Cargando…
Analysis of Female Participant Representation in Registered Oncology Clinical Trials in the United States from 2008 to 2020
BACKGROUND: Female underrepresentation in oncology clinical trials can result in outcome disparities. We evaluated female participant representation in US oncology trials by intervention type, cancer site, and funding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were extracted from the publicly available Aggregate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36848266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyad009 |
_version_ | 1785054495795838976 |
---|---|
author | Perera, Nirosha D Bellomo, Tiffany R Schmidt, Walker M Litt, Henry K Shyu, Margaret Stavins, MaKenna A Wang, Max M Bell, Alexander Saleki, Massoud Wolf, Katherine I Ionescu, Ruxandra Tao, Jacqueline J Ji, Sunjong O’Keefe, Ryan M Pun, Matthew Takasugi, Jordan M Steinberg, Jecca R Go, Ronald S Turner, Brandon E Mahipal, Amit |
author_facet | Perera, Nirosha D Bellomo, Tiffany R Schmidt, Walker M Litt, Henry K Shyu, Margaret Stavins, MaKenna A Wang, Max M Bell, Alexander Saleki, Massoud Wolf, Katherine I Ionescu, Ruxandra Tao, Jacqueline J Ji, Sunjong O’Keefe, Ryan M Pun, Matthew Takasugi, Jordan M Steinberg, Jecca R Go, Ronald S Turner, Brandon E Mahipal, Amit |
author_sort | Perera, Nirosha D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Female underrepresentation in oncology clinical trials can result in outcome disparities. We evaluated female participant representation in US oncology trials by intervention type, cancer site, and funding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were extracted from the publicly available Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database. Initially, 270,172 studies were identified. Following the exclusion of trials using Medical Subject Heading terms, manual review, those with incomplete status, non-US location, sex-specific organ cancers, or lacking participant sex data, 1650 trials consisting of 240,776 participants remained. The primary outcome was participation to prevalence ratio (PPR): percent females among trial participants divided by percent females in the disease population per US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data. PPRs of 0.8-1.2 reflect proportional female representation. RESULTS: Females represented 46.9% of participants (95% CI, 45.4-48.4); mean PPR for all trials was 0.912. Females were underrepresented in surgical (PPR 0.74) and other invasive (PPR 0.69) oncology trials. Among cancer sites, females were underrepresented in bladder (odds ratio [OR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.26-0.91, P = .02), head/neck (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.68, P < .01), stomach (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23-0.70, P < .01), and esophageal (OR 0.40 95% CI 0.22-0.74, P < .01) trials. Hematologic (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-1.82, P < .01) and pancreatic (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.46-3.26, P < .01) trials had higher odds of proportional female representation. Industry-funded trials had greater odds of proportional female representation (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.09-1.82, P = .01) than US government and academic-funded trials. CONCLUSIONS: Stakeholders should look to hematologic, pancreatic, and industry-funded cancer trials as exemplars of female participant representation and consider female representation when interpreting trial results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10243778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102437782023-06-07 Analysis of Female Participant Representation in Registered Oncology Clinical Trials in the United States from 2008 to 2020 Perera, Nirosha D Bellomo, Tiffany R Schmidt, Walker M Litt, Henry K Shyu, Margaret Stavins, MaKenna A Wang, Max M Bell, Alexander Saleki, Massoud Wolf, Katherine I Ionescu, Ruxandra Tao, Jacqueline J Ji, Sunjong O’Keefe, Ryan M Pun, Matthew Takasugi, Jordan M Steinberg, Jecca R Go, Ronald S Turner, Brandon E Mahipal, Amit Oncologist Health Outcomes and Economics of Cancer Care BACKGROUND: Female underrepresentation in oncology clinical trials can result in outcome disparities. We evaluated female participant representation in US oncology trials by intervention type, cancer site, and funding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were extracted from the publicly available Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database. Initially, 270,172 studies were identified. Following the exclusion of trials using Medical Subject Heading terms, manual review, those with incomplete status, non-US location, sex-specific organ cancers, or lacking participant sex data, 1650 trials consisting of 240,776 participants remained. The primary outcome was participation to prevalence ratio (PPR): percent females among trial participants divided by percent females in the disease population per US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data. PPRs of 0.8-1.2 reflect proportional female representation. RESULTS: Females represented 46.9% of participants (95% CI, 45.4-48.4); mean PPR for all trials was 0.912. Females were underrepresented in surgical (PPR 0.74) and other invasive (PPR 0.69) oncology trials. Among cancer sites, females were underrepresented in bladder (odds ratio [OR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.26-0.91, P = .02), head/neck (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.68, P < .01), stomach (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23-0.70, P < .01), and esophageal (OR 0.40 95% CI 0.22-0.74, P < .01) trials. Hematologic (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-1.82, P < .01) and pancreatic (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.46-3.26, P < .01) trials had higher odds of proportional female representation. Industry-funded trials had greater odds of proportional female representation (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.09-1.82, P = .01) than US government and academic-funded trials. CONCLUSIONS: Stakeholders should look to hematologic, pancreatic, and industry-funded cancer trials as exemplars of female participant representation and consider female representation when interpreting trial results. Oxford University Press 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10243778/ /pubmed/36848266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyad009 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. |
spellingShingle | Health Outcomes and Economics of Cancer Care Perera, Nirosha D Bellomo, Tiffany R Schmidt, Walker M Litt, Henry K Shyu, Margaret Stavins, MaKenna A Wang, Max M Bell, Alexander Saleki, Massoud Wolf, Katherine I Ionescu, Ruxandra Tao, Jacqueline J Ji, Sunjong O’Keefe, Ryan M Pun, Matthew Takasugi, Jordan M Steinberg, Jecca R Go, Ronald S Turner, Brandon E Mahipal, Amit Analysis of Female Participant Representation in Registered Oncology Clinical Trials in the United States from 2008 to 2020 |
title | Analysis of Female Participant Representation in Registered Oncology Clinical Trials in the United States from 2008 to 2020 |
title_full | Analysis of Female Participant Representation in Registered Oncology Clinical Trials in the United States from 2008 to 2020 |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Female Participant Representation in Registered Oncology Clinical Trials in the United States from 2008 to 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Female Participant Representation in Registered Oncology Clinical Trials in the United States from 2008 to 2020 |
title_short | Analysis of Female Participant Representation in Registered Oncology Clinical Trials in the United States from 2008 to 2020 |
title_sort | analysis of female participant representation in registered oncology clinical trials in the united states from 2008 to 2020 |
topic | Health Outcomes and Economics of Cancer Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36848266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyad009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pereraniroshad analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT bellomotiffanyr analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT schmidtwalkerm analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT litthenryk analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT shyumargaret analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT stavinsmakennaa analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT wangmaxm analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT bellalexander analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT salekimassoud analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT wolfkatherinei analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT ionescuruxandra analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT taojacquelinej analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT jisunjong analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT okeeferyanm analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT punmatthew analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT takasugijordanm analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT steinbergjeccar analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT goronalds analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT turnerbrandone analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 AT mahipalamit analysisoffemaleparticipantrepresentationinregisteredoncologyclinicaltrialsintheunitedstatesfrom2008to2020 |