Cargando…

Comparison between original SARS-CoV-2 strain and omicron variant on thin-section chest CT imaging of COVID-19 pneumonia

OBJECTIVES: We investigated different computed tomography (CT) features between Omicron-variant and original-strain SARS-CoV‑2 pneumonia to facilitate the clinical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to select patients with original-strain SARS-CoV‑2 pneu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: pingping, Zeng, Yanyu, Zhou, Xuri, Sun, Qiming, Huang, Yi, Wang, Guoliang, Tan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37280418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00117-023-01147-2
_version_ 1785054395839283200
author pingping, Zeng
Yanyu, Zhou
Xuri, Sun
Qiming, Huang
Yi, Wang
Guoliang, Tan
author_facet pingping, Zeng
Yanyu, Zhou
Xuri, Sun
Qiming, Huang
Yi, Wang
Guoliang, Tan
author_sort pingping, Zeng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We investigated different computed tomography (CT) features between Omicron-variant and original-strain SARS-CoV‑2 pneumonia to facilitate the clinical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to select patients with original-strain SARS-CoV‑2 pneumonia from February 22 to April 22, 2020, or Omicron-variant SARS-CoV‑2 pneumonia from March 26 to May 31, 2022. Data on the demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, clinical types, and CT features were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 62 and 78 patients with original-strain or Omicron-variant SARS-CoV‑2 pneumonia, respectively. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, clinical types, symptoms, and comorbidities. The main CT features differed between the two groups (p = 0.003). There were 37 (59.7%) and 20 (25.6%) patients with ground-glass opacities (GGO) in the original-strain and Omicron-variant pneumonia, respectively. A consolidation pattern was more frequently observed in the Omicron-variant than original-strain pneumonia (62.8% vs. 24.2%). There was no difference in crazy-paving pattern between the original-strain and Omicron-variant pneumonia (16.1% vs. 11.6%). Pleural effusion was observed more often in Omicron-variant pneumonia, while subpleural lesions were more common in the original-strain pneumonia. The CT score in the Omicron-variant group was higher than that in the original-strain group for critical-type (17.00, 16.00–18.00 vs. 16.00, 14.00–17.00, p = 0.031) and for severe-type (13.00, 12.00–14.00 vs 12.00, 10.75–13.00, p = 0.027) pneumonia. CONCLUSION: The main CT finding of the Omicron-variant SARS-CoV‑2 pneumonia included consolidations and pleural effusion. By contrast, CT findings of original-strain SARS-CoV‑2 pneumonia showed frequent GGO and subpleural lesions, but without pleural effusion. The CT scores were also higher in the critical and severe types of Omicron-variant than original-strain pneumonia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10243278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102432782023-06-07 Comparison between original SARS-CoV-2 strain and omicron variant on thin-section chest CT imaging of COVID-19 pneumonia pingping, Zeng Yanyu, Zhou Xuri, Sun Qiming, Huang Yi, Wang Guoliang, Tan Radiologie (Heidelb) Original Articles OBJECTIVES: We investigated different computed tomography (CT) features between Omicron-variant and original-strain SARS-CoV‑2 pneumonia to facilitate the clinical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to select patients with original-strain SARS-CoV‑2 pneumonia from February 22 to April 22, 2020, or Omicron-variant SARS-CoV‑2 pneumonia from March 26 to May 31, 2022. Data on the demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, clinical types, and CT features were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 62 and 78 patients with original-strain or Omicron-variant SARS-CoV‑2 pneumonia, respectively. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, clinical types, symptoms, and comorbidities. The main CT features differed between the two groups (p = 0.003). There were 37 (59.7%) and 20 (25.6%) patients with ground-glass opacities (GGO) in the original-strain and Omicron-variant pneumonia, respectively. A consolidation pattern was more frequently observed in the Omicron-variant than original-strain pneumonia (62.8% vs. 24.2%). There was no difference in crazy-paving pattern between the original-strain and Omicron-variant pneumonia (16.1% vs. 11.6%). Pleural effusion was observed more often in Omicron-variant pneumonia, while subpleural lesions were more common in the original-strain pneumonia. The CT score in the Omicron-variant group was higher than that in the original-strain group for critical-type (17.00, 16.00–18.00 vs. 16.00, 14.00–17.00, p = 0.031) and for severe-type (13.00, 12.00–14.00 vs 12.00, 10.75–13.00, p = 0.027) pneumonia. CONCLUSION: The main CT finding of the Omicron-variant SARS-CoV‑2 pneumonia included consolidations and pleural effusion. By contrast, CT findings of original-strain SARS-CoV‑2 pneumonia showed frequent GGO and subpleural lesions, but without pleural effusion. The CT scores were also higher in the critical and severe types of Omicron-variant than original-strain pneumonia. Springer Medizin 2023-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10243278/ /pubmed/37280418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00117-023-01147-2 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2023 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Articles
pingping, Zeng
Yanyu, Zhou
Xuri, Sun
Qiming, Huang
Yi, Wang
Guoliang, Tan
Comparison between original SARS-CoV-2 strain and omicron variant on thin-section chest CT imaging of COVID-19 pneumonia
title Comparison between original SARS-CoV-2 strain and omicron variant on thin-section chest CT imaging of COVID-19 pneumonia
title_full Comparison between original SARS-CoV-2 strain and omicron variant on thin-section chest CT imaging of COVID-19 pneumonia
title_fullStr Comparison between original SARS-CoV-2 strain and omicron variant on thin-section chest CT imaging of COVID-19 pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between original SARS-CoV-2 strain and omicron variant on thin-section chest CT imaging of COVID-19 pneumonia
title_short Comparison between original SARS-CoV-2 strain and omicron variant on thin-section chest CT imaging of COVID-19 pneumonia
title_sort comparison between original sars-cov-2 strain and omicron variant on thin-section chest ct imaging of covid-19 pneumonia
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37280418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00117-023-01147-2
work_keys_str_mv AT pingpingzeng comparisonbetweenoriginalsarscov2strainandomicronvariantonthinsectionchestctimagingofcovid19pneumonia
AT yanyuzhou comparisonbetweenoriginalsarscov2strainandomicronvariantonthinsectionchestctimagingofcovid19pneumonia
AT xurisun comparisonbetweenoriginalsarscov2strainandomicronvariantonthinsectionchestctimagingofcovid19pneumonia
AT qiminghuang comparisonbetweenoriginalsarscov2strainandomicronvariantonthinsectionchestctimagingofcovid19pneumonia
AT yiwang comparisonbetweenoriginalsarscov2strainandomicronvariantonthinsectionchestctimagingofcovid19pneumonia
AT guoliangtan comparisonbetweenoriginalsarscov2strainandomicronvariantonthinsectionchestctimagingofcovid19pneumonia