Cargando…

Central-line associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units before and after implementation of daily antiseptic bathing with chlorhexidine or octenidine: a post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUNDS: Antiseptic bathing did not reduce central-line (CL) associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in intensive care units (ICU) according to a recent cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT). However, this analysis did not consider baseline infection rates. Our post-hoc analysis of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Denkel, Luisa A., Schwab, Frank, Clausmeyer, Jörg, Behnke, Michael, Golembus, Jennifer, Wolke, Solvy, Gastmeier, Petra, Geffers, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37270604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01260-w
_version_ 1785053448895463424
author Denkel, Luisa A.
Schwab, Frank
Clausmeyer, Jörg
Behnke, Michael
Golembus, Jennifer
Wolke, Solvy
Gastmeier, Petra
Geffers, Christine
author_facet Denkel, Luisa A.
Schwab, Frank
Clausmeyer, Jörg
Behnke, Michael
Golembus, Jennifer
Wolke, Solvy
Gastmeier, Petra
Geffers, Christine
author_sort Denkel, Luisa A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS: Antiseptic bathing did not reduce central-line (CL) associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in intensive care units (ICU) according to a recent cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT). However, this analysis did not consider baseline infection rates. Our post-hoc analysis of this cRCT aimed to use a before-after comparison to examine the effect of daily bathing with chlorhexidine, octenidine or water and soap (control) on ICU-attributable CLABSI rates. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of a multi-center cRCT was done. ICUs that did not yet perform routine antiseptic bathing were randomly assigned to one of three study groups applying daily bathing with 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated cloths, 0.08% octenidine wash mitts or water and soap (control) for 12 months. Baseline data was assessed 12 months before the intervention started when all ICUs routinely used water and soap. Poisson regression and generalised estimating equation models were applied to identify changes of CLABSI rates per 1000 CL days between intervention and baseline periods in each study group. RESULTS: The cRCT was conducted in 72 ICUs (24 per study group) including 76,139 patients in the baseline and 76,815 patients in the intervention period. In the chlorhexidine group, incidence density of CLABSI was reduced from 1.48 to 0.90 CLABSI per 1000 CL days comparing baseline versus intervention period (P = 0.0085). No reduction was observed in the octenidine group (1.26 versus 1.47 CLABSI per 1000 CL days, P = 0.8735) and the control group (1.20 versus 1.17, P = 0.3298). Adjusted incidence rate ratios (intervention versus baseline) were 0.63 (95%CI 0.46–0.87, P = 0.0172) in the chlorhexidine, 1.17 (95% CI 0.79–1.72, P = 0.5111) in the octenidine and 0.98 (95% CI 0.60–1.58, P = 0.9190) in the control group. Chlorhexidine bathing reduced CLABSI with gram-positive bacteria, mainly coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). CONCLUSIONS: In this post-hoc analysis of a cRCT, the application of 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated cloths reduced ICU-attributable CLABSI. This preventive effect of chlorhexidine was restricted to CLABSI caused by gram-positive pathogens (CoNS). In contrast, 0.08% octenidine wash mitts did not reduce CLABSI rates in ICUs. Trial registration Registration number DRKS00010475, registration date August 18, 2016. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-023-01260-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10239202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102392022023-06-04 Central-line associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units before and after implementation of daily antiseptic bathing with chlorhexidine or octenidine: a post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial Denkel, Luisa A. Schwab, Frank Clausmeyer, Jörg Behnke, Michael Golembus, Jennifer Wolke, Solvy Gastmeier, Petra Geffers, Christine Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUNDS: Antiseptic bathing did not reduce central-line (CL) associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in intensive care units (ICU) according to a recent cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT). However, this analysis did not consider baseline infection rates. Our post-hoc analysis of this cRCT aimed to use a before-after comparison to examine the effect of daily bathing with chlorhexidine, octenidine or water and soap (control) on ICU-attributable CLABSI rates. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of a multi-center cRCT was done. ICUs that did not yet perform routine antiseptic bathing were randomly assigned to one of three study groups applying daily bathing with 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated cloths, 0.08% octenidine wash mitts or water and soap (control) for 12 months. Baseline data was assessed 12 months before the intervention started when all ICUs routinely used water and soap. Poisson regression and generalised estimating equation models were applied to identify changes of CLABSI rates per 1000 CL days between intervention and baseline periods in each study group. RESULTS: The cRCT was conducted in 72 ICUs (24 per study group) including 76,139 patients in the baseline and 76,815 patients in the intervention period. In the chlorhexidine group, incidence density of CLABSI was reduced from 1.48 to 0.90 CLABSI per 1000 CL days comparing baseline versus intervention period (P = 0.0085). No reduction was observed in the octenidine group (1.26 versus 1.47 CLABSI per 1000 CL days, P = 0.8735) and the control group (1.20 versus 1.17, P = 0.3298). Adjusted incidence rate ratios (intervention versus baseline) were 0.63 (95%CI 0.46–0.87, P = 0.0172) in the chlorhexidine, 1.17 (95% CI 0.79–1.72, P = 0.5111) in the octenidine and 0.98 (95% CI 0.60–1.58, P = 0.9190) in the control group. Chlorhexidine bathing reduced CLABSI with gram-positive bacteria, mainly coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). CONCLUSIONS: In this post-hoc analysis of a cRCT, the application of 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated cloths reduced ICU-attributable CLABSI. This preventive effect of chlorhexidine was restricted to CLABSI caused by gram-positive pathogens (CoNS). In contrast, 0.08% octenidine wash mitts did not reduce CLABSI rates in ICUs. Trial registration Registration number DRKS00010475, registration date August 18, 2016. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-023-01260-w. BioMed Central 2023-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10239202/ /pubmed/37270604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01260-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Denkel, Luisa A.
Schwab, Frank
Clausmeyer, Jörg
Behnke, Michael
Golembus, Jennifer
Wolke, Solvy
Gastmeier, Petra
Geffers, Christine
Central-line associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units before and after implementation of daily antiseptic bathing with chlorhexidine or octenidine: a post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
title Central-line associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units before and after implementation of daily antiseptic bathing with chlorhexidine or octenidine: a post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_full Central-line associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units before and after implementation of daily antiseptic bathing with chlorhexidine or octenidine: a post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Central-line associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units before and after implementation of daily antiseptic bathing with chlorhexidine or octenidine: a post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Central-line associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units before and after implementation of daily antiseptic bathing with chlorhexidine or octenidine: a post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_short Central-line associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units before and after implementation of daily antiseptic bathing with chlorhexidine or octenidine: a post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_sort central-line associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units before and after implementation of daily antiseptic bathing with chlorhexidine or octenidine: a post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37270604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01260-w
work_keys_str_mv AT denkelluisaa centrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionsinintensivecareunitsbeforeandafterimplementationofdailyantisepticbathingwithchlorhexidineoroctenidineaposthocanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schwabfrank centrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionsinintensivecareunitsbeforeandafterimplementationofdailyantisepticbathingwithchlorhexidineoroctenidineaposthocanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clausmeyerjorg centrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionsinintensivecareunitsbeforeandafterimplementationofdailyantisepticbathingwithchlorhexidineoroctenidineaposthocanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT behnkemichael centrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionsinintensivecareunitsbeforeandafterimplementationofdailyantisepticbathingwithchlorhexidineoroctenidineaposthocanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT golembusjennifer centrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionsinintensivecareunitsbeforeandafterimplementationofdailyantisepticbathingwithchlorhexidineoroctenidineaposthocanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wolkesolvy centrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionsinintensivecareunitsbeforeandafterimplementationofdailyantisepticbathingwithchlorhexidineoroctenidineaposthocanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gastmeierpetra centrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionsinintensivecareunitsbeforeandafterimplementationofdailyantisepticbathingwithchlorhexidineoroctenidineaposthocanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gefferschristine centrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionsinintensivecareunitsbeforeandafterimplementationofdailyantisepticbathingwithchlorhexidineoroctenidineaposthocanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT centrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionsinintensivecareunitsbeforeandafterimplementationofdailyantisepticbathingwithchlorhexidineoroctenidineaposthocanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial