Cargando…
Documenting heritage language experience using questionnaires
INTRODUCTION: There exists a great degree of variability in the documentation of multilingual experience across different instruments. The present paper contributes to the “methods turn” and individual differences focus in (heritage) bilingualism by proposing a comprehensive online questionnaire bui...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37287789 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131374 |
_version_ | 1785054367336890368 |
---|---|
author | Tomić, Aleksandra Rodina, Yulia Bayram, Fatih De Cat, Cécile |
author_facet | Tomić, Aleksandra Rodina, Yulia Bayram, Fatih De Cat, Cécile |
author_sort | Tomić, Aleksandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There exists a great degree of variability in the documentation of multilingual experience across different instruments. The present paper contributes to the “methods turn” and individual differences focus in (heritage) bilingualism by proposing a comprehensive online questionnaire building on existing questionnaires and the experience of using them to document heritage bilingualism: the Heritage Language Experience (HeLEx) online questionnaire. HeLEx is validated against and contrasted to an extended version of the Language and Social Background Questionnaire designed for heritage speakers (HSs), LSBQ-H. METHODS: We compare data elicited with both questionnaires in turn from a group of Turkish HSs (n = 174, mean age=32). Our validation focuses on traditional language background variables, including language exposure and use, language proficiency, language dominance, as well as a more novel measure of language entropy. The analyses are based on a subset of key questions from each questionnaire that capture language experience for up to five languages, four modalities, and five social contexts. In a subsequent set of analyses, we explore the impact of different types of response scales, response mechanisms, and manners of variable derivation on the informativity of the data they can provide, in terms of the scope, granularity and distributional properties of the derived measures. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Our results show that both HeLEx and LSBQ-H are successful at detecting the important distributional patterns in the data and reveal a number of advantages of HeLEx. In the discussion, we consider the impact of methodological choices regarding question phrasing, visual format, response options, and response mechanisms. We emphasize that these choices are not trivial and can affect the derived measures and subsequent analyses on the impact of individual differences on language acquisition and processing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10243138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102431382023-06-07 Documenting heritage language experience using questionnaires Tomić, Aleksandra Rodina, Yulia Bayram, Fatih De Cat, Cécile Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: There exists a great degree of variability in the documentation of multilingual experience across different instruments. The present paper contributes to the “methods turn” and individual differences focus in (heritage) bilingualism by proposing a comprehensive online questionnaire building on existing questionnaires and the experience of using them to document heritage bilingualism: the Heritage Language Experience (HeLEx) online questionnaire. HeLEx is validated against and contrasted to an extended version of the Language and Social Background Questionnaire designed for heritage speakers (HSs), LSBQ-H. METHODS: We compare data elicited with both questionnaires in turn from a group of Turkish HSs (n = 174, mean age=32). Our validation focuses on traditional language background variables, including language exposure and use, language proficiency, language dominance, as well as a more novel measure of language entropy. The analyses are based on a subset of key questions from each questionnaire that capture language experience for up to five languages, four modalities, and five social contexts. In a subsequent set of analyses, we explore the impact of different types of response scales, response mechanisms, and manners of variable derivation on the informativity of the data they can provide, in terms of the scope, granularity and distributional properties of the derived measures. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Our results show that both HeLEx and LSBQ-H are successful at detecting the important distributional patterns in the data and reveal a number of advantages of HeLEx. In the discussion, we consider the impact of methodological choices regarding question phrasing, visual format, response options, and response mechanisms. We emphasize that these choices are not trivial and can affect the derived measures and subsequent analyses on the impact of individual differences on language acquisition and processing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10243138/ /pubmed/37287789 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131374 Text en Copyright © 2023 Tomić, Rodina, Bayram and De Cat. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Tomić, Aleksandra Rodina, Yulia Bayram, Fatih De Cat, Cécile Documenting heritage language experience using questionnaires |
title | Documenting heritage language experience using questionnaires |
title_full | Documenting heritage language experience using questionnaires |
title_fullStr | Documenting heritage language experience using questionnaires |
title_full_unstemmed | Documenting heritage language experience using questionnaires |
title_short | Documenting heritage language experience using questionnaires |
title_sort | documenting heritage language experience using questionnaires |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37287789 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tomicaleksandra documentingheritagelanguageexperienceusingquestionnaires AT rodinayulia documentingheritagelanguageexperienceusingquestionnaires AT bayramfatih documentingheritagelanguageexperienceusingquestionnaires AT decatcecile documentingheritagelanguageexperienceusingquestionnaires |