Cargando…

Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers

BACKGROUND: A trigger finger is recognized as the most common hand tendinopathies that reduce functional ability. The present study compares the clinical outcomes of open classic release surgery with ultrasound-guided percutaneous surgery in cases of multiple finger involvement. MATERIALS AND METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yavari, Masoud, Modaresi, Seyed Masoud, Hassanpour, Seyed Esmail, Moosavizadeh, Seyed Mehdi, Tabrizi, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37288036
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_392_21
_version_ 1785054030861434880
author Yavari, Masoud
Modaresi, Seyed Masoud
Hassanpour, Seyed Esmail
Moosavizadeh, Seyed Mehdi
Tabrizi, Ali
author_facet Yavari, Masoud
Modaresi, Seyed Masoud
Hassanpour, Seyed Esmail
Moosavizadeh, Seyed Mehdi
Tabrizi, Ali
author_sort Yavari, Masoud
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A trigger finger is recognized as the most common hand tendinopathies that reduce functional ability. The present study compares the clinical outcomes of open classic release surgery with ultrasound-guided percutaneous surgery in cases of multiple finger involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort study has been performed from March 2019 to December 2020 by participating 34 trigger finger patients with multiple involvements. These patients were treated using classical open release and ultrasound-guided percutaneous release methods and both methods were compared in patients. The pain severity and functional ability obtained from the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (Quick-DASH) test scores were compared. RESULTS: The pain intensity in the classical open surgery patients was not significantly different from the ultrasound-guided group, and a one-month follow-up showed that the pain intensity in the ultrasound-guided patients was significantly less than in the other group (P = 0.02). Besides, no significant difference was observed between the functional abilities before and after the one-month follow-up. Indeed, the two groups had the same situations. Also, the recovery time in the ultrasound-guided percutaneous release group was significantly faster than in the other group. These cases had statistical differences as P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively. The surgical release was 100% successful in both groups. The patients’ satisfaction rates in the ultrasound-guided and open classic surgery treatment methods were 94.1 and 76.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Classical open release and ultrasound-guided percutaneous surgery could successfully treat multiple trigger fingers. However, ultrasound-guided percutaneous surgery provided faster recovery and less pain intensity than the other method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10241637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102416372023-06-07 Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers Yavari, Masoud Modaresi, Seyed Masoud Hassanpour, Seyed Esmail Moosavizadeh, Seyed Mehdi Tabrizi, Ali Adv Biomed Res Original Article BACKGROUND: A trigger finger is recognized as the most common hand tendinopathies that reduce functional ability. The present study compares the clinical outcomes of open classic release surgery with ultrasound-guided percutaneous surgery in cases of multiple finger involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort study has been performed from March 2019 to December 2020 by participating 34 trigger finger patients with multiple involvements. These patients were treated using classical open release and ultrasound-guided percutaneous release methods and both methods were compared in patients. The pain severity and functional ability obtained from the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (Quick-DASH) test scores were compared. RESULTS: The pain intensity in the classical open surgery patients was not significantly different from the ultrasound-guided group, and a one-month follow-up showed that the pain intensity in the ultrasound-guided patients was significantly less than in the other group (P = 0.02). Besides, no significant difference was observed between the functional abilities before and after the one-month follow-up. Indeed, the two groups had the same situations. Also, the recovery time in the ultrasound-guided percutaneous release group was significantly faster than in the other group. These cases had statistical differences as P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively. The surgical release was 100% successful in both groups. The patients’ satisfaction rates in the ultrasound-guided and open classic surgery treatment methods were 94.1 and 76.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Classical open release and ultrasound-guided percutaneous surgery could successfully treat multiple trigger fingers. However, ultrasound-guided percutaneous surgery provided faster recovery and less pain intensity than the other method. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10241637/ /pubmed/37288036 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_392_21 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Advanced Biomedical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yavari, Masoud
Modaresi, Seyed Masoud
Hassanpour, Seyed Esmail
Moosavizadeh, Seyed Mehdi
Tabrizi, Ali
Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers
title Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers
title_full Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers
title_fullStr Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers
title_short Clinical Study Between Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Release and Open Classic Surgery in Treating Multiple Trigger Fingers
title_sort clinical study between percutaneous ultrasound-guided release and open classic surgery in treating multiple trigger fingers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37288036
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_392_21
work_keys_str_mv AT yavarimasoud clinicalstudybetweenpercutaneousultrasoundguidedreleaseandopenclassicsurgeryintreatingmultipletriggerfingers
AT modaresiseyedmasoud clinicalstudybetweenpercutaneousultrasoundguidedreleaseandopenclassicsurgeryintreatingmultipletriggerfingers
AT hassanpourseyedesmail clinicalstudybetweenpercutaneousultrasoundguidedreleaseandopenclassicsurgeryintreatingmultipletriggerfingers
AT moosavizadehseyedmehdi clinicalstudybetweenpercutaneousultrasoundguidedreleaseandopenclassicsurgeryintreatingmultipletriggerfingers
AT tabriziali clinicalstudybetweenpercutaneousultrasoundguidedreleaseandopenclassicsurgeryintreatingmultipletriggerfingers