Cargando…

Low incisional hernia incidence using a large-bite, low-tension technique for celiotomy closure

BACKGROUND: Incisional herniae (IH) are reported in 5–>20 % of patients undergoing open celiotomy, and can be linked to closure technique. The STITCH randomized trial favors a small bite technique for midline celiotomy closure with a 1-year IH rate of 13 % over larger bites (23 %). METHODS: A con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarkar, Joy, Minarich, Michael J., Smucker, Levi Y., Hardy, Ashley N., Schwarz, Roderich E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10238872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2023.05.002
_version_ 1785053374380507136
author Sarkar, Joy
Minarich, Michael J.
Smucker, Levi Y.
Hardy, Ashley N.
Schwarz, Roderich E.
author_facet Sarkar, Joy
Minarich, Michael J.
Smucker, Levi Y.
Hardy, Ashley N.
Schwarz, Roderich E.
author_sort Sarkar, Joy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Incisional herniae (IH) are reported in 5–>20 % of patients undergoing open celiotomy, and can be linked to closure technique. The STITCH randomized trial favors a small bite technique for midline celiotomy closure with a 1-year IH rate of 13 % over larger bites (23 %). METHODS: A continuous musculofascial mass closure with absorbable looped #1 PDS suture with 2-cm bite size was used for all open celiotomies. IH frequency and associated clinicopathologic factors were retrospectively analyzed from prospective data in 336 consecutive patients undergoing visceral resections by a single surgeon. RESULTS: The study population included 192 men and 144 women, 81 % of whom had a cancer diagnosis, who underwent hepatobiliary, pancreatic, gastroesophageal, and colorectal resections, or a combination. The majority of patients (84 %) had subcostal incisions, and 10 % received a midline incision. At a median follow-up of 19.5 months, the overall IH rate was 3.3 %. Hernia rates were 2.5 % for subcostal margin, 2.9 % for midline, and 5.5 % for other incisions (p = 0.006). Median time to hernia detection was 492 days. Factors associated with IH were increased weight, abdominal depth/girth, male sex, spleen size, visceral fat, and body height (p ≤ 0.04 for all), but not type of resection, prior operations, underlying diagnosis, weight loss, adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation, incision length or suture to incision ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The described technique leads to a low IH rate of <3 % in subcostal or midline incisions, and can be recommended for routine use. The observed results appear superior to those of the STITCH trial, even for the smaller midline incision cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10238872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102388722023-06-04 Low incisional hernia incidence using a large-bite, low-tension technique for celiotomy closure Sarkar, Joy Minarich, Michael J. Smucker, Levi Y. Hardy, Ashley N. Schwarz, Roderich E. Surg Open Sci Research Paper BACKGROUND: Incisional herniae (IH) are reported in 5–>20 % of patients undergoing open celiotomy, and can be linked to closure technique. The STITCH randomized trial favors a small bite technique for midline celiotomy closure with a 1-year IH rate of 13 % over larger bites (23 %). METHODS: A continuous musculofascial mass closure with absorbable looped #1 PDS suture with 2-cm bite size was used for all open celiotomies. IH frequency and associated clinicopathologic factors were retrospectively analyzed from prospective data in 336 consecutive patients undergoing visceral resections by a single surgeon. RESULTS: The study population included 192 men and 144 women, 81 % of whom had a cancer diagnosis, who underwent hepatobiliary, pancreatic, gastroesophageal, and colorectal resections, or a combination. The majority of patients (84 %) had subcostal incisions, and 10 % received a midline incision. At a median follow-up of 19.5 months, the overall IH rate was 3.3 %. Hernia rates were 2.5 % for subcostal margin, 2.9 % for midline, and 5.5 % for other incisions (p = 0.006). Median time to hernia detection was 492 days. Factors associated with IH were increased weight, abdominal depth/girth, male sex, spleen size, visceral fat, and body height (p ≤ 0.04 for all), but not type of resection, prior operations, underlying diagnosis, weight loss, adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation, incision length or suture to incision ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The described technique leads to a low IH rate of <3 % in subcostal or midline incisions, and can be recommended for routine use. The observed results appear superior to those of the STITCH trial, even for the smaller midline incision cohort. Elsevier 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10238872/ /pubmed/37274136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2023.05.002 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Sarkar, Joy
Minarich, Michael J.
Smucker, Levi Y.
Hardy, Ashley N.
Schwarz, Roderich E.
Low incisional hernia incidence using a large-bite, low-tension technique for celiotomy closure
title Low incisional hernia incidence using a large-bite, low-tension technique for celiotomy closure
title_full Low incisional hernia incidence using a large-bite, low-tension technique for celiotomy closure
title_fullStr Low incisional hernia incidence using a large-bite, low-tension technique for celiotomy closure
title_full_unstemmed Low incisional hernia incidence using a large-bite, low-tension technique for celiotomy closure
title_short Low incisional hernia incidence using a large-bite, low-tension technique for celiotomy closure
title_sort low incisional hernia incidence using a large-bite, low-tension technique for celiotomy closure
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10238872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2023.05.002
work_keys_str_mv AT sarkarjoy lowincisionalherniaincidenceusingalargebitelowtensiontechniqueforceliotomyclosure
AT minarichmichaelj lowincisionalherniaincidenceusingalargebitelowtensiontechniqueforceliotomyclosure
AT smuckerleviy lowincisionalherniaincidenceusingalargebitelowtensiontechniqueforceliotomyclosure
AT hardyashleyn lowincisionalherniaincidenceusingalargebitelowtensiontechniqueforceliotomyclosure
AT schwarzroderiche lowincisionalherniaincidenceusingalargebitelowtensiontechniqueforceliotomyclosure