Cargando…

Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines

INTRODUCTION: Post-COVID-19 syndrome is associated with significant health and potential socioeconomic burden. Due to its novel nature, there is a lack of clarity over best practice for the rehabilitation of patients with ongoing or new symptoms following acute COVID-19 infection. We conducted a sys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marshall-Andon, Tess, Walsh, Sebastian, Berger-Gillam, Tara, Pari, Anees Ahmed Abdul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2021-000100
_version_ 1785053835072372736
author Marshall-Andon, Tess
Walsh, Sebastian
Berger-Gillam, Tara
Pari, Anees Ahmed Abdul
author_facet Marshall-Andon, Tess
Walsh, Sebastian
Berger-Gillam, Tara
Pari, Anees Ahmed Abdul
author_sort Marshall-Andon, Tess
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Post-COVID-19 syndrome is associated with significant health and potential socioeconomic burden. Due to its novel nature, there is a lack of clarity over best practice for the rehabilitation of patients with ongoing or new symptoms following acute COVID-19 infection. We conducted a systematic review of clinical and service guidelines for post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation. METHODS: This review was registered on PROSPERO and is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included guidelines formally published or endorsed by a recognised professional body, covering rehabilitation of people with symptoms following resolution of acute COVID-19 infection. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, NHS Evidence, MedRxiv, PsyArXiv and Google for terms related to COVID-19, rehabilitation and guideline. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, data extracted and quality assessed using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX tools for clinical guidelines and the AGREE-HS tool for service guidelines. We included guidelines of sufficient quality in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: We identified 12 790 articles, of which 37 guidelines (19 clinical only, 7 service only and 11 combined clinical and service) were included. Guidelines covered a range of countries, rehabilitation types, populations and rehabilitation settings. Synthesis of clinical guidelines (n=4) was structured following the patient pathway, from identification, to assessment, treatment and discharge, with consideration of specific patient groups. Synthesis of service guidelines (n=8) was structured according to the Donabedian framework. DISCUSSION: Though the available post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines were generally of poor quality, there was a high degree of consensus regarding the breadth of symptoms, the need for holistic assessment by a broad multidisciplinary team and person-centred care. There was less clarity on management options, measuring outcomes and discharge criteria. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021236049.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10240730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102407302023-07-12 Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines Marshall-Andon, Tess Walsh, Sebastian Berger-Gillam, Tara Pari, Anees Ahmed Abdul Integr Healthc J Review INTRODUCTION: Post-COVID-19 syndrome is associated with significant health and potential socioeconomic burden. Due to its novel nature, there is a lack of clarity over best practice for the rehabilitation of patients with ongoing or new symptoms following acute COVID-19 infection. We conducted a systematic review of clinical and service guidelines for post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation. METHODS: This review was registered on PROSPERO and is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included guidelines formally published or endorsed by a recognised professional body, covering rehabilitation of people with symptoms following resolution of acute COVID-19 infection. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, NHS Evidence, MedRxiv, PsyArXiv and Google for terms related to COVID-19, rehabilitation and guideline. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, data extracted and quality assessed using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX tools for clinical guidelines and the AGREE-HS tool for service guidelines. We included guidelines of sufficient quality in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: We identified 12 790 articles, of which 37 guidelines (19 clinical only, 7 service only and 11 combined clinical and service) were included. Guidelines covered a range of countries, rehabilitation types, populations and rehabilitation settings. Synthesis of clinical guidelines (n=4) was structured following the patient pathway, from identification, to assessment, treatment and discharge, with consideration of specific patient groups. Synthesis of service guidelines (n=8) was structured according to the Donabedian framework. DISCUSSION: Though the available post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines were generally of poor quality, there was a high degree of consensus regarding the breadth of symptoms, the need for holistic assessment by a broad multidisciplinary team and person-centred care. There was less clarity on management options, measuring outcomes and discharge criteria. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021236049. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10240730/ /pubmed/37440848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2021-000100 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Marshall-Andon, Tess
Walsh, Sebastian
Berger-Gillam, Tara
Pari, Anees Ahmed Abdul
Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines
title Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines
title_full Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines
title_fullStr Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines
title_short Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines
title_sort systematic review of post-covid-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2021-000100
work_keys_str_mv AT marshallandontess systematicreviewofpostcovid19syndromerehabilitationguidelines
AT walshsebastian systematicreviewofpostcovid19syndromerehabilitationguidelines
AT bergergillamtara systematicreviewofpostcovid19syndromerehabilitationguidelines
AT parianeesahmedabdul systematicreviewofpostcovid19syndromerehabilitationguidelines