Cargando…

Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest

Computer-assisted navigation system (CAS) and robotic assisted surgery (RAS) have been widely used in joint arthroplasty, but few studies focused on public interest. We aimed to evaluate current trend and seasonality of public interest in CAS and RAS arthroplasty over the past 10 years, and forecast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Jiaxiang, Xing, Dan, Li, Jiaojiao, Li, Tong, Huang, Cheng, Wang, Weiguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37270445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01630-x
_version_ 1785053468634906624
author Gao, Jiaxiang
Xing, Dan
Li, Jiaojiao
Li, Tong
Huang, Cheng
Wang, Weiguo
author_facet Gao, Jiaxiang
Xing, Dan
Li, Jiaojiao
Li, Tong
Huang, Cheng
Wang, Weiguo
author_sort Gao, Jiaxiang
collection PubMed
description Computer-assisted navigation system (CAS) and robotic assisted surgery (RAS) have been widely used in joint arthroplasty, but few studies focused on public interest. We aimed to evaluate current trend and seasonality of public interest in CAS and RAS arthroplasty over the past 10 years, and forecast the future development. All data related to CAS or RAS arthroplasty from January 2012 to December 2021 were collected through Google Trends. Public interest was described by relative search volume (RSV). Pre-existing trend was evaluated by linear and exponential models. Time series analysis and ARIMA model were utilized to analyze the seasonality and future trend. R software 3.5.0 was for statistics analysis. Public interest in RAS arthroplasty has been continuously increasing (P < 0.001) and exponential model (R(2) = 0.83, MAE = 7.35, MAPE = 34%, RSME = 9.58) fitted better than linear one (R(2) = 0.78, MAE = 8.44, MAPE = 42%, RSME = 10.67). CAS arthroplasty showed a downtrend (P < 0.01) with equivalent R(2) (0.04) and accuracy measures (MAE = 3.92, MAPE = 31%, RSME = 4.95). The greatest popularity of RAS was observed in July and October, while the lowest was in March and December. For CAS, a rise of public interest was in May and October, but lower values were observed in January and November. Based on ARIMA models, the popularity of RAS might continuously increase and nearly double in 2030, along with a stability with slight downtrend for CAS. Public interest in RAS arthroplasty has been continuously increasing and seems to maintain this uptrend in the next 10 years, whereas popularity of CAS arthroplasty will likely remain stable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10239277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102392772023-06-06 Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest Gao, Jiaxiang Xing, Dan Li, Jiaojiao Li, Tong Huang, Cheng Wang, Weiguo J Robot Surg Research Computer-assisted navigation system (CAS) and robotic assisted surgery (RAS) have been widely used in joint arthroplasty, but few studies focused on public interest. We aimed to evaluate current trend and seasonality of public interest in CAS and RAS arthroplasty over the past 10 years, and forecast the future development. All data related to CAS or RAS arthroplasty from January 2012 to December 2021 were collected through Google Trends. Public interest was described by relative search volume (RSV). Pre-existing trend was evaluated by linear and exponential models. Time series analysis and ARIMA model were utilized to analyze the seasonality and future trend. R software 3.5.0 was for statistics analysis. Public interest in RAS arthroplasty has been continuously increasing (P < 0.001) and exponential model (R(2) = 0.83, MAE = 7.35, MAPE = 34%, RSME = 9.58) fitted better than linear one (R(2) = 0.78, MAE = 8.44, MAPE = 42%, RSME = 10.67). CAS arthroplasty showed a downtrend (P < 0.01) with equivalent R(2) (0.04) and accuracy measures (MAE = 3.92, MAPE = 31%, RSME = 4.95). The greatest popularity of RAS was observed in July and October, while the lowest was in March and December. For CAS, a rise of public interest was in May and October, but lower values were observed in January and November. Based on ARIMA models, the popularity of RAS might continuously increase and nearly double in 2030, along with a stability with slight downtrend for CAS. Public interest in RAS arthroplasty has been continuously increasing and seems to maintain this uptrend in the next 10 years, whereas popularity of CAS arthroplasty will likely remain stable. Springer London 2023-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10239277/ /pubmed/37270445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01630-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Research
Gao, Jiaxiang
Xing, Dan
Li, Jiaojiao
Li, Tong
Huang, Cheng
Wang, Weiguo
Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest
title Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest
title_full Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest
title_fullStr Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest
title_full_unstemmed Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest
title_short Is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? A Google trends analysis from the point of public interest
title_sort is robotic assistance more eye-catching than computer navigation in joint arthroplasty? a google trends analysis from the point of public interest
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37270445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01630-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gaojiaxiang isroboticassistancemoreeyecatchingthancomputernavigationinjointarthroplastyagoogletrendsanalysisfromthepointofpublicinterest
AT xingdan isroboticassistancemoreeyecatchingthancomputernavigationinjointarthroplastyagoogletrendsanalysisfromthepointofpublicinterest
AT lijiaojiao isroboticassistancemoreeyecatchingthancomputernavigationinjointarthroplastyagoogletrendsanalysisfromthepointofpublicinterest
AT litong isroboticassistancemoreeyecatchingthancomputernavigationinjointarthroplastyagoogletrendsanalysisfromthepointofpublicinterest
AT huangcheng isroboticassistancemoreeyecatchingthancomputernavigationinjointarthroplastyagoogletrendsanalysisfromthepointofpublicinterest
AT wangweiguo isroboticassistancemoreeyecatchingthancomputernavigationinjointarthroplastyagoogletrendsanalysisfromthepointofpublicinterest