Cargando…
The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration
The pore morphology design of bioceramic scaffolds plays a substantial role in the induction of bone regeneration. Specifically, the effects of different scaffold pore geometry designs on angiogenesis and new bone regeneration remain unclear. Therefore, we fabricated Mg/Sr co-doped wollastonite bioc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10238647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37273795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100667 |
_version_ | 1785053329600020480 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yifan Li, Jiafeng Jiang, Shuai Zhong, Cheng Zhao, Chenchen Jiao, Yang Shen, Jian Chen, Huaizhi Ye, Meihan Zhou, Jiayu Yang, Xianyan Gou, Zhongru Xu, Sanzhong Shen, Miaoda |
author_facet | Li, Yifan Li, Jiafeng Jiang, Shuai Zhong, Cheng Zhao, Chenchen Jiao, Yang Shen, Jian Chen, Huaizhi Ye, Meihan Zhou, Jiayu Yang, Xianyan Gou, Zhongru Xu, Sanzhong Shen, Miaoda |
author_sort | Li, Yifan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The pore morphology design of bioceramic scaffolds plays a substantial role in the induction of bone regeneration. Specifically, the effects of different scaffold pore geometry designs on angiogenesis and new bone regeneration remain unclear. Therefore, we fabricated Mg/Sr co-doped wollastonite bioceramic (MS-CSi) scaffolds with three different pore geometries (gyroid, cylindrical, and cubic) and compared their effects on osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. The MS-CSi scaffolds were fabricated by digital light processing (DLP) printing technology. The pore structure, mechanical properties, and degradation rate of the scaffolds were investigated. Cell proliferation on the scaffolds was evaluated using CCK-8 assays while angiogenesis was assessed using Transwell migration assays, tube formation assays, and immunofluorescence staining. The underlying mechanism was explored by western blotting. Osteogenic ability of scaffolds was evaluated by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining, western blotting, and qRT-PCR. Subsequently, a rabbit femoral defect model was prepared to compare differences in the scaffolds in osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vivo. Cell culture experiments showed that the gyroid pore scaffold downregulated YAP/TAZ phosphorylation and enhanced YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation, thereby promoting proliferation, migration, tube formation, and high expression of CD31 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) while strut-based (cubic and cylindrical pore) scaffolds promoted osteogenic differentiation in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and upregulation of osteogenesis-related genes. The gyroid pore scaffolds were observed to facilitate early angiogenesis in the femoral-defect model rabbits while the strut-based scaffolds promoted the formation of new bone tissue. Our study indicated that the pore geometries and pore curvature characteristics of bioceramic scaffolds can be precisely tuned for enhancing both osteogenesis and angiogenesis. These results may provide new ideas for the design of bioceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10238647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102386472023-06-04 The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration Li, Yifan Li, Jiafeng Jiang, Shuai Zhong, Cheng Zhao, Chenchen Jiao, Yang Shen, Jian Chen, Huaizhi Ye, Meihan Zhou, Jiayu Yang, Xianyan Gou, Zhongru Xu, Sanzhong Shen, Miaoda Mater Today Bio Full Length Article The pore morphology design of bioceramic scaffolds plays a substantial role in the induction of bone regeneration. Specifically, the effects of different scaffold pore geometry designs on angiogenesis and new bone regeneration remain unclear. Therefore, we fabricated Mg/Sr co-doped wollastonite bioceramic (MS-CSi) scaffolds with three different pore geometries (gyroid, cylindrical, and cubic) and compared their effects on osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. The MS-CSi scaffolds were fabricated by digital light processing (DLP) printing technology. The pore structure, mechanical properties, and degradation rate of the scaffolds were investigated. Cell proliferation on the scaffolds was evaluated using CCK-8 assays while angiogenesis was assessed using Transwell migration assays, tube formation assays, and immunofluorescence staining. The underlying mechanism was explored by western blotting. Osteogenic ability of scaffolds was evaluated by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining, western blotting, and qRT-PCR. Subsequently, a rabbit femoral defect model was prepared to compare differences in the scaffolds in osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vivo. Cell culture experiments showed that the gyroid pore scaffold downregulated YAP/TAZ phosphorylation and enhanced YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation, thereby promoting proliferation, migration, tube formation, and high expression of CD31 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) while strut-based (cubic and cylindrical pore) scaffolds promoted osteogenic differentiation in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and upregulation of osteogenesis-related genes. The gyroid pore scaffolds were observed to facilitate early angiogenesis in the femoral-defect model rabbits while the strut-based scaffolds promoted the formation of new bone tissue. Our study indicated that the pore geometries and pore curvature characteristics of bioceramic scaffolds can be precisely tuned for enhancing both osteogenesis and angiogenesis. These results may provide new ideas for the design of bioceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration. Elsevier 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10238647/ /pubmed/37273795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100667 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Full Length Article Li, Yifan Li, Jiafeng Jiang, Shuai Zhong, Cheng Zhao, Chenchen Jiao, Yang Shen, Jian Chen, Huaizhi Ye, Meihan Zhou, Jiayu Yang, Xianyan Gou, Zhongru Xu, Sanzhong Shen, Miaoda The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration |
title | The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration |
title_full | The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration |
title_fullStr | The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration |
title_short | The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration |
title_sort | design of strut/tpms-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration |
topic | Full Length Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10238647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37273795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100667 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyifan thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT lijiafeng thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT jiangshuai thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT zhongcheng thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT zhaochenchen thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT jiaoyang thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT shenjian thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT chenhuaizhi thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT yemeihan thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT zhoujiayu thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT yangxianyan thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT gouzhongru thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT xusanzhong thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT shenmiaoda thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT liyifan designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT lijiafeng designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT jiangshuai designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT zhongcheng designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT zhaochenchen designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT jiaoyang designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT shenjian designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT chenhuaizhi designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT yemeihan designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT zhoujiayu designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT yangxianyan designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT gouzhongru designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT xusanzhong designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration AT shenmiaoda designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration |