Cargando…

The Value of Signaling an Orthopaedic Surgery Program: A Survey to Orthopaedic Surgery Programs

A new system was implemented by the Association of American Medical Colleges called the preference signaling program for the 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic surgery residency match. Applicants were able to signal 30 orthopaedic surgery programs to indicate high interest in a specific program. The purpose o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sorenson, Jacob C., Ryan, Patrick M., Ward, Russell A., Fornfeist, Douglas S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37276378
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00050
_version_ 1785053997314342912
author Sorenson, Jacob C.
Ryan, Patrick M.
Ward, Russell A.
Fornfeist, Douglas S.
author_facet Sorenson, Jacob C.
Ryan, Patrick M.
Ward, Russell A.
Fornfeist, Douglas S.
author_sort Sorenson, Jacob C.
collection PubMed
description A new system was implemented by the Association of American Medical Colleges called the preference signaling program for the 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic surgery residency match. Applicants were able to signal 30 orthopaedic surgery programs to indicate high interest in a specific program. The purpose of this study was to address how important signaling was to an orthopaedic surgery program this 2022 to 2023 application cycle. METHODS: A five-question survey was sent to orthopaedic surgery residency programs participating in the Electronic Residency Application Service this application cycle. Contact information was gathered through the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education residency website and program websites. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 69 of the 151 programs (46%) contacted. The average number of applicants per program was 727 (range, 372 to 1031, SD 155). Thirty-four of 61 respondents (56%) stated that 100% of their interviewees signaled their program. Fifty-five of 61 respondents (90%) indicated that their interviewee pool consisted of 75% or more applicants who signaled. Applicants who signaled had a 24.4% (range, 12.77 to 47.41, SD 8.04) chance of receiving an interview. Applicants who did not signal had just a 0.92% (range, 0 to 13.10, SD 2.08) chance of receiving an interview. Fifty-four of the 63 applicants (86%) answered that signaling played an important role in considering an applicant for an interview. CONCLUSION: Over half of the responding programs only interviewed applicants who signaled their program, and over 90% of programs' interview lists consisted of at least 75% of signaling applicants. Eighty-six percent of programs indicated that signaling played an important role in considering an applicant for an interview. Applicants who signaled were 26.5 times more likely to receive an interview than those who did not (P < 0.0001). With this information, applicants can narrow down their list of programs to apply to, knowing that their signal to a program will give them a better chance at receiving an interview.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10241500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102415002023-06-06 The Value of Signaling an Orthopaedic Surgery Program: A Survey to Orthopaedic Surgery Programs Sorenson, Jacob C. Ryan, Patrick M. Ward, Russell A. Fornfeist, Douglas S. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Review Article A new system was implemented by the Association of American Medical Colleges called the preference signaling program for the 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic surgery residency match. Applicants were able to signal 30 orthopaedic surgery programs to indicate high interest in a specific program. The purpose of this study was to address how important signaling was to an orthopaedic surgery program this 2022 to 2023 application cycle. METHODS: A five-question survey was sent to orthopaedic surgery residency programs participating in the Electronic Residency Application Service this application cycle. Contact information was gathered through the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education residency website and program websites. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 69 of the 151 programs (46%) contacted. The average number of applicants per program was 727 (range, 372 to 1031, SD 155). Thirty-four of 61 respondents (56%) stated that 100% of their interviewees signaled their program. Fifty-five of 61 respondents (90%) indicated that their interviewee pool consisted of 75% or more applicants who signaled. Applicants who signaled had a 24.4% (range, 12.77 to 47.41, SD 8.04) chance of receiving an interview. Applicants who did not signal had just a 0.92% (range, 0 to 13.10, SD 2.08) chance of receiving an interview. Fifty-four of the 63 applicants (86%) answered that signaling played an important role in considering an applicant for an interview. CONCLUSION: Over half of the responding programs only interviewed applicants who signaled their program, and over 90% of programs' interview lists consisted of at least 75% of signaling applicants. Eighty-six percent of programs indicated that signaling played an important role in considering an applicant for an interview. Applicants who signaled were 26.5 times more likely to receive an interview than those who did not (P < 0.0001). With this information, applicants can narrow down their list of programs to apply to, knowing that their signal to a program will give them a better chance at receiving an interview. Wolters Kluwer 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10241500/ /pubmed/37276378 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00050 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Sorenson, Jacob C.
Ryan, Patrick M.
Ward, Russell A.
Fornfeist, Douglas S.
The Value of Signaling an Orthopaedic Surgery Program: A Survey to Orthopaedic Surgery Programs
title The Value of Signaling an Orthopaedic Surgery Program: A Survey to Orthopaedic Surgery Programs
title_full The Value of Signaling an Orthopaedic Surgery Program: A Survey to Orthopaedic Surgery Programs
title_fullStr The Value of Signaling an Orthopaedic Surgery Program: A Survey to Orthopaedic Surgery Programs
title_full_unstemmed The Value of Signaling an Orthopaedic Surgery Program: A Survey to Orthopaedic Surgery Programs
title_short The Value of Signaling an Orthopaedic Surgery Program: A Survey to Orthopaedic Surgery Programs
title_sort value of signaling an orthopaedic surgery program: a survey to orthopaedic surgery programs
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37276378
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00050
work_keys_str_mv AT sorensonjacobc thevalueofsignalinganorthopaedicsurgeryprogramasurveytoorthopaedicsurgeryprograms
AT ryanpatrickm thevalueofsignalinganorthopaedicsurgeryprogramasurveytoorthopaedicsurgeryprograms
AT wardrussella thevalueofsignalinganorthopaedicsurgeryprogramasurveytoorthopaedicsurgeryprograms
AT fornfeistdouglass thevalueofsignalinganorthopaedicsurgeryprogramasurveytoorthopaedicsurgeryprograms
AT sorensonjacobc valueofsignalinganorthopaedicsurgeryprogramasurveytoorthopaedicsurgeryprograms
AT ryanpatrickm valueofsignalinganorthopaedicsurgeryprogramasurveytoorthopaedicsurgeryprograms
AT wardrussella valueofsignalinganorthopaedicsurgeryprogramasurveytoorthopaedicsurgeryprograms
AT fornfeistdouglass valueofsignalinganorthopaedicsurgeryprogramasurveytoorthopaedicsurgeryprograms