Cargando…
Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines
INTRODUCTION: Post-COVID-19 syndrome is associated with significant health and potential socioeconomic burden. Due to its novel nature, there is a lack of clarity over best practice for the rehabilitation of patients with ongoing or new symptoms following acute COVID-19 infection. We conducted a sys...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2021-000100 |
_version_ | 1785053835072372736 |
---|---|
author | Marshall-Andon, Tess Walsh, Sebastian Berger-Gillam, Tara Pari, Anees Ahmed Abdul |
author_facet | Marshall-Andon, Tess Walsh, Sebastian Berger-Gillam, Tara Pari, Anees Ahmed Abdul |
author_sort | Marshall-Andon, Tess |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Post-COVID-19 syndrome is associated with significant health and potential socioeconomic burden. Due to its novel nature, there is a lack of clarity over best practice for the rehabilitation of patients with ongoing or new symptoms following acute COVID-19 infection. We conducted a systematic review of clinical and service guidelines for post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation. METHODS: This review was registered on PROSPERO and is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included guidelines formally published or endorsed by a recognised professional body, covering rehabilitation of people with symptoms following resolution of acute COVID-19 infection. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, NHS Evidence, MedRxiv, PsyArXiv and Google for terms related to COVID-19, rehabilitation and guideline. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, data extracted and quality assessed using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX tools for clinical guidelines and the AGREE-HS tool for service guidelines. We included guidelines of sufficient quality in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: We identified 12 790 articles, of which 37 guidelines (19 clinical only, 7 service only and 11 combined clinical and service) were included. Guidelines covered a range of countries, rehabilitation types, populations and rehabilitation settings. Synthesis of clinical guidelines (n=4) was structured following the patient pathway, from identification, to assessment, treatment and discharge, with consideration of specific patient groups. Synthesis of service guidelines (n=8) was structured according to the Donabedian framework. DISCUSSION: Though the available post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines were generally of poor quality, there was a high degree of consensus regarding the breadth of symptoms, the need for holistic assessment by a broad multidisciplinary team and person-centred care. There was less clarity on management options, measuring outcomes and discharge criteria. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021236049. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10240730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102407302023-07-12 Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines Marshall-Andon, Tess Walsh, Sebastian Berger-Gillam, Tara Pari, Anees Ahmed Abdul Integr Healthc J Review INTRODUCTION: Post-COVID-19 syndrome is associated with significant health and potential socioeconomic burden. Due to its novel nature, there is a lack of clarity over best practice for the rehabilitation of patients with ongoing or new symptoms following acute COVID-19 infection. We conducted a systematic review of clinical and service guidelines for post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation. METHODS: This review was registered on PROSPERO and is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included guidelines formally published or endorsed by a recognised professional body, covering rehabilitation of people with symptoms following resolution of acute COVID-19 infection. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, NHS Evidence, MedRxiv, PsyArXiv and Google for terms related to COVID-19, rehabilitation and guideline. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, data extracted and quality assessed using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX tools for clinical guidelines and the AGREE-HS tool for service guidelines. We included guidelines of sufficient quality in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: We identified 12 790 articles, of which 37 guidelines (19 clinical only, 7 service only and 11 combined clinical and service) were included. Guidelines covered a range of countries, rehabilitation types, populations and rehabilitation settings. Synthesis of clinical guidelines (n=4) was structured following the patient pathway, from identification, to assessment, treatment and discharge, with consideration of specific patient groups. Synthesis of service guidelines (n=8) was structured according to the Donabedian framework. DISCUSSION: Though the available post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines were generally of poor quality, there was a high degree of consensus regarding the breadth of symptoms, the need for holistic assessment by a broad multidisciplinary team and person-centred care. There was less clarity on management options, measuring outcomes and discharge criteria. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021236049. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10240730/ /pubmed/37440848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2021-000100 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Marshall-Andon, Tess Walsh, Sebastian Berger-Gillam, Tara Pari, Anees Ahmed Abdul Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines |
title | Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines |
title_full | Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines |
title_fullStr | Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines |
title_short | Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines |
title_sort | systematic review of post-covid-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2021-000100 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marshallandontess systematicreviewofpostcovid19syndromerehabilitationguidelines AT walshsebastian systematicreviewofpostcovid19syndromerehabilitationguidelines AT bergergillamtara systematicreviewofpostcovid19syndromerehabilitationguidelines AT parianeesahmedabdul systematicreviewofpostcovid19syndromerehabilitationguidelines |