Comparative study of the quantitative accuracy of oncological PET imaging based on deep learning methods

BACKGROUND: [(18)F] Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is an important tool for tumor assessment. Shortening scanning time and reducing the amount of radioactive tracer remain the most difficult challenges. Deep learning methods have provided powerful solutions, thus making it important to choose an appropriate neural network architecture. METHODS: A total of 311 tumor patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively collected. The PET collection time was 3 min/bed. The first 15 and 30 s of each bed collection time were selected to simulate low-dose collection, and the pre-90s was used as the clinical standard protocol. Low-dose PET was used as input, convolutional neural network (CNN, 3D Unet as representative) and generative adversarial network (GAN, P2P as representative) were used to predict the full-dose images. The image visual scores, noise levels and quantitative parameters of tumor tissue were compared. RESULTS: There was high consistency in image quality scores among all groups [Kappa =0.719, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.697–0.741, P<0.001]. There were 264 cases (3D Unet-15s), 311 cases (3D Unet-30s), 89 cases (P2P-15s) and 247 cases (P2P-30s) with image quality score ≥3, respectively. There was significant difference in the score composition among all groups (χ(2)=1,325.46, P<0.001). Both deep learning models reduced the standard deviation (SD) of background, and increased the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). When 8%PET images were used as input, P2P and 3D Unet had similar enhancement effect on SNR of tumor lesions, but 3D Unet could significantly improve the contrast-noise ratio (CNR) (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in SUVmean of tumor lesions compared with s-PET group (P>0.05). When 17%PET image was used as input, SNR, CNR and SUVmax of tumor lesion of 3D Unet group had no statistical difference with those of s-PET group (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both GAN and CNN can suppress image noise to varying degrees and improve image quality. However, when 3D Unet reduces the noise of tumor lesions, it can improve the CNR of tumor lesions. Moreover, quantitative parameters of tumor tissue are similar to those under the standard acquisition protocol, which can meet the needs of clinical diagnosis.