Cargando…
Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers
BACKGROUND: A trigger finger is recognized as the most common hand tendinopathies that reduce functional ability. The present study compares the clinical outcomes of open classic release surgery with ultrasound-guided percutaneous surgery in cases of multiple finger involvement. MATERIALS AND METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37288036 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_392_21 |
_version_ | 1785054030861434880 |
---|---|
author | Yavari, Masoud Modaresi, Seyed Masoud Hassanpour, Seyed Esmail Moosavizadeh, Seyed Mehdi Tabrizi, Ali |
author_facet | Yavari, Masoud Modaresi, Seyed Masoud Hassanpour, Seyed Esmail Moosavizadeh, Seyed Mehdi Tabrizi, Ali |
author_sort | Yavari, Masoud |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A trigger finger is recognized as the most common hand tendinopathies that reduce functional ability. The present study compares the clinical outcomes of open classic release surgery with ultrasound-guided percutaneous surgery in cases of multiple finger involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort study has been performed from March 2019 to December 2020 by participating 34 trigger finger patients with multiple involvements. These patients were treated using classical open release and ultrasound-guided percutaneous release methods and both methods were compared in patients. The pain severity and functional ability obtained from the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (Quick-DASH) test scores were compared. RESULTS: The pain intensity in the classical open surgery patients was not significantly different from the ultrasound-guided group, and a one-month follow-up showed that the pain intensity in the ultrasound-guided patients was significantly less than in the other group (P = 0.02). Besides, no significant difference was observed between the functional abilities before and after the one-month follow-up. Indeed, the two groups had the same situations. Also, the recovery time in the ultrasound-guided percutaneous release group was significantly faster than in the other group. These cases had statistical differences as P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively. The surgical release was 100% successful in both groups. The patients’ satisfaction rates in the ultrasound-guided and open classic surgery treatment methods were 94.1 and 76.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Classical open release and ultrasound-guided percutaneous surgery could successfully treat multiple trigger fingers. However, ultrasound-guided percutaneous surgery provided faster recovery and less pain intensity than the other method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10241637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102416372023-06-07 Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers Yavari, Masoud Modaresi, Seyed Masoud Hassanpour, Seyed Esmail Moosavizadeh, Seyed Mehdi Tabrizi, Ali Adv Biomed Res Original Article BACKGROUND: A trigger finger is recognized as the most common hand tendinopathies that reduce functional ability. The present study compares the clinical outcomes of open classic release surgery with ultrasound-guided percutaneous surgery in cases of multiple finger involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort study has been performed from March 2019 to December 2020 by participating 34 trigger finger patients with multiple involvements. These patients were treated using classical open release and ultrasound-guided percutaneous release methods and both methods were compared in patients. The pain severity and functional ability obtained from the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (Quick-DASH) test scores were compared. RESULTS: The pain intensity in the classical open surgery patients was not significantly different from the ultrasound-guided group, and a one-month follow-up showed that the pain intensity in the ultrasound-guided patients was significantly less than in the other group (P = 0.02). Besides, no significant difference was observed between the functional abilities before and after the one-month follow-up. Indeed, the two groups had the same situations. Also, the recovery time in the ultrasound-guided percutaneous release group was significantly faster than in the other group. These cases had statistical differences as P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively. The surgical release was 100% successful in both groups. The patients’ satisfaction rates in the ultrasound-guided and open classic surgery treatment methods were 94.1 and 76.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Classical open release and ultrasound-guided percutaneous surgery could successfully treat multiple trigger fingers. However, ultrasound-guided percutaneous surgery provided faster recovery and less pain intensity than the other method. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10241637/ /pubmed/37288036 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_392_21 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Advanced Biomedical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yavari, Masoud Modaresi, Seyed Masoud Hassanpour, Seyed Esmail Moosavizadeh, Seyed Mehdi Tabrizi, Ali Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers |
title | Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers |
title_full | Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers |
title_fullStr | Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers |
title_short | Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers |
title_sort | clinical study between percutaneous ultrasound-guided release and open classic surgery in treating multiple trigger fingers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37288036 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_392_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yavarimasoud clinicalstudybetweenpercutaneousultrasoundguidedreleaseandopenclassicsurgeryintreatingmultipletriggerfingers AT modaresiseyedmasoud clinicalstudybetweenpercutaneousultrasoundguidedreleaseandopenclassicsurgeryintreatingmultipletriggerfingers AT hassanpourseyedesmail clinicalstudybetweenpercutaneousultrasoundguidedreleaseandopenclassicsurgeryintreatingmultipletriggerfingers AT moosavizadehseyedmehdi clinicalstudybetweenpercutaneousultrasoundguidedreleaseandopenclassicsurgeryintreatingmultipletriggerfingers AT tabriziali clinicalstudybetweenpercutaneousultrasoundguidedreleaseandopenclassicsurgeryintreatingmultipletriggerfingers |