Cargando…
Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest
Computer-assisted navigation system (CAS) and robotic assisted surgery (RAS) have been widely used in joint arthroplasty, but few studies focused on public interest. We aimed to evaluate current trend and seasonality of public interest in CAS and RAS arthroplasty over the past 10 years, and forecast...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37270445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01630-x |
_version_ | 1785053468634906624 |
---|---|
author | Gao, Jiaxiang Xing, Dan Li, Jiaojiao Li, Tong Huang, Cheng Wang, Weiguo |
author_facet | Gao, Jiaxiang Xing, Dan Li, Jiaojiao Li, Tong Huang, Cheng Wang, Weiguo |
author_sort | Gao, Jiaxiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Computer-assisted navigation system (CAS) and robotic assisted surgery (RAS) have been widely used in joint arthroplasty, but few studies focused on public interest. We aimed to evaluate current trend and seasonality of public interest in CAS and RAS arthroplasty over the past 10 years, and forecast the future development. All data related to CAS or RAS arthroplasty from January 2012 to December 2021 were collected through Google Trends. Public interest was described by relative search volume (RSV). Pre-existing trend was evaluated by linear and exponential models. Time series analysis and ARIMA model were utilized to analyze the seasonality and future trend. R software 3.5.0 was for statistics analysis. Public interest in RAS arthroplasty has been continuously increasing (P < 0.001) and exponential model (R(2) = 0.83, MAE = 7.35, MAPE = 34%, RSME = 9.58) fitted better than linear one (R(2) = 0.78, MAE = 8.44, MAPE = 42%, RSME = 10.67). CAS arthroplasty showed a downtrend (P < 0.01) with equivalent R(2) (0.04) and accuracy measures (MAE = 3.92, MAPE = 31%, RSME = 4.95). The greatest popularity of RAS was observed in July and October, while the lowest was in March and December. For CAS, a rise of public interest was in May and October, but lower values were observed in January and November. Based on ARIMA models, the popularity of RAS might continuously increase and nearly double in 2030, along with a stability with slight downtrend for CAS. Public interest in RAS arthroplasty has been continuously increasing and seems to maintain this uptrend in the next 10 years, whereas popularity of CAS arthroplasty will likely remain stable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10239277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102392772023-06-06 Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest Gao, Jiaxiang Xing, Dan Li, Jiaojiao Li, Tong Huang, Cheng Wang, Weiguo J Robot Surg Research Computer-assisted navigation system (CAS) and robotic assisted surgery (RAS) have been widely used in joint arthroplasty, but few studies focused on public interest. We aimed to evaluate current trend and seasonality of public interest in CAS and RAS arthroplasty over the past 10 years, and forecast the future development. All data related to CAS or RAS arthroplasty from January 2012 to December 2021 were collected through Google Trends. Public interest was described by relative search volume (RSV). Pre-existing trend was evaluated by linear and exponential models. Time series analysis and ARIMA model were utilized to analyze the seasonality and future trend. R software 3.5.0 was for statistics analysis. Public interest in RAS arthroplasty has been continuously increasing (P < 0.001) and exponential model (R(2) = 0.83, MAE = 7.35, MAPE = 34%, RSME = 9.58) fitted better than linear one (R(2) = 0.78, MAE = 8.44, MAPE = 42%, RSME = 10.67). CAS arthroplasty showed a downtrend (P < 0.01) with equivalent R(2) (0.04) and accuracy measures (MAE = 3.92, MAPE = 31%, RSME = 4.95). The greatest popularity of RAS was observed in July and October, while the lowest was in March and December. For CAS, a rise of public interest was in May and October, but lower values were observed in January and November. Based on ARIMA models, the popularity of RAS might continuously increase and nearly double in 2030, along with a stability with slight downtrend for CAS. Public interest in RAS arthroplasty has been continuously increasing and seems to maintain this uptrend in the next 10 years, whereas popularity of CAS arthroplasty will likely remain stable. Springer London 2023-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10239277/ /pubmed/37270445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01630-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Research Gao, Jiaxiang Xing, Dan Li, Jiaojiao Li, Tong Huang, Cheng Wang, Weiguo Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest |
title | Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest |
title_full | Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest |
title_fullStr | Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest |
title_full_unstemmed | Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest |
title_short | Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest |
title_sort | is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? a google trends analysis from the point of public interest |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37270445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01630-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaojiaxiang isroboticassistancemoreeyecatchingthancomputernavigationinjointarthroplastyagoogletrendsanalysisfromthepointofpublicinterest AT xingdan isroboticassistancemoreeyecatchingthancomputernavigationinjointarthroplastyagoogletrendsanalysisfromthepointofpublicinterest AT lijiaojiao isroboticassistancemoreeyecatchingthancomputernavigationinjointarthroplastyagoogletrendsanalysisfromthepointofpublicinterest AT litong isroboticassistancemoreeyecatchingthancomputernavigationinjointarthroplastyagoogletrendsanalysisfromthepointofpublicinterest AT huangcheng isroboticassistancemoreeyecatchingthancomputernavigationinjointarthroplastyagoogletrendsanalysisfromthepointofpublicinterest AT wangweiguo isroboticassistancemoreeyecatchingthancomputernavigationinjointarthroplastyagoogletrendsanalysisfromthepointofpublicinterest |