Cargando…
Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing
The presence in nature of species showing drastic differences in lifespan and cancer incidence has recently increased the interest of the scientific community. In particular, the adaptations and the genomic features underlying the evolution of cancer-resistant and long-lived organisms have recently...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37270634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36006-6 |
_version_ | 1785053497945751552 |
---|---|
author | Ricci, Marco Peona, Valentina Boattini, Alessio Taccioli, Cristian |
author_facet | Ricci, Marco Peona, Valentina Boattini, Alessio Taccioli, Cristian |
author_sort | Ricci, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | The presence in nature of species showing drastic differences in lifespan and cancer incidence has recently increased the interest of the scientific community. In particular, the adaptations and the genomic features underlying the evolution of cancer-resistant and long-lived organisms have recently focused on transposable elements (TEs). In this study, we compared the content and dynamics of TE activity in the genomes of four rodent and six bat species exhibiting different lifespans and cancer susceptibility. Mouse, rat, and guinea pig genomes (short-lived and cancer-prone organisms) were compared with that of naked mole rat (Heterocephalus glaber) which is a cancer-resistant organism and the rodent with the longest lifespan. The long-lived bats of the genera Myotis, Rhinolophus, Pteropus and Rousettus were instead compared with Molossus molossus, which is one of the organisms with the shortest lifespan among the order Chiroptera. Despite previous hypotheses stating a substantial tolerance of TEs in bats, we found that long-lived bats and the naked mole rat share a marked decrease of non-LTR retrotransposons (LINEs and SINEs) accumulation in recent evolutionary times. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10239488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102394882023-06-05 Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing Ricci, Marco Peona, Valentina Boattini, Alessio Taccioli, Cristian Sci Rep Article The presence in nature of species showing drastic differences in lifespan and cancer incidence has recently increased the interest of the scientific community. In particular, the adaptations and the genomic features underlying the evolution of cancer-resistant and long-lived organisms have recently focused on transposable elements (TEs). In this study, we compared the content and dynamics of TE activity in the genomes of four rodent and six bat species exhibiting different lifespans and cancer susceptibility. Mouse, rat, and guinea pig genomes (short-lived and cancer-prone organisms) were compared with that of naked mole rat (Heterocephalus glaber) which is a cancer-resistant organism and the rodent with the longest lifespan. The long-lived bats of the genera Myotis, Rhinolophus, Pteropus and Rousettus were instead compared with Molossus molossus, which is one of the organisms with the shortest lifespan among the order Chiroptera. Despite previous hypotheses stating a substantial tolerance of TEs in bats, we found that long-lived bats and the naked mole rat share a marked decrease of non-LTR retrotransposons (LINEs and SINEs) accumulation in recent evolutionary times. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10239488/ /pubmed/37270634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36006-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Ricci, Marco Peona, Valentina Boattini, Alessio Taccioli, Cristian Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing |
title | Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing |
title_full | Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing |
title_short | Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing |
title_sort | comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-ltr retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37270634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36006-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riccimarco comparativeanalysisofbatsandrodentsgenomessuggestsarelationbetweennonltrretrotransposonscancerincidenceandageing AT peonavalentina comparativeanalysisofbatsandrodentsgenomessuggestsarelationbetweennonltrretrotransposonscancerincidenceandageing AT boattinialessio comparativeanalysisofbatsandrodentsgenomessuggestsarelationbetweennonltrretrotransposonscancerincidenceandageing AT tacciolicristian comparativeanalysisofbatsandrodentsgenomessuggestsarelationbetweennonltrretrotransposonscancerincidenceandageing |