Cargando…
Multiple visual objects are represented differently in the human brain and convolutional neural networks
Objects in the real world usually appear with other objects. To form object representations independent of whether or not other objects are encoded concurrently, in the primate brain, responses to an object pair are well approximated by the average responses to each constituent object shown alone. T...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36029-z |
_version_ | 1785054065549377536 |
---|---|
author | Mocz, Viola Jeong, Su Keun Chun, Marvin Xu, Yaoda |
author_facet | Mocz, Viola Jeong, Su Keun Chun, Marvin Xu, Yaoda |
author_sort | Mocz, Viola |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objects in the real world usually appear with other objects. To form object representations independent of whether or not other objects are encoded concurrently, in the primate brain, responses to an object pair are well approximated by the average responses to each constituent object shown alone. This is found at the single unit level in the slope of response amplitudes of macaque IT neurons to paired and single objects, and at the population level in fMRI voxel response patterns in human ventral object processing regions (e.g., LO). Here, we compare how the human brain and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) represent paired objects. In human LO, we show that averaging exists in both single fMRI voxels and voxel population responses. However, in the higher layers of five CNNs pretrained for object classification varying in architecture, depth and recurrent processing, slope distribution across units and, consequently, averaging at the population level both deviated significantly from the brain data. Object representations thus interact with each other in CNNs when objects are shown together and differ from when objects are shown individually. Such distortions could significantly limit CNNs’ ability to generalize object representations formed in different contexts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10241785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102417852023-06-07 Multiple visual objects are represented differently in the human brain and convolutional neural networks Mocz, Viola Jeong, Su Keun Chun, Marvin Xu, Yaoda Sci Rep Article Objects in the real world usually appear with other objects. To form object representations independent of whether or not other objects are encoded concurrently, in the primate brain, responses to an object pair are well approximated by the average responses to each constituent object shown alone. This is found at the single unit level in the slope of response amplitudes of macaque IT neurons to paired and single objects, and at the population level in fMRI voxel response patterns in human ventral object processing regions (e.g., LO). Here, we compare how the human brain and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) represent paired objects. In human LO, we show that averaging exists in both single fMRI voxels and voxel population responses. However, in the higher layers of five CNNs pretrained for object classification varying in architecture, depth and recurrent processing, slope distribution across units and, consequently, averaging at the population level both deviated significantly from the brain data. Object representations thus interact with each other in CNNs when objects are shown together and differ from when objects are shown individually. Such distortions could significantly limit CNNs’ ability to generalize object representations formed in different contexts. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10241785/ /pubmed/37277406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36029-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Mocz, Viola Jeong, Su Keun Chun, Marvin Xu, Yaoda Multiple visual objects are represented differently in the human brain and convolutional neural networks |
title | Multiple visual objects are represented differently in the human brain and convolutional neural networks |
title_full | Multiple visual objects are represented differently in the human brain and convolutional neural networks |
title_fullStr | Multiple visual objects are represented differently in the human brain and convolutional neural networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Multiple visual objects are represented differently in the human brain and convolutional neural networks |
title_short | Multiple visual objects are represented differently in the human brain and convolutional neural networks |
title_sort | multiple visual objects are represented differently in the human brain and convolutional neural networks |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36029-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moczviola multiplevisualobjectsarerepresenteddifferentlyinthehumanbrainandconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT jeongsukeun multiplevisualobjectsarerepresenteddifferentlyinthehumanbrainandconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT chunmarvin multiplevisualobjectsarerepresenteddifferentlyinthehumanbrainandconvolutionalneuralnetworks AT xuyaoda multiplevisualobjectsarerepresenteddifferentlyinthehumanbrainandconvolutionalneuralnetworks |