Cargando…
Budget impact analysis of a digital monitoring platform for COPD
BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive debilitating condition with frequent exacerbations that have a high burden for patients and society. Digital tools may help to reduce the economic burden for patients and payers by improving outcomes. The Propeller platform is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37271821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00443-x |
_version_ | 1785053830776356864 |
---|---|
author | Inocencio, Timothy J. Sterling, Kimberly L. Sayiner, Sibel Minshall, Michael E. Kaye, Leanne Hatipoğlu, Umur |
author_facet | Inocencio, Timothy J. Sterling, Kimberly L. Sayiner, Sibel Minshall, Michael E. Kaye, Leanne Hatipoğlu, Umur |
author_sort | Inocencio, Timothy J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive debilitating condition with frequent exacerbations that have a high burden for patients and society. Digital tools may help to reduce the economic burden for patients and payers by improving outcomes. The Propeller platform is a digital self-management tool that facilitates passive monitoring of inhaler medication utilization, potentially assisting the healthcare team to identify patients at risk of a COPD exacerbation who may require further intervention. This study estimated the budget impact of Propeller from commercial payer and Medicare fee-for-service payer perspectives. METHODS: An Excel-based model was used to estimate the budget impact of Propeller for COPD patients in commercial and Medicare population sizes of 5 million members. Data on prevalence, baseline healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and baseline use of rescue and controller inhaler medications with unit costs (adjusted to 2020 US dollars) were obtained from peer-reviewed literature. Data on reductions in HCRU during Propeller usage were based on direct evidence. Estimates for costs of remote monitoring were obtained from publicly available information. All patients were assumed to have insurance claims related to ongoing remote monitoring. RESULTS: The estimated number of annual eligible COPD patients for commercial and Medicare was 212,200 and 606,600, respectively. Propeller decreased costs by an estimated $2,475 (commercial) and $915 (Medicare) per enrolled patient. The greatest increase in expenditure was for remote monitoring related expenses. After accounting for estimated reductions in hospitalizations, emergency department visits and short-acting beta-agonist use, total net savings were approximately $1.60 and $1.70 per-member per-month for commercial and Medicare payers, respectively. CONCLUSION: Propeller is projected to be cost saving from both the commercial and Medicare payer perspectives. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-023-00443-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10240705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102407052023-06-06 Budget impact analysis of a digital monitoring platform for COPD Inocencio, Timothy J. Sterling, Kimberly L. Sayiner, Sibel Minshall, Michael E. Kaye, Leanne Hatipoğlu, Umur Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive debilitating condition with frequent exacerbations that have a high burden for patients and society. Digital tools may help to reduce the economic burden for patients and payers by improving outcomes. The Propeller platform is a digital self-management tool that facilitates passive monitoring of inhaler medication utilization, potentially assisting the healthcare team to identify patients at risk of a COPD exacerbation who may require further intervention. This study estimated the budget impact of Propeller from commercial payer and Medicare fee-for-service payer perspectives. METHODS: An Excel-based model was used to estimate the budget impact of Propeller for COPD patients in commercial and Medicare population sizes of 5 million members. Data on prevalence, baseline healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and baseline use of rescue and controller inhaler medications with unit costs (adjusted to 2020 US dollars) were obtained from peer-reviewed literature. Data on reductions in HCRU during Propeller usage were based on direct evidence. Estimates for costs of remote monitoring were obtained from publicly available information. All patients were assumed to have insurance claims related to ongoing remote monitoring. RESULTS: The estimated number of annual eligible COPD patients for commercial and Medicare was 212,200 and 606,600, respectively. Propeller decreased costs by an estimated $2,475 (commercial) and $915 (Medicare) per enrolled patient. The greatest increase in expenditure was for remote monitoring related expenses. After accounting for estimated reductions in hospitalizations, emergency department visits and short-acting beta-agonist use, total net savings were approximately $1.60 and $1.70 per-member per-month for commercial and Medicare payers, respectively. CONCLUSION: Propeller is projected to be cost saving from both the commercial and Medicare payer perspectives. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-023-00443-x. BioMed Central 2023-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10240705/ /pubmed/37271821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00443-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Inocencio, Timothy J. Sterling, Kimberly L. Sayiner, Sibel Minshall, Michael E. Kaye, Leanne Hatipoğlu, Umur Budget impact analysis of a digital monitoring platform for COPD |
title | Budget impact analysis of a digital monitoring platform for COPD |
title_full | Budget impact analysis of a digital monitoring platform for COPD |
title_fullStr | Budget impact analysis of a digital monitoring platform for COPD |
title_full_unstemmed | Budget impact analysis of a digital monitoring platform for COPD |
title_short | Budget impact analysis of a digital monitoring platform for COPD |
title_sort | budget impact analysis of a digital monitoring platform for copd |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37271821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00443-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inocenciotimothyj budgetimpactanalysisofadigitalmonitoringplatformforcopd AT sterlingkimberlyl budgetimpactanalysisofadigitalmonitoringplatformforcopd AT sayinersibel budgetimpactanalysisofadigitalmonitoringplatformforcopd AT minshallmichaele budgetimpactanalysisofadigitalmonitoringplatformforcopd AT kayeleanne budgetimpactanalysisofadigitalmonitoringplatformforcopd AT hatipogluumur budgetimpactanalysisofadigitalmonitoringplatformforcopd |