halilovic, Armin Desbordes, Paul Janssens, Wim De Vos, Maarten Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Spirometry patterns can suggest that a patient has a restrictive ventilatory impairment; however, lung volume measurements such as total lung capacity (TLC) are required to confirm the diagnosis. The aim of the study was to train a supervised machine learning model that can accurately estimate TLC values from spirometry and subsequently identify which patients would most benefit from undergoing a complete pulmonary function test. METHODS: We trained three tree-based machine learning models on 51,761 spirometry data points with corresponding TLC measurements. We then compared model performance using an independent test set consisting of 1,402 patients. The best-performing model was used to retrospectively identify restrictive ventilatory impairment in the same test set. The algorithm was compared against different spirometry patterns commonly used to predict restriction. RESULTS: The prevalence of restrictive ventilatory impairment in the test set is 16.7% (234/1402). CatBoost was the best-performing machine learning model. It predicted TLC with a mean squared error (MSE) of 560.1 mL. The sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score of the optimal algorithm for predicting restrictive ventilatory impairment was 83, 92, and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A machine learning model trained on spirometry data can estimate TLC to a high degree of accuracy. This approach could be used to develop future smart home-based spirometry solutions, which could aid decision making and self-monitoring in patients with restrictive lung diseases. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10238228/ /pubmed/37275373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1174631 Text en Copyright © 2023 Beverin, Topalovic, Halilovic, Desbordes, Janssens and De Vos. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Beverin, Luka Topalovic, Marko Halilovic, Armin Desbordes, Paul Janssens, Wim De Vos, Maarten Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach |
title | Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach |
title_full | Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach |
title_fullStr | Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach |
title_short | Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach |
title_sort | predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10238228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37275373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1174631 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beverinluka predictingtotallungcapacityfromspirometryamachinelearningapproach AT topalovicmarko predictingtotallungcapacityfromspirometryamachinelearningapproach AT halilovicarmin predictingtotallungcapacityfromspirometryamachinelearningapproach AT desbordespaul predictingtotallungcapacityfromspirometryamachinelearningapproach AT janssenswim predictingtotallungcapacityfromspirometryamachinelearningapproach AT devosmaarten predictingtotallungcapacityfromspirometryamachinelearningapproach |