Cargando…
Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Administrative databases provide valuable information for large-cohort studies. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an administrative database for resected gastric adenomas. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent endoscopic resection for benign gastric lesions w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941794 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.147 |
_version_ | 1785054572887146496 |
---|---|
author | Shin, Ga-Yeong Choi, Hyun Ho Park, Jae Myung Kim, Sang Yoon Park, Jun Young Kang, Donghoon Cho, Yu Kyung Kim, Sung Soo Choi, Myung-Gyu |
author_facet | Shin, Ga-Yeong Choi, Hyun Ho Park, Jae Myung Kim, Sang Yoon Park, Jun Young Kang, Donghoon Cho, Yu Kyung Kim, Sung Soo Choi, Myung-Gyu |
author_sort | Shin, Ga-Yeong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Administrative databases provide valuable information for large-cohort studies. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an administrative database for resected gastric adenomas. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent endoscopic resection for benign gastric lesions were collected from three hospitals. Gastric adenoma cases were identified in the hospital database using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10-codes. The non-adenoma group included patients without gastric adenoma codes. The diagnostic accuracy for gastric adenoma was analyzed based on the pathological reports of the resected specimen. RESULTS: Among 5,095 endoscopic resections with codes for benign gastric lesions, 3,909 patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 2,831 and 1,078 patients were allocated to the adenoma and non-adenoma groups, respectively. Regarding the overall diagnosis of gastric adenoma with ICD-10 codes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 98.7%, 88.5%, 95.2%, and 96.8%, respectively. There were no significant differences in these parameters between the tertiary and secondary centers. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative codes of gastric adenoma, according to ICD-10 codes, showed good accuracy and can serve as a useful tool to study prognosis of these patients in real-world data studies in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10244151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102441512023-06-08 Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection Shin, Ga-Yeong Choi, Hyun Ho Park, Jae Myung Kim, Sang Yoon Park, Jun Young Kang, Donghoon Cho, Yu Kyung Kim, Sung Soo Choi, Myung-Gyu Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Administrative databases provide valuable information for large-cohort studies. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an administrative database for resected gastric adenomas. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent endoscopic resection for benign gastric lesions were collected from three hospitals. Gastric adenoma cases were identified in the hospital database using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10-codes. The non-adenoma group included patients without gastric adenoma codes. The diagnostic accuracy for gastric adenoma was analyzed based on the pathological reports of the resected specimen. RESULTS: Among 5,095 endoscopic resections with codes for benign gastric lesions, 3,909 patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 2,831 and 1,078 patients were allocated to the adenoma and non-adenoma groups, respectively. Regarding the overall diagnosis of gastric adenoma with ICD-10 codes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 98.7%, 88.5%, 95.2%, and 96.8%, respectively. There were no significant differences in these parameters between the tertiary and secondary centers. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative codes of gastric adenoma, according to ICD-10 codes, showed good accuracy and can serve as a useful tool to study prognosis of these patients in real-world data studies in the future. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2023-05 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10244151/ /pubmed/36941794 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.147 Text en Copyright © 2023 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shin, Ga-Yeong Choi, Hyun Ho Park, Jae Myung Kim, Sang Yoon Park, Jun Young Kang, Donghoon Cho, Yu Kyung Kim, Sung Soo Choi, Myung-Gyu Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection |
title | Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection |
title_full | Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection |
title_short | Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection |
title_sort | accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941794 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shingayeong accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection AT choihyunho accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection AT parkjaemyung accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection AT kimsangyoon accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection AT parkjunyoung accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection AT kangdonghoon accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection AT choyukyung accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection AT kimsungsoo accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection AT choimyunggyu accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection |