Cargando…

Rapid identification of sepsis in the emergency department

OBJECTIVES: Recent research has helped define the complex pathways in sepsis, affording new opportunities for advancing diagnostics tests. Given significant advances in the field, a group of academic investigators from emergency medicine, intensive care, pathology, and pharmacology assembled to deve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraus, Chadd K., Nguyen, H. Bryant, Jacobsen, Ryan C., Ledeboer, Nathan A., May, Larissa S., O'Neal, Hollis R., Puskarich, Michael A., Rice, Todd W., Self, Wesley H., Rothman, Richard E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12984
_version_ 1785053509548244992
author Kraus, Chadd K.
Nguyen, H. Bryant
Jacobsen, Ryan C.
Ledeboer, Nathan A.
May, Larissa S.
O'Neal, Hollis R.
Puskarich, Michael A.
Rice, Todd W.
Self, Wesley H.
Rothman, Richard E.
author_facet Kraus, Chadd K.
Nguyen, H. Bryant
Jacobsen, Ryan C.
Ledeboer, Nathan A.
May, Larissa S.
O'Neal, Hollis R.
Puskarich, Michael A.
Rice, Todd W.
Self, Wesley H.
Rothman, Richard E.
author_sort Kraus, Chadd K.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Recent research has helped define the complex pathways in sepsis, affording new opportunities for advancing diagnostics tests. Given significant advances in the field, a group of academic investigators from emergency medicine, intensive care, pathology, and pharmacology assembled to develop consensus around key gaps and potential future use for emerging rapid host response diagnostics assays in the emergency department (ED) setting. METHODS: A modified Delphi study was conducted that included 26 panelists (expert consensus panel) from multiple specialties. A smaller steering committee first defined a list of Delphi statements related to the need for and future potential use of a hypothetical sepsis diagnostic test in the ED. Likert scoring was used to assess panelists agreement or disagreement with statements. Two successive rounds of surveys were conducted and consensus for statements was operationally defined as achieving agreement or disagreement of 75% or greater. RESULTS: Significant gaps were identified related to current tools for assessing risk of sepsis in the ED. Strong consensus indicated the need for a test providing an indication of the severity of dysregulated host immune response, which would be helpful even if it did not identify the specific pathogen. Although there was a relatively high degree of uncertainty regarding which patients would most benefit from the test, the panel agreed that an ideal host response sepsis test should aim to be integrated into ED triage and thus should produce results in less than 30 minutes. The panel also agreed that such a test would be most valuable for improving sepsis outcomes and reducing rates of unnecessary antibiotic use. CONCLUSION: The expert consensus panel expressed strong consensus regarding gaps in sepsis diagnostics in the ED and the potential for new rapid host response tests to help fill these gaps. These finding provide a baseline framework for assessing key attributes of evolving host response diagnostic tests for sepsis in the ED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10239543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102395432023-06-05 Rapid identification of sepsis in the emergency department Kraus, Chadd K. Nguyen, H. Bryant Jacobsen, Ryan C. Ledeboer, Nathan A. May, Larissa S. O'Neal, Hollis R. Puskarich, Michael A. Rice, Todd W. Self, Wesley H. Rothman, Richard E. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Infectious Disease OBJECTIVES: Recent research has helped define the complex pathways in sepsis, affording new opportunities for advancing diagnostics tests. Given significant advances in the field, a group of academic investigators from emergency medicine, intensive care, pathology, and pharmacology assembled to develop consensus around key gaps and potential future use for emerging rapid host response diagnostics assays in the emergency department (ED) setting. METHODS: A modified Delphi study was conducted that included 26 panelists (expert consensus panel) from multiple specialties. A smaller steering committee first defined a list of Delphi statements related to the need for and future potential use of a hypothetical sepsis diagnostic test in the ED. Likert scoring was used to assess panelists agreement or disagreement with statements. Two successive rounds of surveys were conducted and consensus for statements was operationally defined as achieving agreement or disagreement of 75% or greater. RESULTS: Significant gaps were identified related to current tools for assessing risk of sepsis in the ED. Strong consensus indicated the need for a test providing an indication of the severity of dysregulated host immune response, which would be helpful even if it did not identify the specific pathogen. Although there was a relatively high degree of uncertainty regarding which patients would most benefit from the test, the panel agreed that an ideal host response sepsis test should aim to be integrated into ED triage and thus should produce results in less than 30 minutes. The panel also agreed that such a test would be most valuable for improving sepsis outcomes and reducing rates of unnecessary antibiotic use. CONCLUSION: The expert consensus panel expressed strong consensus regarding gaps in sepsis diagnostics in the ED and the potential for new rapid host response tests to help fill these gaps. These finding provide a baseline framework for assessing key attributes of evolving host response diagnostic tests for sepsis in the ED. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10239543/ /pubmed/37284425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12984 Text en © 2023 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Emergency Physicians. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Infectious Disease
Kraus, Chadd K.
Nguyen, H. Bryant
Jacobsen, Ryan C.
Ledeboer, Nathan A.
May, Larissa S.
O'Neal, Hollis R.
Puskarich, Michael A.
Rice, Todd W.
Self, Wesley H.
Rothman, Richard E.
Rapid identification of sepsis in the emergency department
title Rapid identification of sepsis in the emergency department
title_full Rapid identification of sepsis in the emergency department
title_fullStr Rapid identification of sepsis in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Rapid identification of sepsis in the emergency department
title_short Rapid identification of sepsis in the emergency department
title_sort rapid identification of sepsis in the emergency department
topic Infectious Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12984
work_keys_str_mv AT krauschaddk rapididentificationofsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT nguyenhbryant rapididentificationofsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT jacobsenryanc rapididentificationofsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT ledeboernathana rapididentificationofsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT maylarissas rapididentificationofsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT onealhollisr rapididentificationofsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT puskarichmichaela rapididentificationofsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT ricetoddw rapididentificationofsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT selfwesleyh rapididentificationofsepsisintheemergencydepartment
AT rothmanricharde rapididentificationofsepsisintheemergencydepartment