Cargando…

Examining the psychometric properties of a split version of the EQ-5D-5L anxiety/depression dimension in patients with anxiety and/or depression

PURPOSE: This study explored differences in self-reported responses and the psychometric performance of the composite EQ-5D-5L anxiety/depression (A/D) dimension compared with a split version of the dimension where ‘anxiety’ and ‘depression’ are measured separately. METHODS: People with anxiety and/...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belay, Yared Belete, Mihalopoulos, Cathrine, Lee, Yong Yi, Mulhern, Brendan, Engel, Lidia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36809437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03372-7
_version_ 1785054040831295488
author Belay, Yared Belete
Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
Lee, Yong Yi
Mulhern, Brendan
Engel, Lidia
author_facet Belay, Yared Belete
Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
Lee, Yong Yi
Mulhern, Brendan
Engel, Lidia
author_sort Belay, Yared Belete
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study explored differences in self-reported responses and the psychometric performance of the composite EQ-5D-5L anxiety/depression (A/D) dimension compared with a split version of the dimension where ‘anxiety’ and ‘depression’ are measured separately. METHODS: People with anxiety and/or depression who visited the Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia completed the standard EQ-5D-5L with the added subdimensions. Correlation analysis was used to examine convergent validity with validated measures of depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7), while ANOVA was used to assess known-groups’ validity. Agreement between ratings for composite and split dimensions was compared using percent agreement and Cohen’s Kappa, while the proportion of ‘no problems’ reports was compared using the chi-square test. Discriminatory power analysis was undertaken using the Shannon index (H’) and Shannon Evenness index (J’). Open-ended questions explored participants' preferences. RESULTS: Of the 462 respondents, 30.5% reported no problems with the composite A/D, while 13.2% reported no problems on both subdimensions. Agreement between ratings for composite and split dimensions was highest for respondents with comorbid anxiety and depression. The depression subdimension had higher correlation with PHQ-9 (r = 0.53) and GAD-7 (r = 0.33) than the composite A/D dimension (r = 0.36 and r = 0.28, respectively). The split subdimensions and composite A/D could adequately differentiate respondents based on their severity of anxiety or depression. Slightly better informativity was observed in EQ-4D-5L + anxiety (H’ = 5.4; J’ = 0.47) and EQ-4D-5L + depression (H’ = 5.31; J’ = 0.46) than EQ-5D-5L (H’ = 5.19; J’ = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Adopting two subdimensions within the EQ-5D-5L tool appears to perform slightly better than the standard EQ-5D-5L. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-023-03372-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10241678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102416782023-06-07 Examining the psychometric properties of a split version of the EQ-5D-5L anxiety/depression dimension in patients with anxiety and/or depression Belay, Yared Belete Mihalopoulos, Cathrine Lee, Yong Yi Mulhern, Brendan Engel, Lidia Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: This study explored differences in self-reported responses and the psychometric performance of the composite EQ-5D-5L anxiety/depression (A/D) dimension compared with a split version of the dimension where ‘anxiety’ and ‘depression’ are measured separately. METHODS: People with anxiety and/or depression who visited the Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia completed the standard EQ-5D-5L with the added subdimensions. Correlation analysis was used to examine convergent validity with validated measures of depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7), while ANOVA was used to assess known-groups’ validity. Agreement between ratings for composite and split dimensions was compared using percent agreement and Cohen’s Kappa, while the proportion of ‘no problems’ reports was compared using the chi-square test. Discriminatory power analysis was undertaken using the Shannon index (H’) and Shannon Evenness index (J’). Open-ended questions explored participants' preferences. RESULTS: Of the 462 respondents, 30.5% reported no problems with the composite A/D, while 13.2% reported no problems on both subdimensions. Agreement between ratings for composite and split dimensions was highest for respondents with comorbid anxiety and depression. The depression subdimension had higher correlation with PHQ-9 (r = 0.53) and GAD-7 (r = 0.33) than the composite A/D dimension (r = 0.36 and r = 0.28, respectively). The split subdimensions and composite A/D could adequately differentiate respondents based on their severity of anxiety or depression. Slightly better informativity was observed in EQ-4D-5L + anxiety (H’ = 5.4; J’ = 0.47) and EQ-4D-5L + depression (H’ = 5.31; J’ = 0.46) than EQ-5D-5L (H’ = 5.19; J’ = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Adopting two subdimensions within the EQ-5D-5L tool appears to perform slightly better than the standard EQ-5D-5L. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-023-03372-7. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10241678/ /pubmed/36809437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03372-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Belay, Yared Belete
Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
Lee, Yong Yi
Mulhern, Brendan
Engel, Lidia
Examining the psychometric properties of a split version of the EQ-5D-5L anxiety/depression dimension in patients with anxiety and/or depression
title Examining the psychometric properties of a split version of the EQ-5D-5L anxiety/depression dimension in patients with anxiety and/or depression
title_full Examining the psychometric properties of a split version of the EQ-5D-5L anxiety/depression dimension in patients with anxiety and/or depression
title_fullStr Examining the psychometric properties of a split version of the EQ-5D-5L anxiety/depression dimension in patients with anxiety and/or depression
title_full_unstemmed Examining the psychometric properties of a split version of the EQ-5D-5L anxiety/depression dimension in patients with anxiety and/or depression
title_short Examining the psychometric properties of a split version of the EQ-5D-5L anxiety/depression dimension in patients with anxiety and/or depression
title_sort examining the psychometric properties of a split version of the eq-5d-5l anxiety/depression dimension in patients with anxiety and/or depression
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36809437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03372-7
work_keys_str_mv AT belayyaredbelete examiningthepsychometricpropertiesofasplitversionoftheeq5d5lanxietydepressiondimensioninpatientswithanxietyandordepression
AT mihalopouloscathrine examiningthepsychometricpropertiesofasplitversionoftheeq5d5lanxietydepressiondimensioninpatientswithanxietyandordepression
AT leeyongyi examiningthepsychometricpropertiesofasplitversionoftheeq5d5lanxietydepressiondimensioninpatientswithanxietyandordepression
AT mulhernbrendan examiningthepsychometricpropertiesofasplitversionoftheeq5d5lanxietydepressiondimensioninpatientswithanxietyandordepression
AT engellidia examiningthepsychometricpropertiesofasplitversionoftheeq5d5lanxietydepressiondimensioninpatientswithanxietyandordepression