Cargando…
Editorial: Minding the Gradient — Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacements for Surgical Bioprosthetic Valve Failure
Autores principales: | Zaid, Syed, Kleiman, Neal S. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37288127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shj.2022.100113 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes in Redo-Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve
por: Hecht, Sébastien, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Report on outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation and redo surgical aortic valve replacement in the Netherlands
por: van Steenbergen, G. J., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Transcatheter Double Valve-in-Valve Replacement of Aortic and Mitral Bioprosthetic Valves
por: Savoj, Javad, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
A comparison of valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves
por: Choi, Charles H., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Valve‐in‐Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
por: Raschpichler, Matthias, et al.
Publicado: (2022)