Cargando…

Current state of mobile health apps in endourology: a review of mobile platforms in marketplaces and literature

Several mobile healthcare (mHealth) apps are available in various marketplaces, but there is still concern about their accuracy, data safety, and regulation. The goal of this review was to critically analyze the mobile apps created for education, diagnosis, and medical and surgical treatment of pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Talyshinskii, Ali, Bakhman, Guliev, Hameed, BM Zeeshan, Pietropaolo, Amelia, Naik, Nithesh, Somani, Bhaskar K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231176368
_version_ 1785053788834365440
author Talyshinskii, Ali
Bakhman, Guliev
Hameed, BM Zeeshan
Pietropaolo, Amelia
Naik, Nithesh
Somani, Bhaskar K
author_facet Talyshinskii, Ali
Bakhman, Guliev
Hameed, BM Zeeshan
Pietropaolo, Amelia
Naik, Nithesh
Somani, Bhaskar K
author_sort Talyshinskii, Ali
collection PubMed
description Several mobile healthcare (mHealth) apps are available in various marketplaces, but there is still concern about their accuracy, data safety, and regulation. The goal of this review was to critically analyze the mobile apps created for education, diagnosis, and medical and surgical treatment of patients with kidney stone disease (KSD), as well as to assess the level of data security, the contribution of physicians in their development and adherence to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Medical Device Regulation (MDR) guidance. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed (September 2022), in the Apple App Store and Google Play store using relevant keywords and inclusion criteria. Information was extracted for the name of the app, primary and additional functionalities, release and last update, number of downloads, number of marks and average rating, Android/iOS compatibility, initial and in-app payments, data safety statement, physician involvement statement, and FDA/MDR guidance. A total of 986 apps and 222 articles were reviewed, of which based on the inclusion, 83 apps were finally analyzed. The apps were allocated to six categories about their primary purpose: education (n = 8), fluid trackers (n = 54), food content description and calculators (n = 11), diagnosis (n = 3), pre- and intra-operative application (n = 4), and stent trackers (n = 2). Of these apps, the number of apps supported for Android, iOS, and both of them were 36, 23, and 23, respectively. Despite a wide range of apps available for KSD, the participation of doctors in their development, data security, and functionality remains insufficient. Further development of mHealth should be carried out properly under the supervision of urological associations involving patient support groups, and these apps must be regularly updated for their content and data security.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10240556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102405562023-06-06 Current state of mobile health apps in endourology: a review of mobile platforms in marketplaces and literature Talyshinskii, Ali Bakhman, Guliev Hameed, BM Zeeshan Pietropaolo, Amelia Naik, Nithesh Somani, Bhaskar K Ther Adv Urol Review Several mobile healthcare (mHealth) apps are available in various marketplaces, but there is still concern about their accuracy, data safety, and regulation. The goal of this review was to critically analyze the mobile apps created for education, diagnosis, and medical and surgical treatment of patients with kidney stone disease (KSD), as well as to assess the level of data security, the contribution of physicians in their development and adherence to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Medical Device Regulation (MDR) guidance. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed (September 2022), in the Apple App Store and Google Play store using relevant keywords and inclusion criteria. Information was extracted for the name of the app, primary and additional functionalities, release and last update, number of downloads, number of marks and average rating, Android/iOS compatibility, initial and in-app payments, data safety statement, physician involvement statement, and FDA/MDR guidance. A total of 986 apps and 222 articles were reviewed, of which based on the inclusion, 83 apps were finally analyzed. The apps were allocated to six categories about their primary purpose: education (n = 8), fluid trackers (n = 54), food content description and calculators (n = 11), diagnosis (n = 3), pre- and intra-operative application (n = 4), and stent trackers (n = 2). Of these apps, the number of apps supported for Android, iOS, and both of them were 36, 23, and 23, respectively. Despite a wide range of apps available for KSD, the participation of doctors in their development, data security, and functionality remains insufficient. Further development of mHealth should be carried out properly under the supervision of urological associations involving patient support groups, and these apps must be regularly updated for their content and data security. SAGE Publications 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10240556/ /pubmed/37284592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231176368 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Talyshinskii, Ali
Bakhman, Guliev
Hameed, BM Zeeshan
Pietropaolo, Amelia
Naik, Nithesh
Somani, Bhaskar K
Current state of mobile health apps in endourology: a review of mobile platforms in marketplaces and literature
title Current state of mobile health apps in endourology: a review of mobile platforms in marketplaces and literature
title_full Current state of mobile health apps in endourology: a review of mobile platforms in marketplaces and literature
title_fullStr Current state of mobile health apps in endourology: a review of mobile platforms in marketplaces and literature
title_full_unstemmed Current state of mobile health apps in endourology: a review of mobile platforms in marketplaces and literature
title_short Current state of mobile health apps in endourology: a review of mobile platforms in marketplaces and literature
title_sort current state of mobile health apps in endourology: a review of mobile platforms in marketplaces and literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231176368
work_keys_str_mv AT talyshinskiiali currentstateofmobilehealthappsinendourologyareviewofmobileplatformsinmarketplacesandliterature
AT bakhmanguliev currentstateofmobilehealthappsinendourologyareviewofmobileplatformsinmarketplacesandliterature
AT hameedbmzeeshan currentstateofmobilehealthappsinendourologyareviewofmobileplatformsinmarketplacesandliterature
AT pietropaoloamelia currentstateofmobilehealthappsinendourologyareviewofmobileplatformsinmarketplacesandliterature
AT naiknithesh currentstateofmobilehealthappsinendourologyareviewofmobileplatformsinmarketplacesandliterature
AT somanibhaskark currentstateofmobilehealthappsinendourologyareviewofmobileplatformsinmarketplacesandliterature