Cargando…
Deep learning model for automatic image quality assessment in PET
BACKGROUND: A variety of external factors might seriously degrade PET image quality and lead to inconsistent results. The aim of this study is to explore a potential PET image quality assessment (QA) method with deep learning (DL). METHODS: A total of 89 PET images were acquired from Peking Union Me...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01017-2 |
_version_ | 1785054352871784448 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Haiqiong Liu, Yu Wang, Yanmei Ma, Yanru Niu, Na Jing, Hongli Huo, Li |
author_facet | Zhang, Haiqiong Liu, Yu Wang, Yanmei Ma, Yanru Niu, Na Jing, Hongli Huo, Li |
author_sort | Zhang, Haiqiong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A variety of external factors might seriously degrade PET image quality and lead to inconsistent results. The aim of this study is to explore a potential PET image quality assessment (QA) method with deep learning (DL). METHODS: A total of 89 PET images were acquired from Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) in China in this study. Ground-truth quality for images was assessed by two senior radiologists and classified into five grades (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3, grade 4, and grade 5). Grade 5 is the best image quality. After preprocessing, the Dense Convolutional Network (DenseNet) was trained to automatically recognize optimal- and poor-quality PET images. Accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and area under the ROC Curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic properties of all models. All indicators of models were assessed using fivefold cross-validation. An image quality QA tool was developed based on our deep learning model. A PET QA report can be automatically obtained after inputting PET images. RESULTS: Four tasks were generated. Task2 showed worst performance in AUC,ACC, specificity and sensitivity among 4 tasks, and task1 showed unstable performance between training and testing and task3 showed low specificity in both training and testing. Task 4 showed the best diagnostic properties and discriminative performance between poor image quality (grade 1, grade 2) and good quality (grade 3, grade 4, grade 5) images. The automated quality assessment of task 4 showed ACC = 0.77, specificity = 0.71, and sensitivity = 0.83, in the train set; ACC = 0.85, specificity = 0.79, and sensitivity = 0.91, in the test set, respectively. The ROC measuring performance of task 4 had an AUC of 0.86 in the train set and 0.91 in the test set. The image QA tool could output basic information of images, scan and reconstruction parameters, typical instances of PET images, and deep learning score. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the feasibility of the assessment of image quality in PET images using a deep learning model, which may assist with accelerating clinical research by reliably assessing image quality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-023-01017-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10243071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102430712023-06-07 Deep learning model for automatic image quality assessment in PET Zhang, Haiqiong Liu, Yu Wang, Yanmei Ma, Yanru Niu, Na Jing, Hongli Huo, Li BMC Med Imaging Research BACKGROUND: A variety of external factors might seriously degrade PET image quality and lead to inconsistent results. The aim of this study is to explore a potential PET image quality assessment (QA) method with deep learning (DL). METHODS: A total of 89 PET images were acquired from Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) in China in this study. Ground-truth quality for images was assessed by two senior radiologists and classified into five grades (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3, grade 4, and grade 5). Grade 5 is the best image quality. After preprocessing, the Dense Convolutional Network (DenseNet) was trained to automatically recognize optimal- and poor-quality PET images. Accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and area under the ROC Curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic properties of all models. All indicators of models were assessed using fivefold cross-validation. An image quality QA tool was developed based on our deep learning model. A PET QA report can be automatically obtained after inputting PET images. RESULTS: Four tasks were generated. Task2 showed worst performance in AUC,ACC, specificity and sensitivity among 4 tasks, and task1 showed unstable performance between training and testing and task3 showed low specificity in both training and testing. Task 4 showed the best diagnostic properties and discriminative performance between poor image quality (grade 1, grade 2) and good quality (grade 3, grade 4, grade 5) images. The automated quality assessment of task 4 showed ACC = 0.77, specificity = 0.71, and sensitivity = 0.83, in the train set; ACC = 0.85, specificity = 0.79, and sensitivity = 0.91, in the test set, respectively. The ROC measuring performance of task 4 had an AUC of 0.86 in the train set and 0.91 in the test set. The image QA tool could output basic information of images, scan and reconstruction parameters, typical instances of PET images, and deep learning score. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the feasibility of the assessment of image quality in PET images using a deep learning model, which may assist with accelerating clinical research by reliably assessing image quality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-023-01017-2. BioMed Central 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10243071/ /pubmed/37277706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01017-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhang, Haiqiong Liu, Yu Wang, Yanmei Ma, Yanru Niu, Na Jing, Hongli Huo, Li Deep learning model for automatic image quality assessment in PET |
title | Deep learning model for automatic image quality assessment in PET |
title_full | Deep learning model for automatic image quality assessment in PET |
title_fullStr | Deep learning model for automatic image quality assessment in PET |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep learning model for automatic image quality assessment in PET |
title_short | Deep learning model for automatic image quality assessment in PET |
title_sort | deep learning model for automatic image quality assessment in pet |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01017-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanghaiqiong deeplearningmodelforautomaticimagequalityassessmentinpet AT liuyu deeplearningmodelforautomaticimagequalityassessmentinpet AT wangyanmei deeplearningmodelforautomaticimagequalityassessmentinpet AT mayanru deeplearningmodelforautomaticimagequalityassessmentinpet AT niuna deeplearningmodelforautomaticimagequalityassessmentinpet AT jinghongli deeplearningmodelforautomaticimagequalityassessmentinpet AT huoli deeplearningmodelforautomaticimagequalityassessmentinpet |