Cargando…

Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing

The presence in nature of species showing drastic differences in lifespan and cancer incidence has recently increased the interest of the scientific community. In particular, the adaptations and the genomic features underlying the evolution of cancer-resistant and long-lived organisms have recently...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ricci, Marco, Peona, Valentina, Boattini, Alessio, Taccioli, Cristian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37270634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36006-6
_version_ 1785053497945751552
author Ricci, Marco
Peona, Valentina
Boattini, Alessio
Taccioli, Cristian
author_facet Ricci, Marco
Peona, Valentina
Boattini, Alessio
Taccioli, Cristian
author_sort Ricci, Marco
collection PubMed
description The presence in nature of species showing drastic differences in lifespan and cancer incidence has recently increased the interest of the scientific community. In particular, the adaptations and the genomic features underlying the evolution of cancer-resistant and long-lived organisms have recently focused on transposable elements (TEs). In this study, we compared the content and dynamics of TE activity in the genomes of four rodent and six bat species exhibiting different lifespans and cancer susceptibility. Mouse, rat, and guinea pig genomes (short-lived and cancer-prone organisms) were compared with that of naked mole rat (Heterocephalus glaber) which is a cancer-resistant organism and the rodent with the longest lifespan. The long-lived bats of the genera Myotis, Rhinolophus, Pteropus and Rousettus were instead compared with Molossus molossus, which is one of the organisms with the shortest lifespan among the order Chiroptera. Despite previous hypotheses stating a substantial tolerance of TEs in bats, we found that long-lived bats and the naked mole rat share a marked decrease of non-LTR retrotransposons (LINEs and SINEs) accumulation in recent evolutionary times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10239488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102394882023-06-05 Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing Ricci, Marco Peona, Valentina Boattini, Alessio Taccioli, Cristian Sci Rep Article The presence in nature of species showing drastic differences in lifespan and cancer incidence has recently increased the interest of the scientific community. In particular, the adaptations and the genomic features underlying the evolution of cancer-resistant and long-lived organisms have recently focused on transposable elements (TEs). In this study, we compared the content and dynamics of TE activity in the genomes of four rodent and six bat species exhibiting different lifespans and cancer susceptibility. Mouse, rat, and guinea pig genomes (short-lived and cancer-prone organisms) were compared with that of naked mole rat (Heterocephalus glaber) which is a cancer-resistant organism and the rodent with the longest lifespan. The long-lived bats of the genera Myotis, Rhinolophus, Pteropus and Rousettus were instead compared with Molossus molossus, which is one of the organisms with the shortest lifespan among the order Chiroptera. Despite previous hypotheses stating a substantial tolerance of TEs in bats, we found that long-lived bats and the naked mole rat share a marked decrease of non-LTR retrotransposons (LINEs and SINEs) accumulation in recent evolutionary times. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10239488/ /pubmed/37270634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36006-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ricci, Marco
Peona, Valentina
Boattini, Alessio
Taccioli, Cristian
Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing
title Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing
title_full Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing
title_short Comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing
title_sort comparative analysis of bats and rodents’ genomes suggests a relation between non-ltr retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37270634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36006-6
work_keys_str_mv AT riccimarco comparativeanalysisofbatsandrodentsgenomessuggestsarelationbetweennonltrretrotransposonscancerincidenceandageing
AT peonavalentina comparativeanalysisofbatsandrodentsgenomessuggestsarelationbetweennonltrretrotransposonscancerincidenceandageing
AT boattinialessio comparativeanalysisofbatsandrodentsgenomessuggestsarelationbetweennonltrretrotransposonscancerincidenceandageing
AT tacciolicristian comparativeanalysisofbatsandrodentsgenomessuggestsarelationbetweennonltrretrotransposonscancerincidenceandageing