Cargando…

Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design

Despite the considerable uncertainty in predicting critical parameters of renewable energy systems, the uncertainty during system design is often marginally addressed and consistently underestimated. Therefore, the resulting designs are fragile, with suboptimal performances when reality deviates sig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coppitters, Diederik, Contino, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36379-8
_version_ 1785053923430629376
author Coppitters, Diederik
Contino, Francesco
author_facet Coppitters, Diederik
Contino, Francesco
author_sort Coppitters, Diederik
collection PubMed
description Despite the considerable uncertainty in predicting critical parameters of renewable energy systems, the uncertainty during system design is often marginally addressed and consistently underestimated. Therefore, the resulting designs are fragile, with suboptimal performances when reality deviates significantly from the predicted scenarios. To address this limitation, we propose an antifragile design optimization framework that redefines the indicator to optimize variability and introduces an antifragility indicator. The variability is optimized by favoring upside potential and providing downside protection towards a minimum acceptable performance, while the skewness indicates (anti)fragility. An antifragile design primarily enhances positive outcomes when the uncertainty of the random environment exceeds initial estimations. Hence, it circumvents the issue of underestimating the uncertainty in the operating environment. We applied the methodology to the design of a wind turbine for a community, considering the Levelized Cost Of Electricity (LCOE) as the quantity of interest. The design with optimized variability proves beneficial in 81% of the possible scenarios when compared to the conventional robust design. The antifragile design flourishes (LCOE drops by up to 120%) when the real-world uncertainty is higher than initially estimated in this paper. In conclusion, the framework provides a valid metric for optimizing the variability and detects promising antifragile design alternatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10241148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102411482023-06-06 Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design Coppitters, Diederik Contino, Francesco Sci Rep Article Despite the considerable uncertainty in predicting critical parameters of renewable energy systems, the uncertainty during system design is often marginally addressed and consistently underestimated. Therefore, the resulting designs are fragile, with suboptimal performances when reality deviates significantly from the predicted scenarios. To address this limitation, we propose an antifragile design optimization framework that redefines the indicator to optimize variability and introduces an antifragility indicator. The variability is optimized by favoring upside potential and providing downside protection towards a minimum acceptable performance, while the skewness indicates (anti)fragility. An antifragile design primarily enhances positive outcomes when the uncertainty of the random environment exceeds initial estimations. Hence, it circumvents the issue of underestimating the uncertainty in the operating environment. We applied the methodology to the design of a wind turbine for a community, considering the Levelized Cost Of Electricity (LCOE) as the quantity of interest. The design with optimized variability proves beneficial in 81% of the possible scenarios when compared to the conventional robust design. The antifragile design flourishes (LCOE drops by up to 120%) when the real-world uncertainty is higher than initially estimated in this paper. In conclusion, the framework provides a valid metric for optimizing the variability and detects promising antifragile design alternatives. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10241148/ /pubmed/37277455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36379-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Coppitters, Diederik
Contino, Francesco
Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design
title Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design
title_full Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design
title_fullStr Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design
title_short Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design
title_sort optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36379-8
work_keys_str_mv AT coppittersdiederik optimizingupsidevariabilityandantifragilityinrenewableenergysystemdesign
AT continofrancesco optimizingupsidevariabilityandantifragilityinrenewableenergysystemdesign