Cargando…
Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research
BACKGROUND: Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in research is still a poorly understood and infrequently practiced concept, although the literature stresses clear benefits for quality of care and research as well as patient satisfaction and empowerment. AIM: The presently described...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37165922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1835 |
_version_ | 1785054266989215744 |
---|---|
author | Weiler‐Wichtl, Liesa Josephine Leiss, Ulrike Gojo, Johannes Kienesberger, Anita Hansl, Rita Hopfgartner, Maximilian Schneider, Carina |
author_facet | Weiler‐Wichtl, Liesa Josephine Leiss, Ulrike Gojo, Johannes Kienesberger, Anita Hansl, Rita Hopfgartner, Maximilian Schneider, Carina |
author_sort | Weiler‐Wichtl, Liesa Josephine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in research is still a poorly understood and infrequently practiced concept, although the literature stresses clear benefits for quality of care and research as well as patient satisfaction and empowerment. AIM: The presently described project aimed at using different PPIE methods to evaluate the current state of knowledge about and attitude toward PPIE in research among different stakeholders of pediatric oncology in Europe. Based on the findings a tailored training tool directed toward the different stakeholders will be designed. METHODS AND RESULTS: An interdisciplinary steering group developed a mixed‐method 3‐stage process to (1) investigate the current knowledge and attitudes about PPIE using a Europe‐wide cross‐sectional online survey directed toward health care professionals (n = 134) and the patient group (patients, survivors, family members, …) (n = 168). The results were analyzed quantitatively, focusing on group comparisons (t‐tests, X (2) tests). (2) In a live workshop with n = 36 participants (HCPs and patient group) dual moderation teams (HCPs and patient experts) guided the exploration of effective ways for practicing PPIE. Despite classifying PPIE as relevant, both HCPs and patients indicated a low level of knowledge about the concept and terminology (patients: t(334) = −2.82, p = .004; HCPs: t(270) = −2.88, p = .004). While HCPs assumed to already be involving patients in many research areas, this was not perceived by the patient group (X (2) (1, N = 304) = 42.70, p < .001). HCPs and patients named similar obstacles for implementing PPIE in research, though numerous creative solutions were found during the workshop (engagement). (3) The outcomes were integrated into a training tool (White‐Board movie). CONCLUSION: Although HCPs and patients acknowledge the benefit of PPIE, the presented results highlight the lack of awareness about the concept, and the need for effective tools for researchers to integrate PPIE throughout the entire research process, thereby contributing to a sustainable change within the scientific culture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10242658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102426582023-06-07 Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research Weiler‐Wichtl, Liesa Josephine Leiss, Ulrike Gojo, Johannes Kienesberger, Anita Hansl, Rita Hopfgartner, Maximilian Schneider, Carina Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in research is still a poorly understood and infrequently practiced concept, although the literature stresses clear benefits for quality of care and research as well as patient satisfaction and empowerment. AIM: The presently described project aimed at using different PPIE methods to evaluate the current state of knowledge about and attitude toward PPIE in research among different stakeholders of pediatric oncology in Europe. Based on the findings a tailored training tool directed toward the different stakeholders will be designed. METHODS AND RESULTS: An interdisciplinary steering group developed a mixed‐method 3‐stage process to (1) investigate the current knowledge and attitudes about PPIE using a Europe‐wide cross‐sectional online survey directed toward health care professionals (n = 134) and the patient group (patients, survivors, family members, …) (n = 168). The results were analyzed quantitatively, focusing on group comparisons (t‐tests, X (2) tests). (2) In a live workshop with n = 36 participants (HCPs and patient group) dual moderation teams (HCPs and patient experts) guided the exploration of effective ways for practicing PPIE. Despite classifying PPIE as relevant, both HCPs and patients indicated a low level of knowledge about the concept and terminology (patients: t(334) = −2.82, p = .004; HCPs: t(270) = −2.88, p = .004). While HCPs assumed to already be involving patients in many research areas, this was not perceived by the patient group (X (2) (1, N = 304) = 42.70, p < .001). HCPs and patients named similar obstacles for implementing PPIE in research, though numerous creative solutions were found during the workshop (engagement). (3) The outcomes were integrated into a training tool (White‐Board movie). CONCLUSION: Although HCPs and patients acknowledge the benefit of PPIE, the presented results highlight the lack of awareness about the concept, and the need for effective tools for researchers to integrate PPIE throughout the entire research process, thereby contributing to a sustainable change within the scientific culture. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10242658/ /pubmed/37165922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1835 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Weiler‐Wichtl, Liesa Josephine Leiss, Ulrike Gojo, Johannes Kienesberger, Anita Hansl, Rita Hopfgartner, Maximilian Schneider, Carina Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research |
title | Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research |
title_full | Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research |
title_fullStr | Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research |
title_full_unstemmed | Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research |
title_short | Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research |
title_sort | good to know – this is ppie! development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37165922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1835 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weilerwichtlliesajosephine goodtoknowthisisppiedevelopmentofatrainingtoolforpublicandpatientinvolvementandengagementinpediatriconcologicalresearch AT leissulrike goodtoknowthisisppiedevelopmentofatrainingtoolforpublicandpatientinvolvementandengagementinpediatriconcologicalresearch AT gojojohannes goodtoknowthisisppiedevelopmentofatrainingtoolforpublicandpatientinvolvementandengagementinpediatriconcologicalresearch AT kienesbergeranita goodtoknowthisisppiedevelopmentofatrainingtoolforpublicandpatientinvolvementandengagementinpediatriconcologicalresearch AT hanslrita goodtoknowthisisppiedevelopmentofatrainingtoolforpublicandpatientinvolvementandengagementinpediatriconcologicalresearch AT hopfgartnermaximilian goodtoknowthisisppiedevelopmentofatrainingtoolforpublicandpatientinvolvementandengagementinpediatriconcologicalresearch AT schneidercarina goodtoknowthisisppiedevelopmentofatrainingtoolforpublicandpatientinvolvementandengagementinpediatriconcologicalresearch |