Cargando…

Differences in cortical morphology and child internalizing or externalizing problems: Accounting for the co‐occurrence

BACKGROUND: Childhood internalizing and externalizing problems frequently co‐occur. Many studies report neural correlates of either internalizing or externalizing problems, but few account for their co‐occurrence. We aimed to assess specific cortical substrates of these psychiatric problems. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yingzhe, Xu, Bing, Kim, Hannah H., Muetzel, Ryan, Delaney, Scott W., Tiemeier, Henning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37431413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12114
_version_ 1785054302739365888
author Zhang, Yingzhe
Xu, Bing
Kim, Hannah H.
Muetzel, Ryan
Delaney, Scott W.
Tiemeier, Henning
author_facet Zhang, Yingzhe
Xu, Bing
Kim, Hannah H.
Muetzel, Ryan
Delaney, Scott W.
Tiemeier, Henning
author_sort Zhang, Yingzhe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Childhood internalizing and externalizing problems frequently co‐occur. Many studies report neural correlates of either internalizing or externalizing problems, but few account for their co‐occurrence. We aimed to assess specific cortical substrates of these psychiatric problems. METHODS: We used data from 9635 children aged 9–11 years in the baseline Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. Internalizing and externalizing problem composite scales scores were derived from the Child Behavior Checklist. We standardized FreeSurfer‐derived volumes of 68 cortical regions. We examined internalizing and externalizing problems separately and jointly (covariate‐adjustment) in relation to cortical volumes, with and without adjusting for total brain volume (TBV) in multivariate linear regressions adjusted for demographics and multiple comparisons. We fit bifactor models to confirm the consistency of patterns exploring specific internalizing and specific externalizing problems. Sensitivity analyses included a vertex‐wide analysis and a replication in another large population‐based study. RESULTS: In separate TBV‐unadjusted analyses, externalizing and internalizing problems were associated with smaller cortical volumes. If adjusted for externalizing behavior, however, larger cortical volumes were associated with internalizing problems, while smaller cortical volumes remained associated with externalizing problems after adjustment for internalizing problems. The bifactor model produced similar results, which were consistently replicated in another pre‐adolescent neuroimaging sample. These associations likely represent global effects: adjusting for TBV rendered most associations non‐significant. Vertex‐wise analyses confirmed global patterns. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that internalizing and externalizing problems have globally opposing, and non‐specific associations with cortical morphology in childhood, which are only apparent if analyses account for their co‐occurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10242825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102428252023-07-10 Differences in cortical morphology and child internalizing or externalizing problems: Accounting for the co‐occurrence Zhang, Yingzhe Xu, Bing Kim, Hannah H. Muetzel, Ryan Delaney, Scott W. Tiemeier, Henning JCPP Adv Original Articles BACKGROUND: Childhood internalizing and externalizing problems frequently co‐occur. Many studies report neural correlates of either internalizing or externalizing problems, but few account for their co‐occurrence. We aimed to assess specific cortical substrates of these psychiatric problems. METHODS: We used data from 9635 children aged 9–11 years in the baseline Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. Internalizing and externalizing problem composite scales scores were derived from the Child Behavior Checklist. We standardized FreeSurfer‐derived volumes of 68 cortical regions. We examined internalizing and externalizing problems separately and jointly (covariate‐adjustment) in relation to cortical volumes, with and without adjusting for total brain volume (TBV) in multivariate linear regressions adjusted for demographics and multiple comparisons. We fit bifactor models to confirm the consistency of patterns exploring specific internalizing and specific externalizing problems. Sensitivity analyses included a vertex‐wide analysis and a replication in another large population‐based study. RESULTS: In separate TBV‐unadjusted analyses, externalizing and internalizing problems were associated with smaller cortical volumes. If adjusted for externalizing behavior, however, larger cortical volumes were associated with internalizing problems, while smaller cortical volumes remained associated with externalizing problems after adjustment for internalizing problems. The bifactor model produced similar results, which were consistently replicated in another pre‐adolescent neuroimaging sample. These associations likely represent global effects: adjusting for TBV rendered most associations non‐significant. Vertex‐wise analyses confirmed global patterns. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that internalizing and externalizing problems have globally opposing, and non‐specific associations with cortical morphology in childhood, which are only apparent if analyses account for their co‐occurrence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10242825/ /pubmed/37431413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12114 Text en © 2022 The Authors. JCPP Advances published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zhang, Yingzhe
Xu, Bing
Kim, Hannah H.
Muetzel, Ryan
Delaney, Scott W.
Tiemeier, Henning
Differences in cortical morphology and child internalizing or externalizing problems: Accounting for the co‐occurrence
title Differences in cortical morphology and child internalizing or externalizing problems: Accounting for the co‐occurrence
title_full Differences in cortical morphology and child internalizing or externalizing problems: Accounting for the co‐occurrence
title_fullStr Differences in cortical morphology and child internalizing or externalizing problems: Accounting for the co‐occurrence
title_full_unstemmed Differences in cortical morphology and child internalizing or externalizing problems: Accounting for the co‐occurrence
title_short Differences in cortical morphology and child internalizing or externalizing problems: Accounting for the co‐occurrence
title_sort differences in cortical morphology and child internalizing or externalizing problems: accounting for the co‐occurrence
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10242825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37431413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12114
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyingzhe differencesincorticalmorphologyandchildinternalizingorexternalizingproblemsaccountingforthecooccurrence
AT xubing differencesincorticalmorphologyandchildinternalizingorexternalizingproblemsaccountingforthecooccurrence
AT kimhannahh differencesincorticalmorphologyandchildinternalizingorexternalizingproblemsaccountingforthecooccurrence
AT muetzelryan differencesincorticalmorphologyandchildinternalizingorexternalizingproblemsaccountingforthecooccurrence
AT delaneyscottw differencesincorticalmorphologyandchildinternalizingorexternalizingproblemsaccountingforthecooccurrence
AT tiemeierhenning differencesincorticalmorphologyandchildinternalizingorexternalizingproblemsaccountingforthecooccurrence