Cargando…
Incorporating economic methods into Cochrane systematic reviews: case studies in brain tumour research
BACKGROUND: Cochrane systematic reviews have established methods for identifying and critically appraising empirical evidence in health. In addition to evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of interventions, the resource implications of such interventions can have a huge impact on a decision...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37268981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02254-w |
_version_ | 1785053426955059200 |
---|---|
author | Kernohan, Ashleigh Robinson, Tomos Vale, Luke |
author_facet | Kernohan, Ashleigh Robinson, Tomos Vale, Luke |
author_sort | Kernohan, Ashleigh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cochrane systematic reviews have established methods for identifying and critically appraising empirical evidence in health. In addition to evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of interventions, the resource implications of such interventions can have a huge impact on a decision maker’s ability to adopt and implement them. In this paper, we present examples of the three approaches to include economic evidence in Cochrane reviews. METHODS: The Cochrane Handbook presents three different methods of integrating economic evidence into reviews: the Brief Economic Commentary (BEC), the Integrated Full Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations (IFSREE) and using an Economic Decision Model. Using the examples from three different systematic reviews in the field of brain cancer, we utilised each method to address three different research questions. A BEC was utilised in a review that evaluates the long-term side effects of radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy). An IFSREE was utilised in a review comparing different treatment strategies for newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly. Finally, an economic model was included in a review assessing diagnostic test accuracy for tests of codeletion of chromosomal arms in people with glioma. RESULTS: The BEC mirrored the results of the main review and found a paucity of quality evidence with regard to the side effects of radiotherapy in those with glioma. The IFSREE identified a single economic evaluation regarding glioblastoma in the elderly, but this study had a number of methodological issues. The economic model identified a number of potentially cost-effective strategies for tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma. CONCLUSIONS: There are strengths and limitations of each approach for integrating economic evidence in Cochrane systematic reviews. The type of research question, resources available and study timeline should be considered when choosing which approach to use when integrating economic evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10239097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102390972023-06-04 Incorporating economic methods into Cochrane systematic reviews: case studies in brain tumour research Kernohan, Ashleigh Robinson, Tomos Vale, Luke Syst Rev Methodology BACKGROUND: Cochrane systematic reviews have established methods for identifying and critically appraising empirical evidence in health. In addition to evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of interventions, the resource implications of such interventions can have a huge impact on a decision maker’s ability to adopt and implement them. In this paper, we present examples of the three approaches to include economic evidence in Cochrane reviews. METHODS: The Cochrane Handbook presents three different methods of integrating economic evidence into reviews: the Brief Economic Commentary (BEC), the Integrated Full Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations (IFSREE) and using an Economic Decision Model. Using the examples from three different systematic reviews in the field of brain cancer, we utilised each method to address three different research questions. A BEC was utilised in a review that evaluates the long-term side effects of radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy). An IFSREE was utilised in a review comparing different treatment strategies for newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly. Finally, an economic model was included in a review assessing diagnostic test accuracy for tests of codeletion of chromosomal arms in people with glioma. RESULTS: The BEC mirrored the results of the main review and found a paucity of quality evidence with regard to the side effects of radiotherapy in those with glioma. The IFSREE identified a single economic evaluation regarding glioblastoma in the elderly, but this study had a number of methodological issues. The economic model identified a number of potentially cost-effective strategies for tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma. CONCLUSIONS: There are strengths and limitations of each approach for integrating economic evidence in Cochrane systematic reviews. The type of research question, resources available and study timeline should be considered when choosing which approach to use when integrating economic evidence. BioMed Central 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10239097/ /pubmed/37268981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02254-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Kernohan, Ashleigh Robinson, Tomos Vale, Luke Incorporating economic methods into Cochrane systematic reviews: case studies in brain tumour research |
title | Incorporating economic methods into Cochrane systematic reviews: case studies in brain tumour research |
title_full | Incorporating economic methods into Cochrane systematic reviews: case studies in brain tumour research |
title_fullStr | Incorporating economic methods into Cochrane systematic reviews: case studies in brain tumour research |
title_full_unstemmed | Incorporating economic methods into Cochrane systematic reviews: case studies in brain tumour research |
title_short | Incorporating economic methods into Cochrane systematic reviews: case studies in brain tumour research |
title_sort | incorporating economic methods into cochrane systematic reviews: case studies in brain tumour research |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37268981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02254-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kernohanashleigh incorporatingeconomicmethodsintocochranesystematicreviewscasestudiesinbraintumourresearch AT robinsontomos incorporatingeconomicmethodsintocochranesystematicreviewscasestudiesinbraintumourresearch AT valeluke incorporatingeconomicmethodsintocochranesystematicreviewscasestudiesinbraintumourresearch |