Cargando…

Predictive Classification System for Low Back Pain Based on Unsupervised Clustering

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings are believed to be associated with low back pain (LBP). This study sought to develop a new predictive classification system for low back pain. METHOD: Normal subjects with repeated lumbar MRI scans were re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Lixia, Jiang, Chang, Gu, Lishu, Jiang, Mengying, Shi, Yuanlu, Qu, Qixun, Shen, Na, Shi, Weibin, Cao, Yuanwu, Chen, Zixian, Jiang, Chun, Feng, Zhenzhou, Shen, Linghao, Jiang, Xiaoxing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33896208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211001813
Descripción
Sumario:STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings are believed to be associated with low back pain (LBP). This study sought to develop a new predictive classification system for low back pain. METHOD: Normal subjects with repeated lumbar MRI scans were retrospectively enrolled. A new classification system, based on the radiological features on MRI, was developed using an unsupervised clustering method. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-nine subjects were included. Three distinguishable clusters were identified with unsupervised clustering that were significantly correlated with LBP (P = .017). The incidence of LBP was highest in cluster 3 (57.14%), nearly twice the incidence in cluster 1 (30.11%). There were obvious differences in the sagittal parameters among the 3 clusters. Cluster 3 had the smallest intervertebral height. Based on follow-up findings, 27% of subjects changed clusters. More subjects changed from cluster 1 to clusters 2 or 3 (14.5%) than changed from cluster 2 or cluster 3 to cluster 1 (5%). Participation in sport was more frequent in subjects who changed from cluster 3 to cluster 1. CONCLUSION: Using an unsupervised clustering method, we developed a new classification system comprising 3 clusters, which were significantly correlated with LBP. The prediction of LBP is independent of age and better than that based on individual sagittal parameters derived from MRI. A change in cluster during follow-up may partially predict lumbar degeneration. This study provides a new system for the prediction of LBP that should be useful for its diagnosis and treatment.