Cargando…
Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public
Genetic risk information for medically actionable conditions has relevance for patients’ blood relatives. However, cascade testing uptake in at-risk families is <50%, and the burden of contacting relatives is a significant barrier to dissemination of risk information. Health professionals (HPs) c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37280361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01395-9 |
_version_ | 1785054166917316608 |
---|---|
author | Tiller, Jane M. Stott, Ami Finlay, Keri Boughtwood, Tiffany Madelli, Evanthia O. Horton, Ari Winship, Ingrid Nowak, Kristen Otlowski, Margaret |
author_facet | Tiller, Jane M. Stott, Ami Finlay, Keri Boughtwood, Tiffany Madelli, Evanthia O. Horton, Ari Winship, Ingrid Nowak, Kristen Otlowski, Margaret |
author_sort | Tiller, Jane M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genetic risk information for medically actionable conditions has relevance for patients’ blood relatives. However, cascade testing uptake in at-risk families is <50%, and the burden of contacting relatives is a significant barrier to dissemination of risk information. Health professionals (HPs) could notify at-risk relatives directly, with patients’ consent. This practice is supported by international literature, including strong public support. However, there is little exploration of the Australian public’s views about this issue. We surveyed Australian adults using a consumer research company. Respondents were provided a hypothetical scenario and asked about views and preferences regarding direct contact by HPs. 1030 members of the public responded, with median age 45 y and 51% female. The majority would want to be told about genetic risk for conditions that can be prevented/treated early (85%) and contacted directly by a HP (68%). Most preferred a letter that included specific information about the genetic condition in the family (67%) and had no privacy concerns about HPs sending a letter using contact details provided by a relative (85%). A minority (< 5%) had significant privacy concerns, mostly about use of personal contact information. Concerns included ensuring information was not shared with third parties. Almost 50% would prefer that a family member contacted them before the letter was sent, while about half did not prefer this or were unsure. The Australian public supports (and prefers) direct notification of relatives at risk of medically actionable genetic conditions. Guidelines would assist with clarifying clinicians’ discretion in this area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10242214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102422142023-06-07 Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public Tiller, Jane M. Stott, Ami Finlay, Keri Boughtwood, Tiffany Madelli, Evanthia O. Horton, Ari Winship, Ingrid Nowak, Kristen Otlowski, Margaret Eur J Hum Genet Article Genetic risk information for medically actionable conditions has relevance for patients’ blood relatives. However, cascade testing uptake in at-risk families is <50%, and the burden of contacting relatives is a significant barrier to dissemination of risk information. Health professionals (HPs) could notify at-risk relatives directly, with patients’ consent. This practice is supported by international literature, including strong public support. However, there is little exploration of the Australian public’s views about this issue. We surveyed Australian adults using a consumer research company. Respondents were provided a hypothetical scenario and asked about views and preferences regarding direct contact by HPs. 1030 members of the public responded, with median age 45 y and 51% female. The majority would want to be told about genetic risk for conditions that can be prevented/treated early (85%) and contacted directly by a HP (68%). Most preferred a letter that included specific information about the genetic condition in the family (67%) and had no privacy concerns about HPs sending a letter using contact details provided by a relative (85%). A minority (< 5%) had significant privacy concerns, mostly about use of personal contact information. Concerns included ensuring information was not shared with third parties. Almost 50% would prefer that a family member contacted them before the letter was sent, while about half did not prefer this or were unsure. The Australian public supports (and prefers) direct notification of relatives at risk of medically actionable genetic conditions. Guidelines would assist with clarifying clinicians’ discretion in this area. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10242214/ /pubmed/37280361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01395-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Tiller, Jane M. Stott, Ami Finlay, Keri Boughtwood, Tiffany Madelli, Evanthia O. Horton, Ari Winship, Ingrid Nowak, Kristen Otlowski, Margaret Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public |
title | Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public |
title_full | Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public |
title_fullStr | Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public |
title_short | Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public |
title_sort | direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the australian public |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37280361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01395-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tillerjanem directnotificationbyhealthprofessionalsofrelativesatriskofgeneticconditionswithpatientconsentviewsoftheaustralianpublic AT stottami directnotificationbyhealthprofessionalsofrelativesatriskofgeneticconditionswithpatientconsentviewsoftheaustralianpublic AT finlaykeri directnotificationbyhealthprofessionalsofrelativesatriskofgeneticconditionswithpatientconsentviewsoftheaustralianpublic AT boughtwoodtiffany directnotificationbyhealthprofessionalsofrelativesatriskofgeneticconditionswithpatientconsentviewsoftheaustralianpublic AT madellievanthiao directnotificationbyhealthprofessionalsofrelativesatriskofgeneticconditionswithpatientconsentviewsoftheaustralianpublic AT hortonari directnotificationbyhealthprofessionalsofrelativesatriskofgeneticconditionswithpatientconsentviewsoftheaustralianpublic AT winshipingrid directnotificationbyhealthprofessionalsofrelativesatriskofgeneticconditionswithpatientconsentviewsoftheaustralianpublic AT nowakkristen directnotificationbyhealthprofessionalsofrelativesatriskofgeneticconditionswithpatientconsentviewsoftheaustralianpublic AT otlowskimargaret directnotificationbyhealthprofessionalsofrelativesatriskofgeneticconditionswithpatientconsentviewsoftheaustralianpublic |