Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of licensed dose intranasal corticosteroids for moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

No evidence shows that one intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) is better than another for treating moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis (AR). This network meta-analysis assessed the comparative efficacy and acceptability of licensed dose aqueous INCSs. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soe, Kay Khine, Krikeerati, Thanachit, Pheerapanyawaranun, Chatkamol, Niyomnaitham, Suvimol, Phinyo, Phichayut, Thongngarm, Torpong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37288109
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1184552
_version_ 1785054124858933248
author Soe, Kay Khine
Krikeerati, Thanachit
Pheerapanyawaranun, Chatkamol
Niyomnaitham, Suvimol
Phinyo, Phichayut
Thongngarm, Torpong
author_facet Soe, Kay Khine
Krikeerati, Thanachit
Pheerapanyawaranun, Chatkamol
Niyomnaitham, Suvimol
Phinyo, Phichayut
Thongngarm, Torpong
author_sort Soe, Kay Khine
collection PubMed
description No evidence shows that one intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) is better than another for treating moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis (AR). This network meta-analysis assessed the comparative efficacy and acceptability of licensed dose aqueous INCSs. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until 31 March 2022. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing INCSs with placebo or other types of INCSs in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data following the Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guideline. A random-effects model was used for data pooling. Continuous outcomes were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD). The primary outcomes were the efficacy in improving total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and treatment acceptability (the study dropout). We included 26 studies, 13 with 5,134 seasonal AR patients and 13 with 4,393 perennial AR patients. Most placebo-controlled studies had a moderate quality of evidence. In seasonal AR, mometasone furoate (MF) was ranked the highest efficacy, followed by fluticasone furoate (FF), ciclesonide (CIC), fluticasone propionate and triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) (SMD −0.47, 95% CI: −0.63 to −0.31; −0.46, 95% CI: −0.59 to −0.33; −0.44, 95% CI: −0.75 to −0.13; −0.42, 95% CI: −0.67 to −0.17 and −0.41, 95% CI: −0.81 to −0.00), In perennial AR, budesonide was ranked the highest efficacy, followed by FF, TAA, CIC, and MF (SMD −0.43, 95% CI: −0.75 to −0.11; −0.36, 95% CI: −0.53 to −0.19; −0.32, 95% CI: −0.54 to −0.10; −0.29, 95% CI: −0.48 to −0.11; and −0.28, 95% CI: −0.55 to −0.01). The acceptability of all included INCSs was not inferior to the placebo. According to our indirect comparison, some INCSs have superior efficacy to others with moderate quality of evidence in most placebo-controlled studies for treating moderate-to-severe AR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10242043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102420432023-06-07 Comparative efficacy and acceptability of licensed dose intranasal corticosteroids for moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Soe, Kay Khine Krikeerati, Thanachit Pheerapanyawaranun, Chatkamol Niyomnaitham, Suvimol Phinyo, Phichayut Thongngarm, Torpong Front Pharmacol Pharmacology No evidence shows that one intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) is better than another for treating moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis (AR). This network meta-analysis assessed the comparative efficacy and acceptability of licensed dose aqueous INCSs. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until 31 March 2022. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing INCSs with placebo or other types of INCSs in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data following the Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guideline. A random-effects model was used for data pooling. Continuous outcomes were expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD). The primary outcomes were the efficacy in improving total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and treatment acceptability (the study dropout). We included 26 studies, 13 with 5,134 seasonal AR patients and 13 with 4,393 perennial AR patients. Most placebo-controlled studies had a moderate quality of evidence. In seasonal AR, mometasone furoate (MF) was ranked the highest efficacy, followed by fluticasone furoate (FF), ciclesonide (CIC), fluticasone propionate and triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) (SMD −0.47, 95% CI: −0.63 to −0.31; −0.46, 95% CI: −0.59 to −0.33; −0.44, 95% CI: −0.75 to −0.13; −0.42, 95% CI: −0.67 to −0.17 and −0.41, 95% CI: −0.81 to −0.00), In perennial AR, budesonide was ranked the highest efficacy, followed by FF, TAA, CIC, and MF (SMD −0.43, 95% CI: −0.75 to −0.11; −0.36, 95% CI: −0.53 to −0.19; −0.32, 95% CI: −0.54 to −0.10; −0.29, 95% CI: −0.48 to −0.11; and −0.28, 95% CI: −0.55 to −0.01). The acceptability of all included INCSs was not inferior to the placebo. According to our indirect comparison, some INCSs have superior efficacy to others with moderate quality of evidence in most placebo-controlled studies for treating moderate-to-severe AR. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10242043/ /pubmed/37288109 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1184552 Text en Copyright © 2023 Soe, Krikeerati, Pheerapanyawaranun, Niyomnaitham, Phinyo and Thongngarm. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Soe, Kay Khine
Krikeerati, Thanachit
Pheerapanyawaranun, Chatkamol
Niyomnaitham, Suvimol
Phinyo, Phichayut
Thongngarm, Torpong
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of licensed dose intranasal corticosteroids for moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Comparative efficacy and acceptability of licensed dose intranasal corticosteroids for moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy and acceptability of licensed dose intranasal corticosteroids for moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and acceptability of licensed dose intranasal corticosteroids for moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and acceptability of licensed dose intranasal corticosteroids for moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy and acceptability of licensed dose intranasal corticosteroids for moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy and acceptability of licensed dose intranasal corticosteroids for moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37288109
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1184552
work_keys_str_mv AT soekaykhine comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityoflicenseddoseintranasalcorticosteroidsformoderatetosevereallergicrhinitisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT krikeeratithanachit comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityoflicenseddoseintranasalcorticosteroidsformoderatetosevereallergicrhinitisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT pheerapanyawaranunchatkamol comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityoflicenseddoseintranasalcorticosteroidsformoderatetosevereallergicrhinitisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT niyomnaithamsuvimol comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityoflicenseddoseintranasalcorticosteroidsformoderatetosevereallergicrhinitisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT phinyophichayut comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityoflicenseddoseintranasalcorticosteroidsformoderatetosevereallergicrhinitisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT thongngarmtorpong comparativeefficacyandacceptabilityoflicenseddoseintranasalcorticosteroidsformoderatetosevereallergicrhinitisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis