Cargando…
Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design
Despite the considerable uncertainty in predicting critical parameters of renewable energy systems, the uncertainty during system design is often marginally addressed and consistently underestimated. Therefore, the resulting designs are fragile, with suboptimal performances when reality deviates sig...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36379-8 |
_version_ | 1785053923430629376 |
---|---|
author | Coppitters, Diederik Contino, Francesco |
author_facet | Coppitters, Diederik Contino, Francesco |
author_sort | Coppitters, Diederik |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the considerable uncertainty in predicting critical parameters of renewable energy systems, the uncertainty during system design is often marginally addressed and consistently underestimated. Therefore, the resulting designs are fragile, with suboptimal performances when reality deviates significantly from the predicted scenarios. To address this limitation, we propose an antifragile design optimization framework that redefines the indicator to optimize variability and introduces an antifragility indicator. The variability is optimized by favoring upside potential and providing downside protection towards a minimum acceptable performance, while the skewness indicates (anti)fragility. An antifragile design primarily enhances positive outcomes when the uncertainty of the random environment exceeds initial estimations. Hence, it circumvents the issue of underestimating the uncertainty in the operating environment. We applied the methodology to the design of a wind turbine for a community, considering the Levelized Cost Of Electricity (LCOE) as the quantity of interest. The design with optimized variability proves beneficial in 81% of the possible scenarios when compared to the conventional robust design. The antifragile design flourishes (LCOE drops by up to 120%) when the real-world uncertainty is higher than initially estimated in this paper. In conclusion, the framework provides a valid metric for optimizing the variability and detects promising antifragile design alternatives. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10241148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102411482023-06-06 Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design Coppitters, Diederik Contino, Francesco Sci Rep Article Despite the considerable uncertainty in predicting critical parameters of renewable energy systems, the uncertainty during system design is often marginally addressed and consistently underestimated. Therefore, the resulting designs are fragile, with suboptimal performances when reality deviates significantly from the predicted scenarios. To address this limitation, we propose an antifragile design optimization framework that redefines the indicator to optimize variability and introduces an antifragility indicator. The variability is optimized by favoring upside potential and providing downside protection towards a minimum acceptable performance, while the skewness indicates (anti)fragility. An antifragile design primarily enhances positive outcomes when the uncertainty of the random environment exceeds initial estimations. Hence, it circumvents the issue of underestimating the uncertainty in the operating environment. We applied the methodology to the design of a wind turbine for a community, considering the Levelized Cost Of Electricity (LCOE) as the quantity of interest. The design with optimized variability proves beneficial in 81% of the possible scenarios when compared to the conventional robust design. The antifragile design flourishes (LCOE drops by up to 120%) when the real-world uncertainty is higher than initially estimated in this paper. In conclusion, the framework provides a valid metric for optimizing the variability and detects promising antifragile design alternatives. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10241148/ /pubmed/37277455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36379-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Coppitters, Diederik Contino, Francesco Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design |
title | Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design |
title_full | Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design |
title_fullStr | Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design |
title_short | Optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design |
title_sort | optimizing upside variability and antifragility in renewable energy system design |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36379-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coppittersdiederik optimizingupsidevariabilityandantifragilityinrenewableenergysystemdesign AT continofrancesco optimizingupsidevariabilityandantifragilityinrenewableenergysystemdesign |