Cargando…
A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India
Providing quality cardiovascular disease (CVD) care in low resource setting requires understanding of priority and effective interventions. This study aimed to identify and prioritize evidence-based quality improvement strategies for CVD care in India using a modified two-round Delphi process in whi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43477-023-00087-2 |
_version_ | 1785053679053701120 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Kavita Joshi, Awantika Venkateshmurthy, Nikhil Srinivasapura Rahul, Rahul Huffman, Mark D. Tandon, Nikhil Prabhakaran, Dorairaj |
author_facet | Singh, Kavita Joshi, Awantika Venkateshmurthy, Nikhil Srinivasapura Rahul, Rahul Huffman, Mark D. Tandon, Nikhil Prabhakaran, Dorairaj |
author_sort | Singh, Kavita |
collection | PubMed |
description | Providing quality cardiovascular disease (CVD) care in low resource setting requires understanding of priority and effective interventions. This study aimed to identify and prioritize evidence-based quality improvement strategies for CVD care in India using a modified two-round Delphi process in which, we asked 46 experts (clinicians, researchers, program implementers and policy makers) to rate 25 proven CVD care strategies grouped into: (1) patient support, (2) information communication technology (ICT) for health, (3) group problem solving, (4) training, and (5) multicomponent strategy on a scale of 1 (highest/best)—5 (lowest/worst) on priority, relative advantage, and feasibility. Subsequently, we convened an expert consensus panel of 32 members to deliberate and achieve consensus regarding the prioritized set of strategies for CVD care. The Delphi study found that group problem solving strategies achieved the best score for priority (1.80) but fared poorly on feasibility (2.88). Compared to others, multicomponent strategies were rated favorably across all domains (priority = 1.84, relative advantage = 1.94, and feasibility = 2.40). The ICT for health strategies achieved the worst scores for priority = 2.01, relative advantage = 2.31, and feasibility = 2.85. Training and patient support strategies scored moderately across all domains. The expert panel narrowed the selection of a multicomponent strategy consisting of (1) electronic health records with clinical decision-support system, (2) non-physician health worker facilitated care, (3) patient education materials, (4) text-message based reminders for healthy lifestyle, and (5) audit and feedback report for providers. Future research will evaluate the real-world feasibility and effectiveness of the multicomponent strategy in patients with CVD in a low- and middle-income country setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-023-00087-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10240122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102401222023-06-06 A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India Singh, Kavita Joshi, Awantika Venkateshmurthy, Nikhil Srinivasapura Rahul, Rahul Huffman, Mark D. Tandon, Nikhil Prabhakaran, Dorairaj Glob Implement Res Appl Original Article Providing quality cardiovascular disease (CVD) care in low resource setting requires understanding of priority and effective interventions. This study aimed to identify and prioritize evidence-based quality improvement strategies for CVD care in India using a modified two-round Delphi process in which, we asked 46 experts (clinicians, researchers, program implementers and policy makers) to rate 25 proven CVD care strategies grouped into: (1) patient support, (2) information communication technology (ICT) for health, (3) group problem solving, (4) training, and (5) multicomponent strategy on a scale of 1 (highest/best)—5 (lowest/worst) on priority, relative advantage, and feasibility. Subsequently, we convened an expert consensus panel of 32 members to deliberate and achieve consensus regarding the prioritized set of strategies for CVD care. The Delphi study found that group problem solving strategies achieved the best score for priority (1.80) but fared poorly on feasibility (2.88). Compared to others, multicomponent strategies were rated favorably across all domains (priority = 1.84, relative advantage = 1.94, and feasibility = 2.40). The ICT for health strategies achieved the worst scores for priority = 2.01, relative advantage = 2.31, and feasibility = 2.85. Training and patient support strategies scored moderately across all domains. The expert panel narrowed the selection of a multicomponent strategy consisting of (1) electronic health records with clinical decision-support system, (2) non-physician health worker facilitated care, (3) patient education materials, (4) text-message based reminders for healthy lifestyle, and (5) audit and feedback report for providers. Future research will evaluate the real-world feasibility and effectiveness of the multicomponent strategy in patients with CVD in a low- and middle-income country setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-023-00087-2. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10240122/ /pubmed/37363377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43477-023-00087-2 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Singh, Kavita Joshi, Awantika Venkateshmurthy, Nikhil Srinivasapura Rahul, Rahul Huffman, Mark D. Tandon, Nikhil Prabhakaran, Dorairaj A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India |
title | A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India |
title_full | A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India |
title_fullStr | A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India |
title_full_unstemmed | A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India |
title_short | A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India |
title_sort | delphi study to prioritize evidence-based strategies for cardiovascular disease care in india |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43477-023-00087-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhkavita adelphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia AT joshiawantika adelphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia AT venkateshmurthynikhilsrinivasapura adelphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia AT rahulrahul adelphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia AT huffmanmarkd adelphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia AT tandonnikhil adelphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia AT prabhakarandorairaj adelphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia AT singhkavita delphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia AT joshiawantika delphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia AT venkateshmurthynikhilsrinivasapura delphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia AT rahulrahul delphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia AT huffmanmarkd delphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia AT tandonnikhil delphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia AT prabhakarandorairaj delphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia |