Cargando…

The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration

The pore morphology design of bioceramic scaffolds plays a substantial role in the induction of bone regeneration. Specifically, the effects of different scaffold pore geometry designs on angiogenesis and new bone regeneration remain unclear. Therefore, we fabricated Mg/Sr co-doped wollastonite bioc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yifan, Li, Jiafeng, Jiang, Shuai, Zhong, Cheng, Zhao, Chenchen, Jiao, Yang, Shen, Jian, Chen, Huaizhi, Ye, Meihan, Zhou, Jiayu, Yang, Xianyan, Gou, Zhongru, Xu, Sanzhong, Shen, Miaoda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10238647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37273795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100667
_version_ 1785053329600020480
author Li, Yifan
Li, Jiafeng
Jiang, Shuai
Zhong, Cheng
Zhao, Chenchen
Jiao, Yang
Shen, Jian
Chen, Huaizhi
Ye, Meihan
Zhou, Jiayu
Yang, Xianyan
Gou, Zhongru
Xu, Sanzhong
Shen, Miaoda
author_facet Li, Yifan
Li, Jiafeng
Jiang, Shuai
Zhong, Cheng
Zhao, Chenchen
Jiao, Yang
Shen, Jian
Chen, Huaizhi
Ye, Meihan
Zhou, Jiayu
Yang, Xianyan
Gou, Zhongru
Xu, Sanzhong
Shen, Miaoda
author_sort Li, Yifan
collection PubMed
description The pore morphology design of bioceramic scaffolds plays a substantial role in the induction of bone regeneration. Specifically, the effects of different scaffold pore geometry designs on angiogenesis and new bone regeneration remain unclear. Therefore, we fabricated Mg/Sr co-doped wollastonite bioceramic (MS-CSi) scaffolds with three different pore geometries (gyroid, cylindrical, and cubic) and compared their effects on osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. The MS-CSi scaffolds were fabricated by digital light processing (DLP) printing technology. The pore structure, mechanical properties, and degradation rate of the scaffolds were investigated. Cell proliferation on the scaffolds was evaluated using CCK-8 assays while angiogenesis was assessed using Transwell migration assays, tube formation assays, and immunofluorescence staining. The underlying mechanism was explored by western blotting. Osteogenic ability of scaffolds was evaluated by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining, western blotting, and qRT-PCR. Subsequently, a rabbit femoral defect model was prepared to compare differences in the scaffolds in osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vivo. Cell culture experiments showed that the gyroid pore scaffold downregulated YAP/TAZ phosphorylation and enhanced YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation, thereby promoting proliferation, migration, tube formation, and high expression of CD31 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) while strut-based (cubic and cylindrical pore) scaffolds promoted osteogenic differentiation in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and upregulation of osteogenesis-related genes. The gyroid pore scaffolds were observed to facilitate early angiogenesis in the femoral-defect model rabbits while the strut-based scaffolds promoted the formation of new bone tissue. Our study indicated that the pore geometries and pore curvature characteristics of bioceramic scaffolds can be precisely tuned for enhancing both osteogenesis and angiogenesis. These results may provide new ideas for the design of bioceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10238647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102386472023-06-04 The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration Li, Yifan Li, Jiafeng Jiang, Shuai Zhong, Cheng Zhao, Chenchen Jiao, Yang Shen, Jian Chen, Huaizhi Ye, Meihan Zhou, Jiayu Yang, Xianyan Gou, Zhongru Xu, Sanzhong Shen, Miaoda Mater Today Bio Full Length Article The pore morphology design of bioceramic scaffolds plays a substantial role in the induction of bone regeneration. Specifically, the effects of different scaffold pore geometry designs on angiogenesis and new bone regeneration remain unclear. Therefore, we fabricated Mg/Sr co-doped wollastonite bioceramic (MS-CSi) scaffolds with three different pore geometries (gyroid, cylindrical, and cubic) and compared their effects on osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. The MS-CSi scaffolds were fabricated by digital light processing (DLP) printing technology. The pore structure, mechanical properties, and degradation rate of the scaffolds were investigated. Cell proliferation on the scaffolds was evaluated using CCK-8 assays while angiogenesis was assessed using Transwell migration assays, tube formation assays, and immunofluorescence staining. The underlying mechanism was explored by western blotting. Osteogenic ability of scaffolds was evaluated by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining, western blotting, and qRT-PCR. Subsequently, a rabbit femoral defect model was prepared to compare differences in the scaffolds in osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vivo. Cell culture experiments showed that the gyroid pore scaffold downregulated YAP/TAZ phosphorylation and enhanced YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation, thereby promoting proliferation, migration, tube formation, and high expression of CD31 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) while strut-based (cubic and cylindrical pore) scaffolds promoted osteogenic differentiation in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and upregulation of osteogenesis-related genes. The gyroid pore scaffolds were observed to facilitate early angiogenesis in the femoral-defect model rabbits while the strut-based scaffolds promoted the formation of new bone tissue. Our study indicated that the pore geometries and pore curvature characteristics of bioceramic scaffolds can be precisely tuned for enhancing both osteogenesis and angiogenesis. These results may provide new ideas for the design of bioceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration. Elsevier 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10238647/ /pubmed/37273795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100667 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Full Length Article
Li, Yifan
Li, Jiafeng
Jiang, Shuai
Zhong, Cheng
Zhao, Chenchen
Jiao, Yang
Shen, Jian
Chen, Huaizhi
Ye, Meihan
Zhou, Jiayu
Yang, Xianyan
Gou, Zhongru
Xu, Sanzhong
Shen, Miaoda
The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration
title The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration
title_full The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration
title_fullStr The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration
title_full_unstemmed The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration
title_short The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration
title_sort design of strut/tpms-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration
topic Full Length Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10238647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37273795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100667
work_keys_str_mv AT liyifan thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT lijiafeng thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT jiangshuai thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT zhongcheng thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT zhaochenchen thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT jiaoyang thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT shenjian thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT chenhuaizhi thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT yemeihan thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT zhoujiayu thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT yangxianyan thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT gouzhongru thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT xusanzhong thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT shenmiaoda thedesignofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT liyifan designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT lijiafeng designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT jiangshuai designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT zhongcheng designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT zhaochenchen designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT jiaoyang designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT shenjian designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT chenhuaizhi designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT yemeihan designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT zhoujiayu designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT yangxianyan designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT gouzhongru designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT xusanzhong designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration
AT shenmiaoda designofstruttpmsbasedporegeometriesinbioceramicscaffoldsguidingosteogenesisandangiogenesisinboneregeneration