Cargando…

A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India

Providing quality cardiovascular disease (CVD) care in low resource setting requires understanding of priority and effective interventions. This study aimed to identify and prioritize evidence-based quality improvement strategies for CVD care in India using a modified two-round Delphi process in whi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Kavita, Joshi, Awantika, Venkateshmurthy, Nikhil Srinivasapura, Rahul, Rahul, Huffman, Mark D., Tandon, Nikhil, Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43477-023-00087-2
_version_ 1785053679053701120
author Singh, Kavita
Joshi, Awantika
Venkateshmurthy, Nikhil Srinivasapura
Rahul, Rahul
Huffman, Mark D.
Tandon, Nikhil
Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
author_facet Singh, Kavita
Joshi, Awantika
Venkateshmurthy, Nikhil Srinivasapura
Rahul, Rahul
Huffman, Mark D.
Tandon, Nikhil
Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
author_sort Singh, Kavita
collection PubMed
description Providing quality cardiovascular disease (CVD) care in low resource setting requires understanding of priority and effective interventions. This study aimed to identify and prioritize evidence-based quality improvement strategies for CVD care in India using a modified two-round Delphi process in which, we asked 46 experts (clinicians, researchers, program implementers and policy makers) to rate 25 proven CVD care strategies grouped into: (1) patient support, (2) information communication technology (ICT) for health, (3) group problem solving, (4) training, and (5) multicomponent strategy on a scale of 1 (highest/best)—5 (lowest/worst) on priority, relative advantage, and feasibility. Subsequently, we convened an expert consensus panel of 32 members to deliberate and achieve consensus regarding the prioritized set of strategies for CVD care. The Delphi study found that group problem solving strategies achieved the best score for priority (1.80) but fared poorly on feasibility (2.88). Compared to others, multicomponent strategies were rated favorably across all domains (priority = 1.84, relative advantage = 1.94, and feasibility = 2.40). The ICT for health strategies achieved the worst scores for priority = 2.01, relative advantage = 2.31, and feasibility = 2.85. Training and patient support strategies scored moderately across all domains. The expert panel narrowed the selection of a multicomponent strategy consisting of (1) electronic health records with clinical decision-support system, (2) non-physician health worker facilitated care, (3) patient education materials, (4) text-message based reminders for healthy lifestyle, and (5) audit and feedback report for providers. Future research will evaluate the real-world feasibility and effectiveness of the multicomponent strategy in patients with CVD in a low- and middle-income country setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-023-00087-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10240122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102401222023-06-06 A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India Singh, Kavita Joshi, Awantika Venkateshmurthy, Nikhil Srinivasapura Rahul, Rahul Huffman, Mark D. Tandon, Nikhil Prabhakaran, Dorairaj Glob Implement Res Appl Original Article Providing quality cardiovascular disease (CVD) care in low resource setting requires understanding of priority and effective interventions. This study aimed to identify and prioritize evidence-based quality improvement strategies for CVD care in India using a modified two-round Delphi process in which, we asked 46 experts (clinicians, researchers, program implementers and policy makers) to rate 25 proven CVD care strategies grouped into: (1) patient support, (2) information communication technology (ICT) for health, (3) group problem solving, (4) training, and (5) multicomponent strategy on a scale of 1 (highest/best)—5 (lowest/worst) on priority, relative advantage, and feasibility. Subsequently, we convened an expert consensus panel of 32 members to deliberate and achieve consensus regarding the prioritized set of strategies for CVD care. The Delphi study found that group problem solving strategies achieved the best score for priority (1.80) but fared poorly on feasibility (2.88). Compared to others, multicomponent strategies were rated favorably across all domains (priority = 1.84, relative advantage = 1.94, and feasibility = 2.40). The ICT for health strategies achieved the worst scores for priority = 2.01, relative advantage = 2.31, and feasibility = 2.85. Training and patient support strategies scored moderately across all domains. The expert panel narrowed the selection of a multicomponent strategy consisting of (1) electronic health records with clinical decision-support system, (2) non-physician health worker facilitated care, (3) patient education materials, (4) text-message based reminders for healthy lifestyle, and (5) audit and feedback report for providers. Future research will evaluate the real-world feasibility and effectiveness of the multicomponent strategy in patients with CVD in a low- and middle-income country setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-023-00087-2. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10240122/ /pubmed/37363377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43477-023-00087-2 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Kavita
Joshi, Awantika
Venkateshmurthy, Nikhil Srinivasapura
Rahul, Rahul
Huffman, Mark D.
Tandon, Nikhil
Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India
title A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India
title_full A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India
title_fullStr A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India
title_full_unstemmed A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India
title_short A Delphi Study to Prioritize Evidence-Based Strategies for Cardiovascular Disease Care in India
title_sort delphi study to prioritize evidence-based strategies for cardiovascular disease care in india
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43477-023-00087-2
work_keys_str_mv AT singhkavita adelphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia
AT joshiawantika adelphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia
AT venkateshmurthynikhilsrinivasapura adelphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia
AT rahulrahul adelphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia
AT huffmanmarkd adelphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia
AT tandonnikhil adelphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia
AT prabhakarandorairaj adelphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia
AT singhkavita delphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia
AT joshiawantika delphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia
AT venkateshmurthynikhilsrinivasapura delphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia
AT rahulrahul delphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia
AT huffmanmarkd delphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia
AT tandonnikhil delphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia
AT prabhakarandorairaj delphistudytoprioritizeevidencebasedstrategiesforcardiovasculardiseasecareinindia