Cargando…
The effect of integrating knowledge‐based planning with multicriteria optimization in treatment planning for prostate SBRT
Knowledge‐based planning (KBP) and multicriteria optimization (MCO) are two powerful tools to assist treatment planners in achieving optimal target coverage and organ‐at‐risk (OAR) sparing. The purpose of this work is to investigate if integrating MCO with conventional KBP can further improve treatm...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36827178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13940 |
_version_ | 1785054405054169088 |
---|---|
author | Jayarathna, Sandun Shen, Xinglei Chen, Ronald C. Li, H. Harold Guida, Kenny |
author_facet | Jayarathna, Sandun Shen, Xinglei Chen, Ronald C. Li, H. Harold Guida, Kenny |
author_sort | Jayarathna, Sandun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Knowledge‐based planning (KBP) and multicriteria optimization (MCO) are two powerful tools to assist treatment planners in achieving optimal target coverage and organ‐at‐risk (OAR) sparing. The purpose of this work is to investigate if integrating MCO with conventional KBP can further improve treatment plan quality for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). A two‐phase study was designed to investigate the impact of MCO and KBP in prostate SBRT treatment planning. The first phase involved the creation of a KBP model based on thirty clinical SBRT plans, generated by manual optimization (KBP_M). A ten‐patient validation cohort was used to compare manual, MCO, and KBP_M optimization techniques. The next phase involved replanning the original model cohort with additional tradeoff optimization via MCO to create a second model, KBP_MCO. Plans were then generated using linear integration (KBP_M+MCO), non‐linear integration (KBP_MCO), and a combination of integration methods (KBP_MCO+MCO). All plans were analyzed for planning target volume (PTV) coverage, OAR constraints, and plan quality metrics. Comparisons were generated to evaluate plan and model quality. Phase 1 highlighted the necessity of KBP and MCO in treatment planning, as both optimization methods improved plan quality metrics (Conformity and Heterogeneity Indices) and reduced mean rectal dose by 2 Gy, as compared to manual planning. Integrating MCO with KBP did not further improve plan quality, as little significance was seen over KBP or MCO alone. Principal component score (PCS) fitting showed KBP_MCO improved bladder and rectum estimated and modeled dose correlation by 5% and 22%, respectively; however, model improvements did not significantly impact plan quality. KBP and MCO have shown to reduce OAR dose while maintaining desired PTV coverage in this study. Further integration of KBP and MCO did not show marked improvements in treatment plan quality while requiring increased time in model generation and optimization time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10243332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102433322023-06-07 The effect of integrating knowledge‐based planning with multicriteria optimization in treatment planning for prostate SBRT Jayarathna, Sandun Shen, Xinglei Chen, Ronald C. Li, H. Harold Guida, Kenny J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Knowledge‐based planning (KBP) and multicriteria optimization (MCO) are two powerful tools to assist treatment planners in achieving optimal target coverage and organ‐at‐risk (OAR) sparing. The purpose of this work is to investigate if integrating MCO with conventional KBP can further improve treatment plan quality for prostate cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). A two‐phase study was designed to investigate the impact of MCO and KBP in prostate SBRT treatment planning. The first phase involved the creation of a KBP model based on thirty clinical SBRT plans, generated by manual optimization (KBP_M). A ten‐patient validation cohort was used to compare manual, MCO, and KBP_M optimization techniques. The next phase involved replanning the original model cohort with additional tradeoff optimization via MCO to create a second model, KBP_MCO. Plans were then generated using linear integration (KBP_M+MCO), non‐linear integration (KBP_MCO), and a combination of integration methods (KBP_MCO+MCO). All plans were analyzed for planning target volume (PTV) coverage, OAR constraints, and plan quality metrics. Comparisons were generated to evaluate plan and model quality. Phase 1 highlighted the necessity of KBP and MCO in treatment planning, as both optimization methods improved plan quality metrics (Conformity and Heterogeneity Indices) and reduced mean rectal dose by 2 Gy, as compared to manual planning. Integrating MCO with KBP did not further improve plan quality, as little significance was seen over KBP or MCO alone. Principal component score (PCS) fitting showed KBP_MCO improved bladder and rectum estimated and modeled dose correlation by 5% and 22%, respectively; however, model improvements did not significantly impact plan quality. KBP and MCO have shown to reduce OAR dose while maintaining desired PTV coverage in this study. Further integration of KBP and MCO did not show marked improvements in treatment plan quality while requiring increased time in model generation and optimization time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10243332/ /pubmed/36827178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13940 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Jayarathna, Sandun Shen, Xinglei Chen, Ronald C. Li, H. Harold Guida, Kenny The effect of integrating knowledge‐based planning with multicriteria optimization in treatment planning for prostate SBRT |
title | The effect of integrating knowledge‐based planning with multicriteria optimization in treatment planning for prostate SBRT |
title_full | The effect of integrating knowledge‐based planning with multicriteria optimization in treatment planning for prostate SBRT |
title_fullStr | The effect of integrating knowledge‐based planning with multicriteria optimization in treatment planning for prostate SBRT |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of integrating knowledge‐based planning with multicriteria optimization in treatment planning for prostate SBRT |
title_short | The effect of integrating knowledge‐based planning with multicriteria optimization in treatment planning for prostate SBRT |
title_sort | effect of integrating knowledge‐based planning with multicriteria optimization in treatment planning for prostate sbrt |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36827178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13940 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jayarathnasandun theeffectofintegratingknowledgebasedplanningwithmulticriteriaoptimizationintreatmentplanningforprostatesbrt AT shenxinglei theeffectofintegratingknowledgebasedplanningwithmulticriteriaoptimizationintreatmentplanningforprostatesbrt AT chenronaldc theeffectofintegratingknowledgebasedplanningwithmulticriteriaoptimizationintreatmentplanningforprostatesbrt AT lihharold theeffectofintegratingknowledgebasedplanningwithmulticriteriaoptimizationintreatmentplanningforprostatesbrt AT guidakenny theeffectofintegratingknowledgebasedplanningwithmulticriteriaoptimizationintreatmentplanningforprostatesbrt AT jayarathnasandun effectofintegratingknowledgebasedplanningwithmulticriteriaoptimizationintreatmentplanningforprostatesbrt AT shenxinglei effectofintegratingknowledgebasedplanningwithmulticriteriaoptimizationintreatmentplanningforprostatesbrt AT chenronaldc effectofintegratingknowledgebasedplanningwithmulticriteriaoptimizationintreatmentplanningforprostatesbrt AT lihharold effectofintegratingknowledgebasedplanningwithmulticriteriaoptimizationintreatmentplanningforprostatesbrt AT guidakenny effectofintegratingknowledgebasedplanningwithmulticriteriaoptimizationintreatmentplanningforprostatesbrt |