Cargando…

Integrating one-to-one peer support into psycho-oncological care in Germany: multi-perspective, mixed-methods evaluation of the isPO onco-guide service

PURPOSE: One-to-one peer supporters called isPO onco-guides (isPO OGs) are an integral part of the new German psycho-oncological form of care ‘integrated, cross-sectoral Psycho-Oncology’ (isPO), additionally to professional care. The isPO OGs are cancer survivors with experiential knowledge, offerin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salm, Sandra, Houwaart, Stefanie, Cecon-Stabel, Natalia, Dresen, Antje, Pfaff, Holger, Scholten, Nadine, Krieger, Theresia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37273104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04951-4
_version_ 1785053683931676672
author Salm, Sandra
Houwaart, Stefanie
Cecon-Stabel, Natalia
Dresen, Antje
Pfaff, Holger
Scholten, Nadine
Krieger, Theresia
author_facet Salm, Sandra
Houwaart, Stefanie
Cecon-Stabel, Natalia
Dresen, Antje
Pfaff, Holger
Scholten, Nadine
Krieger, Theresia
author_sort Salm, Sandra
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: One-to-one peer supporters called isPO onco-guides (isPO OGs) are an integral part of the new German psycho-oncological form of care ‘integrated, cross-sectoral Psycho-Oncology’ (isPO), additionally to professional care. The isPO OGs are cancer survivors with experiential knowledge, offering information on local support services and answering questions ‘all around cancer’ to newly diagnosed cancer patients. We aimed to evaluate the isPO OG service from three perspectives: patients, isPO OGs, and professional service providers. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was pursued. We conducted interviews and focus groups with the three person groups, and applied qualitative content analysis on the reported resources, processes and outcomes regarding the isPO OG service. Relations with patients’ utilisation and isPO OGs’ work satisfaction were identified with regression and correlation analyses of questionnaire and isPO care data. We compared isPO care networks (CN) with X(2)-tests or ANOVA. Qualitative and quantitative results were integrated during interpretation phase. RESULTS: Qualitatively, the three person groups agreed on the benefits of the isPO OG service. The implementation’s maturity differed between the CN concerning established processes and resource availability. Attitudes of professional service providers appeared to be crucial for patients’ utilisation of the isPO OG service. Quantitative results emphasised the differences between the CN. CONCLUSION: Beyond differences in the CN, the isPO OG service has two psychosocial benefits: providing relevant, reliable, and understandable information; and offering the encouraging example that surviving and living with cancer is possible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (No. DRKS00015326) on 30.10.2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-023-04951-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10240138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102401382023-06-06 Integrating one-to-one peer support into psycho-oncological care in Germany: multi-perspective, mixed-methods evaluation of the isPO onco-guide service Salm, Sandra Houwaart, Stefanie Cecon-Stabel, Natalia Dresen, Antje Pfaff, Holger Scholten, Nadine Krieger, Theresia J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Research PURPOSE: One-to-one peer supporters called isPO onco-guides (isPO OGs) are an integral part of the new German psycho-oncological form of care ‘integrated, cross-sectoral Psycho-Oncology’ (isPO), additionally to professional care. The isPO OGs are cancer survivors with experiential knowledge, offering information on local support services and answering questions ‘all around cancer’ to newly diagnosed cancer patients. We aimed to evaluate the isPO OG service from three perspectives: patients, isPO OGs, and professional service providers. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was pursued. We conducted interviews and focus groups with the three person groups, and applied qualitative content analysis on the reported resources, processes and outcomes regarding the isPO OG service. Relations with patients’ utilisation and isPO OGs’ work satisfaction were identified with regression and correlation analyses of questionnaire and isPO care data. We compared isPO care networks (CN) with X(2)-tests or ANOVA. Qualitative and quantitative results were integrated during interpretation phase. RESULTS: Qualitatively, the three person groups agreed on the benefits of the isPO OG service. The implementation’s maturity differed between the CN concerning established processes and resource availability. Attitudes of professional service providers appeared to be crucial for patients’ utilisation of the isPO OG service. Quantitative results emphasised the differences between the CN. CONCLUSION: Beyond differences in the CN, the isPO OG service has two psychosocial benefits: providing relevant, reliable, and understandable information; and offering the encouraging example that surviving and living with cancer is possible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (No. DRKS00015326) on 30.10.2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-023-04951-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10240138/ /pubmed/37273104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04951-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Salm, Sandra
Houwaart, Stefanie
Cecon-Stabel, Natalia
Dresen, Antje
Pfaff, Holger
Scholten, Nadine
Krieger, Theresia
Integrating one-to-one peer support into psycho-oncological care in Germany: multi-perspective, mixed-methods evaluation of the isPO onco-guide service
title Integrating one-to-one peer support into psycho-oncological care in Germany: multi-perspective, mixed-methods evaluation of the isPO onco-guide service
title_full Integrating one-to-one peer support into psycho-oncological care in Germany: multi-perspective, mixed-methods evaluation of the isPO onco-guide service
title_fullStr Integrating one-to-one peer support into psycho-oncological care in Germany: multi-perspective, mixed-methods evaluation of the isPO onco-guide service
title_full_unstemmed Integrating one-to-one peer support into psycho-oncological care in Germany: multi-perspective, mixed-methods evaluation of the isPO onco-guide service
title_short Integrating one-to-one peer support into psycho-oncological care in Germany: multi-perspective, mixed-methods evaluation of the isPO onco-guide service
title_sort integrating one-to-one peer support into psycho-oncological care in germany: multi-perspective, mixed-methods evaluation of the ispo onco-guide service
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37273104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04951-4
work_keys_str_mv AT salmsandra integratingonetoonepeersupportintopsychooncologicalcareingermanymultiperspectivemixedmethodsevaluationoftheispooncoguideservice
AT houwaartstefanie integratingonetoonepeersupportintopsychooncologicalcareingermanymultiperspectivemixedmethodsevaluationoftheispooncoguideservice
AT ceconstabelnatalia integratingonetoonepeersupportintopsychooncologicalcareingermanymultiperspectivemixedmethodsevaluationoftheispooncoguideservice
AT dresenantje integratingonetoonepeersupportintopsychooncologicalcareingermanymultiperspectivemixedmethodsevaluationoftheispooncoguideservice
AT pfaffholger integratingonetoonepeersupportintopsychooncologicalcareingermanymultiperspectivemixedmethodsevaluationoftheispooncoguideservice
AT scholtennadine integratingonetoonepeersupportintopsychooncologicalcareingermanymultiperspectivemixedmethodsevaluationoftheispooncoguideservice
AT kriegertheresia integratingonetoonepeersupportintopsychooncologicalcareingermanymultiperspectivemixedmethodsevaluationoftheispooncoguideservice