Cargando…

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Rehabilitation Using Digital Healthcare on Musculoskeletal Pain and Quality of Life

Rehabilitation using digital healthcare (DHC) has the potential to enhance the effectiveness of treatment for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and associated pain by improving patient outcomes, while being cost-effective, safe, and measurable. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jang, Suhyun, Lee, Boram, Lee, Eunji, Kim, Jungbin, Lee, Jong In, Lim, Jae-Young, Hwang, Ji Hye, Jang, Sunmee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284324
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S388757
_version_ 1785053528190877696
author Jang, Suhyun
Lee, Boram
Lee, Eunji
Kim, Jungbin
Lee, Jong In
Lim, Jae-Young
Hwang, Ji Hye
Jang, Sunmee
author_facet Jang, Suhyun
Lee, Boram
Lee, Eunji
Kim, Jungbin
Lee, Jong In
Lim, Jae-Young
Hwang, Ji Hye
Jang, Sunmee
author_sort Jang, Suhyun
collection PubMed
description Rehabilitation using digital healthcare (DHC) has the potential to enhance the effectiveness of treatment for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and associated pain by improving patient outcomes, while being cost-effective, safe, and measurable. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of musculoskeletal rehabilitation using DHC. We searched PubMed, Ovid-Embase, Cochrane Library, and PEDro Physiotherapy Evidence Database from inception to October 28, 2022 for controlled clinical trials comparing DHC to conventional rehabilitation. We used a random-effects model for the meta-analysis, pooling the effects of DHC on pain and quality of life (QoL) by calculating standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between DHC rehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation (control). Fifty-four studies with 6240 participants met the inclusion criteria. The sample size ranged from 26 to 461, and the average age of the participants ranged from 21.9 to 71.8 years. The majority of the included studies focused on knee or hip joint MSD (n = 23), and the most frequently utilized DHC interventions were mobile applications (n = 26) and virtual or augmented reality (n = 16). Our meta-analysis of pain (n = 45) revealed that pain reduction was greater in DHC rehabilitation than in conventional rehabilitation (SMD: −0.55, 95% CI: −0.74, −0.36), indicating that rehabilitation using DHC has the potential to ameliorate MSD pain. Furthermore, DHC significantly improved health-related QoL and disease-specific QoL (SMD: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.29, 1.03; SMD: −0.44, 95% CI: −0.87, −0.01) compared to conventional rehabilitation. Our findings suggest that DHC offers a practical and flexible rehabilitation alternative for both patients with MSD and healthcare professionals. Nevertheless, further researches are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms by which DHC affects patient-reported outcomes, which may vary depending on the type and design of the DHC intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10239626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102396262023-06-05 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Rehabilitation Using Digital Healthcare on Musculoskeletal Pain and Quality of Life Jang, Suhyun Lee, Boram Lee, Eunji Kim, Jungbin Lee, Jong In Lim, Jae-Young Hwang, Ji Hye Jang, Sunmee J Pain Res Review Rehabilitation using digital healthcare (DHC) has the potential to enhance the effectiveness of treatment for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and associated pain by improving patient outcomes, while being cost-effective, safe, and measurable. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of musculoskeletal rehabilitation using DHC. We searched PubMed, Ovid-Embase, Cochrane Library, and PEDro Physiotherapy Evidence Database from inception to October 28, 2022 for controlled clinical trials comparing DHC to conventional rehabilitation. We used a random-effects model for the meta-analysis, pooling the effects of DHC on pain and quality of life (QoL) by calculating standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between DHC rehabilitation and conventional rehabilitation (control). Fifty-four studies with 6240 participants met the inclusion criteria. The sample size ranged from 26 to 461, and the average age of the participants ranged from 21.9 to 71.8 years. The majority of the included studies focused on knee or hip joint MSD (n = 23), and the most frequently utilized DHC interventions were mobile applications (n = 26) and virtual or augmented reality (n = 16). Our meta-analysis of pain (n = 45) revealed that pain reduction was greater in DHC rehabilitation than in conventional rehabilitation (SMD: −0.55, 95% CI: −0.74, −0.36), indicating that rehabilitation using DHC has the potential to ameliorate MSD pain. Furthermore, DHC significantly improved health-related QoL and disease-specific QoL (SMD: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.29, 1.03; SMD: −0.44, 95% CI: −0.87, −0.01) compared to conventional rehabilitation. Our findings suggest that DHC offers a practical and flexible rehabilitation alternative for both patients with MSD and healthcare professionals. Nevertheless, further researches are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms by which DHC affects patient-reported outcomes, which may vary depending on the type and design of the DHC intervention. Dove 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10239626/ /pubmed/37284324 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S388757 Text en © 2023 Jang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Jang, Suhyun
Lee, Boram
Lee, Eunji
Kim, Jungbin
Lee, Jong In
Lim, Jae-Young
Hwang, Ji Hye
Jang, Sunmee
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Rehabilitation Using Digital Healthcare on Musculoskeletal Pain and Quality of Life
title A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Rehabilitation Using Digital Healthcare on Musculoskeletal Pain and Quality of Life
title_full A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Rehabilitation Using Digital Healthcare on Musculoskeletal Pain and Quality of Life
title_fullStr A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Rehabilitation Using Digital Healthcare on Musculoskeletal Pain and Quality of Life
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Rehabilitation Using Digital Healthcare on Musculoskeletal Pain and Quality of Life
title_short A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Rehabilitation Using Digital Healthcare on Musculoskeletal Pain and Quality of Life
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of rehabilitation using digital healthcare on musculoskeletal pain and quality of life
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284324
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S388757
work_keys_str_mv AT jangsuhyun asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife
AT leeboram asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife
AT leeeunji asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife
AT kimjungbin asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife
AT leejongin asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife
AT limjaeyoung asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife
AT hwangjihye asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife
AT jangsunmee asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife
AT jangsuhyun systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife
AT leeboram systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife
AT leeeunji systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife
AT kimjungbin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife
AT leejongin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife
AT limjaeyoung systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife
AT hwangjihye systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife
AT jangsunmee systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectsofrehabilitationusingdigitalhealthcareonmusculoskeletalpainandqualityoflife