Cargando…

Preoperative imaging of clinically relevant intrathoracic abnormalities in pectus excavatum patients

BACKGROUND: Preoperative radiological imaging in pectus excavatum sometimes coincidentally yields additional intrathoracic abnormalities. In the context of a larger research project investigating replacement of CT scans by 3D-surface scanning as routine preoperative work-up for pectus excavatum, thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janssen, Nicky, Daemen, Jean H. T., Michels, Iris L., Franssen, Aimée J. P. M., Maessen, Jos G., Hulsewé, Karel W. E., Vissers, Yvonne L. J., de Loos, Erik R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284105
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-1366
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Preoperative radiological imaging in pectus excavatum sometimes coincidentally yields additional intrathoracic abnormalities. In the context of a larger research project investigating replacement of CT scans by 3D-surface scanning as routine preoperative work-up for pectus excavatum, this study aims to quantify the incidence of clinically relevant intrathoracic abnormalities found incidentally using conventional CT in pectus excavatum patients. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted including pectus excavatum patients, receiving CT between 2012 and 2021 as part of their preoperative evaluation. Radiology reports were reviewed for additional intrathoracic abnormalities and scored into three subclasses: non-clinically relevant, potentially clinically relevant or clinically relevant findings. Also, two-view plain chest radiographs reports, if available, were evaluated for those patients with a clinically relevant finding. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare adolescents and adults. RESULTS: In total, 382 patients were included, of whom 117 were adolescents. Although in 41 patients (11%) an additional intrathoracic abnormality was found, only two patients (0.5%) presented with a clinically relevant abnormality requiring additional diagnostics, postponing surgical correction. In only one of the two patients, plain chest radiographs were available, which did not show the abnormality. Subgroup analyses revealed no differences in (potentially) clinically relevant abnormalities between adolescents and adults. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of clinically relevant intrathoracic abnormalities in pectus excavatum patients was low, supporting the notion that CT and plain radiographs can be safely replaced by 3D-surface scanning in the preoperative work-up for pectus excavatum repair.