Cargando…

Validation of Quantitative Ultrasonography for Osteoporosis Diagnosis in Postmenopausal Women Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA)

Introduction Bone mineral density (BMD) is an essential indicator for diagnosing osteoporosis and evaluating the success of osteoporotic treatment. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), quantitative ultrasonography (QUS), and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) are frequently used for measurin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kushwaha, Narendra S, Singh, Arpit, Kumar, Sanjiv, Kumar, Dharmendra, Bharat, Abhinav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284400
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38562
_version_ 1785053507120791552
author Kushwaha, Narendra S
Singh, Arpit
Kumar, Sanjiv
Kumar, Dharmendra
Bharat, Abhinav
author_facet Kushwaha, Narendra S
Singh, Arpit
Kumar, Sanjiv
Kumar, Dharmendra
Bharat, Abhinav
author_sort Kushwaha, Narendra S
collection PubMed
description Introduction Bone mineral density (BMD) is an essential indicator for diagnosing osteoporosis and evaluating the success of osteoporotic treatment. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), quantitative ultrasonography (QUS), and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) are frequently used for measuring BMD. The objective of the study was to evaluate the ability of QUS to screen for osteoporosis and bone density in postmenopausal women by calibrating it against DEXA.  Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Center of the tertiary care center, Lucknow. A total of 90 patients visited this department from August 2017 to July 2018 for the present study. BMD in the same patient was evaluated by using DEXA and ultrasonography methods. Data were entered in Microsoft Excel and analyzed by using SPSS Software.  Results According to linear regression analysis, T neck was found statistically significant with T QUS (p<0.001) and z QUS (p<0.001). T lumbar and T wrist were found statistically significant with T QUS (p<0.001) but not with z QUS (p>0.001). Z neck was found statistically significant with T QUS (p<0.001) and z QUS (p<0.001). Z lumbar was found statistically significant with T QUS (p<0.001) but not with z QUS (p>0.005). Z wrist was not found statistically significant with T QUS (p>0.005) or with z QUS (p>0.005). Conclusion In the present study, we found that QUS can be used as a screening tool for detecting osteoporosis by measuring BMD in contrast to DEXA. QUS also can be used to predict the DEXA values for osteoporosis and to detect osteoporosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10239533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102395332023-06-05 Validation of Quantitative Ultrasonography for Osteoporosis Diagnosis in Postmenopausal Women Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Kushwaha, Narendra S Singh, Arpit Kumar, Sanjiv Kumar, Dharmendra Bharat, Abhinav Cureus Orthopedics Introduction Bone mineral density (BMD) is an essential indicator for diagnosing osteoporosis and evaluating the success of osteoporotic treatment. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), quantitative ultrasonography (QUS), and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) are frequently used for measuring BMD. The objective of the study was to evaluate the ability of QUS to screen for osteoporosis and bone density in postmenopausal women by calibrating it against DEXA.  Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Center of the tertiary care center, Lucknow. A total of 90 patients visited this department from August 2017 to July 2018 for the present study. BMD in the same patient was evaluated by using DEXA and ultrasonography methods. Data were entered in Microsoft Excel and analyzed by using SPSS Software.  Results According to linear regression analysis, T neck was found statistically significant with T QUS (p<0.001) and z QUS (p<0.001). T lumbar and T wrist were found statistically significant with T QUS (p<0.001) but not with z QUS (p>0.001). Z neck was found statistically significant with T QUS (p<0.001) and z QUS (p<0.001). Z lumbar was found statistically significant with T QUS (p<0.001) but not with z QUS (p>0.005). Z wrist was not found statistically significant with T QUS (p>0.005) or with z QUS (p>0.005). Conclusion In the present study, we found that QUS can be used as a screening tool for detecting osteoporosis by measuring BMD in contrast to DEXA. QUS also can be used to predict the DEXA values for osteoporosis and to detect osteoporosis. Cureus 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10239533/ /pubmed/37284400 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38562 Text en Copyright © 2023, Kushwaha et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Kushwaha, Narendra S
Singh, Arpit
Kumar, Sanjiv
Kumar, Dharmendra
Bharat, Abhinav
Validation of Quantitative Ultrasonography for Osteoporosis Diagnosis in Postmenopausal Women Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA)
title Validation of Quantitative Ultrasonography for Osteoporosis Diagnosis in Postmenopausal Women Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA)
title_full Validation of Quantitative Ultrasonography for Osteoporosis Diagnosis in Postmenopausal Women Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA)
title_fullStr Validation of Quantitative Ultrasonography for Osteoporosis Diagnosis in Postmenopausal Women Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA)
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Quantitative Ultrasonography for Osteoporosis Diagnosis in Postmenopausal Women Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA)
title_short Validation of Quantitative Ultrasonography for Osteoporosis Diagnosis in Postmenopausal Women Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA)
title_sort validation of quantitative ultrasonography for osteoporosis diagnosis in postmenopausal women compared to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (dexa)
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284400
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38562
work_keys_str_mv AT kushwahanarendras validationofquantitativeultrasonographyforosteoporosisdiagnosisinpostmenopausalwomencomparedtodualenergyxrayabsorptiometrydexa
AT singharpit validationofquantitativeultrasonographyforosteoporosisdiagnosisinpostmenopausalwomencomparedtodualenergyxrayabsorptiometrydexa
AT kumarsanjiv validationofquantitativeultrasonographyforosteoporosisdiagnosisinpostmenopausalwomencomparedtodualenergyxrayabsorptiometrydexa
AT kumardharmendra validationofquantitativeultrasonographyforosteoporosisdiagnosisinpostmenopausalwomencomparedtodualenergyxrayabsorptiometrydexa
AT bharatabhinav validationofquantitativeultrasonographyforosteoporosisdiagnosisinpostmenopausalwomencomparedtodualenergyxrayabsorptiometrydexa