Cargando…

Comparison of Dental and Skeletal Age Estimating Methods in Children

OBJECTIVES: Estimating age is a crucial determinant of forensic science. Various methods have been used to estimate dental age (DA) and skeletal age (SA).The aim of the current study was to compare the Cameriere’s DA method with the Cameriere’s SA method in estimating CA in children. MATERIALS AND M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Güler, Özge Çelik, Deniz, Yeşim, Arslan, Semiha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37288153
http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc57/1/1
_version_ 1785054485615214592
author Güler, Özge Çelik
Deniz, Yeşim
Arslan, Semiha
author_facet Güler, Özge Çelik
Deniz, Yeşim
Arslan, Semiha
author_sort Güler, Özge Çelik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Estimating age is a crucial determinant of forensic science. Various methods have been used to estimate dental age (DA) and skeletal age (SA).The aim of the current study was to compare the Cameriere’s DA method with the Cameriere’s SA method in estimating CA in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 216 radiographs of 130 females and 86 males (between 9 to 14.99 years of age) were evaluated in northwestern Turkey. DA was calculated on the panoramic images using Cameriere’s open-apex method. SA was determined on the lateral cephalograms using the fourth cervical vertebrae method by Cameriere. The DA, SA, and CA data were compared using a paired t-test and Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The mean CA of all groups was calculated as 12.96±0.30, the mean DA of 12.74±0.68 and the mean SA of 12.89±0.89. In males, the DA method presented an underestimation between ages of 14.00 and 14.99 (p<0.05) and an overestimation between ages 9.00 and 11.99 (p<0.05). In females, the DA method showed an underestimation in the 13.00- and 14.99-year-old age groups (p<0.05) and an overestimation in the 10.00- and 11.99-year-old age groups (p<0.05). The SA method revealed a significant underestimation in females between the ages of 13.00 and 14.99 and in males between the ages of 14.00 and 14.99 (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The SA estimation method may provide more accurate results compared to the DA method with children of both sexes aged between 9.00 to 12.99 in the determination of CA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10243714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102437142023-06-07 Comparison of Dental and Skeletal Age Estimating Methods in Children Güler, Özge Çelik Deniz, Yeşim Arslan, Semiha Acta Stomatol Croat Original Scientific Papers OBJECTIVES: Estimating age is a crucial determinant of forensic science. Various methods have been used to estimate dental age (DA) and skeletal age (SA).The aim of the current study was to compare the Cameriere’s DA method with the Cameriere’s SA method in estimating CA in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 216 radiographs of 130 females and 86 males (between 9 to 14.99 years of age) were evaluated in northwestern Turkey. DA was calculated on the panoramic images using Cameriere’s open-apex method. SA was determined on the lateral cephalograms using the fourth cervical vertebrae method by Cameriere. The DA, SA, and CA data were compared using a paired t-test and Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The mean CA of all groups was calculated as 12.96±0.30, the mean DA of 12.74±0.68 and the mean SA of 12.89±0.89. In males, the DA method presented an underestimation between ages of 14.00 and 14.99 (p<0.05) and an overestimation between ages 9.00 and 11.99 (p<0.05). In females, the DA method showed an underestimation in the 13.00- and 14.99-year-old age groups (p<0.05) and an overestimation in the 10.00- and 11.99-year-old age groups (p<0.05). The SA method revealed a significant underestimation in females between the ages of 13.00 and 14.99 and in males between the ages of 14.00 and 14.99 (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The SA estimation method may provide more accurate results compared to the DA method with children of both sexes aged between 9.00 to 12.99 in the determination of CA. University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10243714/ /pubmed/37288153 http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc57/1/1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Scientific Papers
Güler, Özge Çelik
Deniz, Yeşim
Arslan, Semiha
Comparison of Dental and Skeletal Age Estimating Methods in Children
title Comparison of Dental and Skeletal Age Estimating Methods in Children
title_full Comparison of Dental and Skeletal Age Estimating Methods in Children
title_fullStr Comparison of Dental and Skeletal Age Estimating Methods in Children
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Dental and Skeletal Age Estimating Methods in Children
title_short Comparison of Dental and Skeletal Age Estimating Methods in Children
title_sort comparison of dental and skeletal age estimating methods in children
topic Original Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37288153
http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc57/1/1
work_keys_str_mv AT gulerozgecelik comparisonofdentalandskeletalageestimatingmethodsinchildren
AT denizyesim comparisonofdentalandskeletalageestimatingmethodsinchildren
AT arslansemiha comparisonofdentalandskeletalageestimatingmethodsinchildren