Cargando…

Cochlear implant electrode impedance subcomponents as biomarker for residual hearing

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Maintaining the structural integrity of the cochlea and preserving residual hearing is crucial for patients, especially for those for whom electric acoustic stimulation is intended. Impedances could reflect trauma due to electrode array insertion and therefore could serv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schraivogel, Stephan, Aebischer, Philipp, Weder, Stefan, Caversaccio, Marco, Wimmer, Wilhelm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37288065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1183116
_version_ 1785054129905729536
author Schraivogel, Stephan
Aebischer, Philipp
Weder, Stefan
Caversaccio, Marco
Wimmer, Wilhelm
author_facet Schraivogel, Stephan
Aebischer, Philipp
Weder, Stefan
Caversaccio, Marco
Wimmer, Wilhelm
author_sort Schraivogel, Stephan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Maintaining the structural integrity of the cochlea and preserving residual hearing is crucial for patients, especially for those for whom electric acoustic stimulation is intended. Impedances could reflect trauma due to electrode array insertion and therefore could serve as a biomarker for residual hearing. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between residual hearing and estimated impedance subcomponents in a known collective from an exploratory study. METHODS: A total of 42 patients with lateral wall electrode arrays from the same manufacturer were included in the study. For each patient, we used data from audiological measurements to compute residual hearing, impedance telemetry recordings to estimate near and far-field impedances using an approximation model, and computed tomography scans to extract anatomical information about the cochlea. We assessed the association between residual hearing and impedance subcomponent data using linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: The progression of impedance subcomponents showed that far-field impedance was stable over time compared to near-field impedance. Low-frequency residual hearing demonstrated the progressive nature of hearing loss, with 48% of patients showing full or partial hearing preservation after 6 months of follow-up. Analysis revealed a statistically significant negative effect of near-field impedance on residual hearing (−3.81 dB HL per kΩ; p < 0.001). No significant effect of far-field impedance was found. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that near-field impedance offers higher specificity for residual hearing monitoring, while far-field impedance was not significantly associated with residual hearing. These results highlight the potential of impedance subcomponents as objective biomarkers for outcome monitoring in cochlear implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10242064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102420642023-06-07 Cochlear implant electrode impedance subcomponents as biomarker for residual hearing Schraivogel, Stephan Aebischer, Philipp Weder, Stefan Caversaccio, Marco Wimmer, Wilhelm Front Neurol Neurology INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Maintaining the structural integrity of the cochlea and preserving residual hearing is crucial for patients, especially for those for whom electric acoustic stimulation is intended. Impedances could reflect trauma due to electrode array insertion and therefore could serve as a biomarker for residual hearing. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between residual hearing and estimated impedance subcomponents in a known collective from an exploratory study. METHODS: A total of 42 patients with lateral wall electrode arrays from the same manufacturer were included in the study. For each patient, we used data from audiological measurements to compute residual hearing, impedance telemetry recordings to estimate near and far-field impedances using an approximation model, and computed tomography scans to extract anatomical information about the cochlea. We assessed the association between residual hearing and impedance subcomponent data using linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: The progression of impedance subcomponents showed that far-field impedance was stable over time compared to near-field impedance. Low-frequency residual hearing demonstrated the progressive nature of hearing loss, with 48% of patients showing full or partial hearing preservation after 6 months of follow-up. Analysis revealed a statistically significant negative effect of near-field impedance on residual hearing (−3.81 dB HL per kΩ; p < 0.001). No significant effect of far-field impedance was found. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that near-field impedance offers higher specificity for residual hearing monitoring, while far-field impedance was not significantly associated with residual hearing. These results highlight the potential of impedance subcomponents as objective biomarkers for outcome monitoring in cochlear implantation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10242064/ /pubmed/37288065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1183116 Text en Copyright © 2023 Schraivogel, Aebischer, Weder, Caversaccio and Wimmer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Schraivogel, Stephan
Aebischer, Philipp
Weder, Stefan
Caversaccio, Marco
Wimmer, Wilhelm
Cochlear implant electrode impedance subcomponents as biomarker for residual hearing
title Cochlear implant electrode impedance subcomponents as biomarker for residual hearing
title_full Cochlear implant electrode impedance subcomponents as biomarker for residual hearing
title_fullStr Cochlear implant electrode impedance subcomponents as biomarker for residual hearing
title_full_unstemmed Cochlear implant electrode impedance subcomponents as biomarker for residual hearing
title_short Cochlear implant electrode impedance subcomponents as biomarker for residual hearing
title_sort cochlear implant electrode impedance subcomponents as biomarker for residual hearing
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37288065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1183116
work_keys_str_mv AT schraivogelstephan cochlearimplantelectrodeimpedancesubcomponentsasbiomarkerforresidualhearing
AT aebischerphilipp cochlearimplantelectrodeimpedancesubcomponentsasbiomarkerforresidualhearing
AT wederstefan cochlearimplantelectrodeimpedancesubcomponentsasbiomarkerforresidualhearing
AT caversacciomarco cochlearimplantelectrodeimpedancesubcomponentsasbiomarkerforresidualhearing
AT wimmerwilhelm cochlearimplantelectrodeimpedancesubcomponentsasbiomarkerforresidualhearing