Cargando…

NET-02: a randomised, non-comparative, phase II trial of nal-IRI/5-FU or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for patients with poorly-differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (PD-EP-NEC) is poor. A recognised first-line (1L) treatment for advanced disease is etoposide/platinum-based chemotherapy with no standard second-line (2L) treatment. METHODS: Patients with his...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McNamara, Mairéad G., Swain, Jayne, Craig, Zoe, Sharma, Rohini, Faluyi, Olusola, Wadsley, Jonathan, Morgan, Carys, Wall, Lucy R., Chau, Ian, Reed, Nick, Sarker, Debashis, Margetts, Jane, Krell, Daniel, Cave, Judith, Sothi, Sharmila, Anthoney, Alan, Bell, Christopher, Patel, Alkesh, Oughton, Jamie B., Cairns, David A., Mansoor, Wasat, Lamarca, Angela, Hubner, Richard A., Valle, Juan W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37287870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102015
_version_ 1785054257028792320
author McNamara, Mairéad G.
Swain, Jayne
Craig, Zoe
Sharma, Rohini
Faluyi, Olusola
Wadsley, Jonathan
Morgan, Carys
Wall, Lucy R.
Chau, Ian
Reed, Nick
Sarker, Debashis
Margetts, Jane
Krell, Daniel
Cave, Judith
Sothi, Sharmila
Anthoney, Alan
Bell, Christopher
Patel, Alkesh
Oughton, Jamie B.
Cairns, David A.
Mansoor, Wasat
Lamarca, Angela
Hubner, Richard A.
Valle, Juan W.
author_facet McNamara, Mairéad G.
Swain, Jayne
Craig, Zoe
Sharma, Rohini
Faluyi, Olusola
Wadsley, Jonathan
Morgan, Carys
Wall, Lucy R.
Chau, Ian
Reed, Nick
Sarker, Debashis
Margetts, Jane
Krell, Daniel
Cave, Judith
Sothi, Sharmila
Anthoney, Alan
Bell, Christopher
Patel, Alkesh
Oughton, Jamie B.
Cairns, David A.
Mansoor, Wasat
Lamarca, Angela
Hubner, Richard A.
Valle, Juan W.
author_sort McNamara, Mairéad G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognosis for patients with poorly-differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (PD-EP-NEC) is poor. A recognised first-line (1L) treatment for advanced disease is etoposide/platinum-based chemotherapy with no standard second-line (2L) treatment. METHODS: Patients with histologically-confirmed PD-EP-NEC (Ki-67 > 20%; Grade 3) received IV liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) (70 mg/m(2) free base)/5-FU (2400 mg/m(2))/folinic acid, Q14 days (ARM A), or IV docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)), Q21 days (ARM B), as 2L therapy. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (80% power to demonstrate one-sided 95% lower confidence interval excluded 15% (target level of efficacy: 30%)). Secondary endpoints: objective response rate (ORR), median PFS, overall survival (OS), toxicity and patient-reported quality-of-life (QoL) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03837977). FINDINGS: Of 58 patients (29 each arm); 57% male, 90% ECOG PS 0/1, 10% PS 2, 89.7% Ki-67 ≥ 55%, primary site: 70.7%-gastrointestinal, 18.9%-other, 10.3%-unknown, 91.4%/6.9%/1.7% were resistant/sensitive/intolerant to 1L platinum-based treatment, respectively. The primary end-point of 6-month PFS rate was met by ARM A: 29.6% (lower 95% Confidence-Limit (CL) 15.7), but not by ARM B: 13.8% (lower 95%CL:4.9). ORR, median PFS and OS were 11.1% (95%CI:2.4–29.2) and 10.3% (95%CI:2.2–27.4%); 3 months (95%CI:2–6) and 2 months (95%CI:2-2); and 6 months (95%CI:3–10) and 6 months (95%CI:3–9) in ARMS A and B, respectively. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 occurred in 51.7% and 55.2% (1 and 6 discontinuations due to toxicity in ARMS A and B), respectively. QoL was maintained in ARM A, but not ARM B. INTERPRETATION: nal-IRI/5-FU/folinic acid, but not docetaxel, met the primary endpoint, with manageable toxicity and maintained QoL, with no difference in OS. ORR and median PFS were similar in both arms. This study provides prospective efficacy, toxicity and QoL data in the 2L setting in a disease group of unmet need, and represents some of the strongest evidence available to recommend systemic treatment to these patients. FUNDING: 10.13039/501100011725Servier.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10242623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102426232023-06-07 NET-02: a randomised, non-comparative, phase II trial of nal-IRI/5-FU or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma McNamara, Mairéad G. Swain, Jayne Craig, Zoe Sharma, Rohini Faluyi, Olusola Wadsley, Jonathan Morgan, Carys Wall, Lucy R. Chau, Ian Reed, Nick Sarker, Debashis Margetts, Jane Krell, Daniel Cave, Judith Sothi, Sharmila Anthoney, Alan Bell, Christopher Patel, Alkesh Oughton, Jamie B. Cairns, David A. Mansoor, Wasat Lamarca, Angela Hubner, Richard A. Valle, Juan W. eClinicalMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: The prognosis for patients with poorly-differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (PD-EP-NEC) is poor. A recognised first-line (1L) treatment for advanced disease is etoposide/platinum-based chemotherapy with no standard second-line (2L) treatment. METHODS: Patients with histologically-confirmed PD-EP-NEC (Ki-67 > 20%; Grade 3) received IV liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) (70 mg/m(2) free base)/5-FU (2400 mg/m(2))/folinic acid, Q14 days (ARM A), or IV docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)), Q21 days (ARM B), as 2L therapy. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (80% power to demonstrate one-sided 95% lower confidence interval excluded 15% (target level of efficacy: 30%)). Secondary endpoints: objective response rate (ORR), median PFS, overall survival (OS), toxicity and patient-reported quality-of-life (QoL) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03837977). FINDINGS: Of 58 patients (29 each arm); 57% male, 90% ECOG PS 0/1, 10% PS 2, 89.7% Ki-67 ≥ 55%, primary site: 70.7%-gastrointestinal, 18.9%-other, 10.3%-unknown, 91.4%/6.9%/1.7% were resistant/sensitive/intolerant to 1L platinum-based treatment, respectively. The primary end-point of 6-month PFS rate was met by ARM A: 29.6% (lower 95% Confidence-Limit (CL) 15.7), but not by ARM B: 13.8% (lower 95%CL:4.9). ORR, median PFS and OS were 11.1% (95%CI:2.4–29.2) and 10.3% (95%CI:2.2–27.4%); 3 months (95%CI:2–6) and 2 months (95%CI:2-2); and 6 months (95%CI:3–10) and 6 months (95%CI:3–9) in ARMS A and B, respectively. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 occurred in 51.7% and 55.2% (1 and 6 discontinuations due to toxicity in ARMS A and B), respectively. QoL was maintained in ARM A, but not ARM B. INTERPRETATION: nal-IRI/5-FU/folinic acid, but not docetaxel, met the primary endpoint, with manageable toxicity and maintained QoL, with no difference in OS. ORR and median PFS were similar in both arms. This study provides prospective efficacy, toxicity and QoL data in the 2L setting in a disease group of unmet need, and represents some of the strongest evidence available to recommend systemic treatment to these patients. FUNDING: 10.13039/501100011725Servier. Elsevier 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10242623/ /pubmed/37287870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102015 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
McNamara, Mairéad G.
Swain, Jayne
Craig, Zoe
Sharma, Rohini
Faluyi, Olusola
Wadsley, Jonathan
Morgan, Carys
Wall, Lucy R.
Chau, Ian
Reed, Nick
Sarker, Debashis
Margetts, Jane
Krell, Daniel
Cave, Judith
Sothi, Sharmila
Anthoney, Alan
Bell, Christopher
Patel, Alkesh
Oughton, Jamie B.
Cairns, David A.
Mansoor, Wasat
Lamarca, Angela
Hubner, Richard A.
Valle, Juan W.
NET-02: a randomised, non-comparative, phase II trial of nal-IRI/5-FU or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma
title NET-02: a randomised, non-comparative, phase II trial of nal-IRI/5-FU or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma
title_full NET-02: a randomised, non-comparative, phase II trial of nal-IRI/5-FU or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma
title_fullStr NET-02: a randomised, non-comparative, phase II trial of nal-IRI/5-FU or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed NET-02: a randomised, non-comparative, phase II trial of nal-IRI/5-FU or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma
title_short NET-02: a randomised, non-comparative, phase II trial of nal-IRI/5-FU or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma
title_sort net-02: a randomised, non-comparative, phase ii trial of nal-iri/5-fu or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with progressive poorly differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37287870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102015
work_keys_str_mv AT mcnamaramaireadg net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT swainjayne net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT craigzoe net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT sharmarohini net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT faluyiolusola net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT wadsleyjonathan net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT morgancarys net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT walllucyr net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT chauian net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT reednick net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT sarkerdebashis net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT margettsjane net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT krelldaniel net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT cavejudith net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT sothisharmila net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT anthoneyalan net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT bellchristopher net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT patelalkesh net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT oughtonjamieb net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT cairnsdavida net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT mansoorwasat net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT lamarcaangela net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT hubnerricharda net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma
AT vallejuanw net02arandomisednoncomparativephaseiitrialofnaliri5fuordocetaxelassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithprogressivepoorlydifferentiatedextrapulmonaryneuroendocrinecarcinoma