Cargando…

American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure categories—a systematic review of the relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes in the first half of pregnancy

OBJECTIVE: A relationship between the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure thresholds and adverse pregnancy outcomes has been reported, but few studies have explored the diagnostic test properties of these cutoffs. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slade, Laura J., Mistry, Hiten D., Bone, Jeffrey N., Wilson, Milly, Blackman, Maya, Syeda, Nuhaat, von Dadelszen, Peter, Magee, Laura A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36241079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.004
_version_ 1785053419254317056
author Slade, Laura J.
Mistry, Hiten D.
Bone, Jeffrey N.
Wilson, Milly
Blackman, Maya
Syeda, Nuhaat
von Dadelszen, Peter
Magee, Laura A.
author_facet Slade, Laura J.
Mistry, Hiten D.
Bone, Jeffrey N.
Wilson, Milly
Blackman, Maya
Syeda, Nuhaat
von Dadelszen, Peter
Magee, Laura A.
author_sort Slade, Laura J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A relationship between the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure thresholds and adverse pregnancy outcomes has been reported, but few studies have explored the diagnostic test properties of these cutoffs. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched electronic databases (from 2017 to 2021) for reports of blood pressure measurements in pregnancy, classified according to 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association criteria, and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies recording blood pressure at <20 weeks gestation were included. METHODS: Meta-analyses were used to investigate the strength of the association between blood pressure cutoffs and adverse outcomes, and the diagnostic test properties were calculated. RESULTS: Of 23 studies included, there was a stepwise relationship between the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure category (when compared with normal blood pressure of <120/80 mmHg) and the strength of the association with preeclampsia. The category of elevated blood pressure had a risk ratio of 2.0 (95% prediction interval, 0.8–4.8), the stage 1 hypertension category had a risk ratio of 3.0 (95% prediction interval, 1.1–8.5), and the stage 2 hypertension category had a risk ratio of 7.9 (95% prediction interval, 1.8–35.1). Between-study variability was related to the magnitude of the association with stronger relationships in larger studies at low risk of bias and with unselected populations with multiple routine blood pressure measurements. None of the systolic blood pressure measurements of <120 mmHg, <130/80 mmHg, or <140/90 mmHg were useful to rule out the development of preeclampsia (all negative likelihood ratios >0.2). Only a blood pressure measurement of ≥140/90 mmHg was a good predictor for the development of preeclampsia (positive likelihood ratio, 5.95). The findings were similar for other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although a blood pressure of 120 to 140 over 80 to 90 mmHg at <20 weeks gestation is associated with a heightened risk for preeclampsia and adverse pregnancy outcomes and may assist in risk prediction in multivariable modelling, lowering the diagnostic threshold for chronic hypertension would not assist clinicians in identifying women at heightened risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10239058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102390582023-06-04 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure categories—a systematic review of the relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes in the first half of pregnancy Slade, Laura J. Mistry, Hiten D. Bone, Jeffrey N. Wilson, Milly Blackman, Maya Syeda, Nuhaat von Dadelszen, Peter Magee, Laura A. Am J Obstet Gynecol Systematic Reviews OBJECTIVE: A relationship between the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure thresholds and adverse pregnancy outcomes has been reported, but few studies have explored the diagnostic test properties of these cutoffs. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched electronic databases (from 2017 to 2021) for reports of blood pressure measurements in pregnancy, classified according to 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association criteria, and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies recording blood pressure at <20 weeks gestation were included. METHODS: Meta-analyses were used to investigate the strength of the association between blood pressure cutoffs and adverse outcomes, and the diagnostic test properties were calculated. RESULTS: Of 23 studies included, there was a stepwise relationship between the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure category (when compared with normal blood pressure of <120/80 mmHg) and the strength of the association with preeclampsia. The category of elevated blood pressure had a risk ratio of 2.0 (95% prediction interval, 0.8–4.8), the stage 1 hypertension category had a risk ratio of 3.0 (95% prediction interval, 1.1–8.5), and the stage 2 hypertension category had a risk ratio of 7.9 (95% prediction interval, 1.8–35.1). Between-study variability was related to the magnitude of the association with stronger relationships in larger studies at low risk of bias and with unselected populations with multiple routine blood pressure measurements. None of the systolic blood pressure measurements of <120 mmHg, <130/80 mmHg, or <140/90 mmHg were useful to rule out the development of preeclampsia (all negative likelihood ratios >0.2). Only a blood pressure measurement of ≥140/90 mmHg was a good predictor for the development of preeclampsia (positive likelihood ratio, 5.95). The findings were similar for other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although a blood pressure of 120 to 140 over 80 to 90 mmHg at <20 weeks gestation is associated with a heightened risk for preeclampsia and adverse pregnancy outcomes and may assist in risk prediction in multivariable modelling, lowering the diagnostic threshold for chronic hypertension would not assist clinicians in identifying women at heightened risk. Elsevier 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10239058/ /pubmed/36241079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.004 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Slade, Laura J.
Mistry, Hiten D.
Bone, Jeffrey N.
Wilson, Milly
Blackman, Maya
Syeda, Nuhaat
von Dadelszen, Peter
Magee, Laura A.
American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure categories—a systematic review of the relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes in the first half of pregnancy
title American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure categories—a systematic review of the relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes in the first half of pregnancy
title_full American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure categories—a systematic review of the relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes in the first half of pregnancy
title_fullStr American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure categories—a systematic review of the relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes in the first half of pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure categories—a systematic review of the relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes in the first half of pregnancy
title_short American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure categories—a systematic review of the relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes in the first half of pregnancy
title_sort american college of cardiology and american heart association blood pressure categories—a systematic review of the relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes in the first half of pregnancy
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36241079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.004
work_keys_str_mv AT sladelauraj americancollegeofcardiologyandamericanheartassociationbloodpressurecategoriesasystematicreviewoftherelationshipwithadversepregnancyoutcomesinthefirsthalfofpregnancy
AT mistryhitend americancollegeofcardiologyandamericanheartassociationbloodpressurecategoriesasystematicreviewoftherelationshipwithadversepregnancyoutcomesinthefirsthalfofpregnancy
AT bonejeffreyn americancollegeofcardiologyandamericanheartassociationbloodpressurecategoriesasystematicreviewoftherelationshipwithadversepregnancyoutcomesinthefirsthalfofpregnancy
AT wilsonmilly americancollegeofcardiologyandamericanheartassociationbloodpressurecategoriesasystematicreviewoftherelationshipwithadversepregnancyoutcomesinthefirsthalfofpregnancy
AT blackmanmaya americancollegeofcardiologyandamericanheartassociationbloodpressurecategoriesasystematicreviewoftherelationshipwithadversepregnancyoutcomesinthefirsthalfofpregnancy
AT syedanuhaat americancollegeofcardiologyandamericanheartassociationbloodpressurecategoriesasystematicreviewoftherelationshipwithadversepregnancyoutcomesinthefirsthalfofpregnancy
AT vondadelszenpeter americancollegeofcardiologyandamericanheartassociationbloodpressurecategoriesasystematicreviewoftherelationshipwithadversepregnancyoutcomesinthefirsthalfofpregnancy
AT mageelauraa americancollegeofcardiologyandamericanheartassociationbloodpressurecategoriesasystematicreviewoftherelationshipwithadversepregnancyoutcomesinthefirsthalfofpregnancy