Cargando…

Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research

BACKGROUND: Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in research is still a poorly understood and infrequently practiced concept, although the literature stresses clear benefits for quality of care and research as well as patient satisfaction and empowerment. AIM: The presently described...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weiler‐Wichtl, Liesa Josephine, Leiss, Ulrike, Gojo, Johannes, Kienesberger, Anita, Hansl, Rita, Hopfgartner, Maximilian, Schneider, Carina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37165922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1835
_version_ 1785054266989215744
author Weiler‐Wichtl, Liesa Josephine
Leiss, Ulrike
Gojo, Johannes
Kienesberger, Anita
Hansl, Rita
Hopfgartner, Maximilian
Schneider, Carina
author_facet Weiler‐Wichtl, Liesa Josephine
Leiss, Ulrike
Gojo, Johannes
Kienesberger, Anita
Hansl, Rita
Hopfgartner, Maximilian
Schneider, Carina
author_sort Weiler‐Wichtl, Liesa Josephine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in research is still a poorly understood and infrequently practiced concept, although the literature stresses clear benefits for quality of care and research as well as patient satisfaction and empowerment. AIM: The presently described project aimed at using different PPIE methods to evaluate the current state of knowledge about and attitude toward PPIE in research among different stakeholders of pediatric oncology in Europe. Based on the findings a tailored training tool directed toward the different stakeholders will be designed. METHODS AND RESULTS: An interdisciplinary steering group developed a mixed‐method 3‐stage process to (1) investigate the current knowledge and attitudes about PPIE using a Europe‐wide cross‐sectional online survey directed toward health care professionals (n = 134) and the patient group (patients, survivors, family members, …) (n = 168). The results were analyzed quantitatively, focusing on group comparisons (t‐tests, X (2) tests). (2) In a live workshop with n = 36 participants (HCPs and patient group) dual moderation teams (HCPs and patient experts) guided the exploration of effective ways for practicing PPIE. Despite classifying PPIE as relevant, both HCPs and patients indicated a low level of knowledge about the concept and terminology (patients: t(334) = −2.82, p = .004; HCPs: t(270) = −2.88, p = .004). While HCPs assumed to already be involving patients in many research areas, this was not perceived by the patient group (X (2) (1, N = 304) = 42.70, p < .001). HCPs and patients named similar obstacles for implementing PPIE in research, though numerous creative solutions were found during the workshop (engagement). (3) The outcomes were integrated into a training tool (White‐Board movie). CONCLUSION: Although HCPs and patients acknowledge the benefit of PPIE, the presented results highlight the lack of awareness about the concept, and the need for effective tools for researchers to integrate PPIE throughout the entire research process, thereby contributing to a sustainable change within the scientific culture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10242658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102426582023-06-07 Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research Weiler‐Wichtl, Liesa Josephine Leiss, Ulrike Gojo, Johannes Kienesberger, Anita Hansl, Rita Hopfgartner, Maximilian Schneider, Carina Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in research is still a poorly understood and infrequently practiced concept, although the literature stresses clear benefits for quality of care and research as well as patient satisfaction and empowerment. AIM: The presently described project aimed at using different PPIE methods to evaluate the current state of knowledge about and attitude toward PPIE in research among different stakeholders of pediatric oncology in Europe. Based on the findings a tailored training tool directed toward the different stakeholders will be designed. METHODS AND RESULTS: An interdisciplinary steering group developed a mixed‐method 3‐stage process to (1) investigate the current knowledge and attitudes about PPIE using a Europe‐wide cross‐sectional online survey directed toward health care professionals (n = 134) and the patient group (patients, survivors, family members, …) (n = 168). The results were analyzed quantitatively, focusing on group comparisons (t‐tests, X (2) tests). (2) In a live workshop with n = 36 participants (HCPs and patient group) dual moderation teams (HCPs and patient experts) guided the exploration of effective ways for practicing PPIE. Despite classifying PPIE as relevant, both HCPs and patients indicated a low level of knowledge about the concept and terminology (patients: t(334) = −2.82, p = .004; HCPs: t(270) = −2.88, p = .004). While HCPs assumed to already be involving patients in many research areas, this was not perceived by the patient group (X (2) (1, N = 304) = 42.70, p < .001). HCPs and patients named similar obstacles for implementing PPIE in research, though numerous creative solutions were found during the workshop (engagement). (3) The outcomes were integrated into a training tool (White‐Board movie). CONCLUSION: Although HCPs and patients acknowledge the benefit of PPIE, the presented results highlight the lack of awareness about the concept, and the need for effective tools for researchers to integrate PPIE throughout the entire research process, thereby contributing to a sustainable change within the scientific culture. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10242658/ /pubmed/37165922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1835 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Weiler‐Wichtl, Liesa Josephine
Leiss, Ulrike
Gojo, Johannes
Kienesberger, Anita
Hansl, Rita
Hopfgartner, Maximilian
Schneider, Carina
Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research
title Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research
title_full Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research
title_fullStr Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research
title_full_unstemmed Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research
title_short Good to know – This is PPIE! Development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research
title_sort good to know – this is ppie! development of a training tool for public and patient involvement and engagement in pediatric oncological research
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37165922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1835
work_keys_str_mv AT weilerwichtlliesajosephine goodtoknowthisisppiedevelopmentofatrainingtoolforpublicandpatientinvolvementandengagementinpediatriconcologicalresearch
AT leissulrike goodtoknowthisisppiedevelopmentofatrainingtoolforpublicandpatientinvolvementandengagementinpediatriconcologicalresearch
AT gojojohannes goodtoknowthisisppiedevelopmentofatrainingtoolforpublicandpatientinvolvementandengagementinpediatriconcologicalresearch
AT kienesbergeranita goodtoknowthisisppiedevelopmentofatrainingtoolforpublicandpatientinvolvementandengagementinpediatriconcologicalresearch
AT hanslrita goodtoknowthisisppiedevelopmentofatrainingtoolforpublicandpatientinvolvementandengagementinpediatriconcologicalresearch
AT hopfgartnermaximilian goodtoknowthisisppiedevelopmentofatrainingtoolforpublicandpatientinvolvementandengagementinpediatriconcologicalresearch
AT schneidercarina goodtoknowthisisppiedevelopmentofatrainingtoolforpublicandpatientinvolvementandengagementinpediatriconcologicalresearch