Cargando…

The real bacterial filtration efficiency to evaluate the effective protection of facemasks used for the prevention of respiratory diseases

The real protection offered by facemasks to control the transmission of respiratory viruses is still undetermined. Most of the manufacturing regulations, as well as scientific studies, have focused on studying the filtration capacity of the fabrics from which they are made, ignoring the air that esc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benito, Pedro J., Gutiérrez, Álvaro, Rojo-Tirado, Miguel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35071-1
_version_ 1785054097905287168
author Benito, Pedro J.
Gutiérrez, Álvaro
Rojo-Tirado, Miguel A.
author_facet Benito, Pedro J.
Gutiérrez, Álvaro
Rojo-Tirado, Miguel A.
author_sort Benito, Pedro J.
collection PubMed
description The real protection offered by facemasks to control the transmission of respiratory viruses is still undetermined. Most of the manufacturing regulations, as well as scientific studies, have focused on studying the filtration capacity of the fabrics from which they are made, ignoring the air that escapes through the facial misalignments, and which depends on the respiratory frequencies and volumes. The objective of this work was to define a Real Bacterial Filtration Efficiency for each type of facemask, considering the bacterial filtration efficiency of the manufacturers and the air that passes through them. Nine different facemasks were tested on a mannequin with three gas analyzers (measuring inlet, outlet, and leak volumes) inside a polymethylmethacrylate box. In addition, the differential pressure was measured to determine the resistance offered by the facemasks during the inhalation and exhalation processes. Air was introduced with a manual syringe for 180 s simulating inhalations and exhalations at rest, light, moderate and vigorous activities (10, 60, 80 and 120 L/min, respectively). Statistical analysis showed that practically half of the air entering to the system is not filtered by the facemasks in all intensities (p < 0.001, ηp(2) = 0.971). They also showed that the hygienic facemasks filter more than 70% of the air, and their filtration does not depend on the simulated intensity, while the rest of the facemasks show an evidently different response, influenced by the amount of air mobilized. Therefore, the Real Bacterial Filtration Efficiency can be calculated as a modulation of the Bacterial Filtration Efficiencies that depends on the type of facemask. The real filtration capacity of the facemasks has been overestimated during last years since the filtration of the fabrics is not the real filtration when the facemask is worn.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10241918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102419182023-06-07 The real bacterial filtration efficiency to evaluate the effective protection of facemasks used for the prevention of respiratory diseases Benito, Pedro J. Gutiérrez, Álvaro Rojo-Tirado, Miguel A. Sci Rep Article The real protection offered by facemasks to control the transmission of respiratory viruses is still undetermined. Most of the manufacturing regulations, as well as scientific studies, have focused on studying the filtration capacity of the fabrics from which they are made, ignoring the air that escapes through the facial misalignments, and which depends on the respiratory frequencies and volumes. The objective of this work was to define a Real Bacterial Filtration Efficiency for each type of facemask, considering the bacterial filtration efficiency of the manufacturers and the air that passes through them. Nine different facemasks were tested on a mannequin with three gas analyzers (measuring inlet, outlet, and leak volumes) inside a polymethylmethacrylate box. In addition, the differential pressure was measured to determine the resistance offered by the facemasks during the inhalation and exhalation processes. Air was introduced with a manual syringe for 180 s simulating inhalations and exhalations at rest, light, moderate and vigorous activities (10, 60, 80 and 120 L/min, respectively). Statistical analysis showed that practically half of the air entering to the system is not filtered by the facemasks in all intensities (p < 0.001, ηp(2) = 0.971). They also showed that the hygienic facemasks filter more than 70% of the air, and their filtration does not depend on the simulated intensity, while the rest of the facemasks show an evidently different response, influenced by the amount of air mobilized. Therefore, the Real Bacterial Filtration Efficiency can be calculated as a modulation of the Bacterial Filtration Efficiencies that depends on the type of facemask. The real filtration capacity of the facemasks has been overestimated during last years since the filtration of the fabrics is not the real filtration when the facemask is worn. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10241918/ /pubmed/37277420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35071-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Benito, Pedro J.
Gutiérrez, Álvaro
Rojo-Tirado, Miguel A.
The real bacterial filtration efficiency to evaluate the effective protection of facemasks used for the prevention of respiratory diseases
title The real bacterial filtration efficiency to evaluate the effective protection of facemasks used for the prevention of respiratory diseases
title_full The real bacterial filtration efficiency to evaluate the effective protection of facemasks used for the prevention of respiratory diseases
title_fullStr The real bacterial filtration efficiency to evaluate the effective protection of facemasks used for the prevention of respiratory diseases
title_full_unstemmed The real bacterial filtration efficiency to evaluate the effective protection of facemasks used for the prevention of respiratory diseases
title_short The real bacterial filtration efficiency to evaluate the effective protection of facemasks used for the prevention of respiratory diseases
title_sort real bacterial filtration efficiency to evaluate the effective protection of facemasks used for the prevention of respiratory diseases
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35071-1
work_keys_str_mv AT benitopedroj therealbacterialfiltrationefficiencytoevaluatetheeffectiveprotectionoffacemasksusedforthepreventionofrespiratorydiseases
AT gutierrezalvaro therealbacterialfiltrationefficiencytoevaluatetheeffectiveprotectionoffacemasksusedforthepreventionofrespiratorydiseases
AT rojotiradomiguela therealbacterialfiltrationefficiencytoevaluatetheeffectiveprotectionoffacemasksusedforthepreventionofrespiratorydiseases
AT benitopedroj realbacterialfiltrationefficiencytoevaluatetheeffectiveprotectionoffacemasksusedforthepreventionofrespiratorydiseases
AT gutierrezalvaro realbacterialfiltrationefficiencytoevaluatetheeffectiveprotectionoffacemasksusedforthepreventionofrespiratorydiseases
AT rojotiradomiguela realbacterialfiltrationefficiencytoevaluatetheeffectiveprotectionoffacemasksusedforthepreventionofrespiratorydiseases