Cargando…

Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Administrative databases provide valuable information for large-cohort studies. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an administrative database for resected gastric adenomas. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent endoscopic resection for benign gastric lesions w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Ga-Yeong, Choi, Hyun Ho, Park, Jae Myung, Kim, Sang Yoon, Park, Jun Young, Kang, Donghoon, Cho, Yu Kyung, Kim, Sung Soo, Choi, Myung-Gyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941794
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.147
_version_ 1785054572887146496
author Shin, Ga-Yeong
Choi, Hyun Ho
Park, Jae Myung
Kim, Sang Yoon
Park, Jun Young
Kang, Donghoon
Cho, Yu Kyung
Kim, Sung Soo
Choi, Myung-Gyu
author_facet Shin, Ga-Yeong
Choi, Hyun Ho
Park, Jae Myung
Kim, Sang Yoon
Park, Jun Young
Kang, Donghoon
Cho, Yu Kyung
Kim, Sung Soo
Choi, Myung-Gyu
author_sort Shin, Ga-Yeong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Administrative databases provide valuable information for large-cohort studies. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an administrative database for resected gastric adenomas. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent endoscopic resection for benign gastric lesions were collected from three hospitals. Gastric adenoma cases were identified in the hospital database using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10-codes. The non-adenoma group included patients without gastric adenoma codes. The diagnostic accuracy for gastric adenoma was analyzed based on the pathological reports of the resected specimen. RESULTS: Among 5,095 endoscopic resections with codes for benign gastric lesions, 3,909 patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 2,831 and 1,078 patients were allocated to the adenoma and non-adenoma groups, respectively. Regarding the overall diagnosis of gastric adenoma with ICD-10 codes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 98.7%, 88.5%, 95.2%, and 96.8%, respectively. There were no significant differences in these parameters between the tertiary and secondary centers. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative codes of gastric adenoma, according to ICD-10 codes, showed good accuracy and can serve as a useful tool to study prognosis of these patients in real-world data studies in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10244151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102441512023-06-08 Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection Shin, Ga-Yeong Choi, Hyun Ho Park, Jae Myung Kim, Sang Yoon Park, Jun Young Kang, Donghoon Cho, Yu Kyung Kim, Sung Soo Choi, Myung-Gyu Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Administrative databases provide valuable information for large-cohort studies. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an administrative database for resected gastric adenomas. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent endoscopic resection for benign gastric lesions were collected from three hospitals. Gastric adenoma cases were identified in the hospital database using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10-codes. The non-adenoma group included patients without gastric adenoma codes. The diagnostic accuracy for gastric adenoma was analyzed based on the pathological reports of the resected specimen. RESULTS: Among 5,095 endoscopic resections with codes for benign gastric lesions, 3,909 patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 2,831 and 1,078 patients were allocated to the adenoma and non-adenoma groups, respectively. Regarding the overall diagnosis of gastric adenoma with ICD-10 codes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 98.7%, 88.5%, 95.2%, and 96.8%, respectively. There were no significant differences in these parameters between the tertiary and secondary centers. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative codes of gastric adenoma, according to ICD-10 codes, showed good accuracy and can serve as a useful tool to study prognosis of these patients in real-world data studies in the future. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2023-05 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10244151/ /pubmed/36941794 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.147 Text en Copyright © 2023 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shin, Ga-Yeong
Choi, Hyun Ho
Park, Jae Myung
Kim, Sang Yoon
Park, Jun Young
Kang, Donghoon
Cho, Yu Kyung
Kim, Sung Soo
Choi, Myung-Gyu
Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection
title Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection
title_full Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection
title_fullStr Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection
title_short Accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection
title_sort accuracy of administrative claim data for gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36941794
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.147
work_keys_str_mv AT shingayeong accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection
AT choihyunho accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection
AT parkjaemyung accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection
AT kimsangyoon accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection
AT parkjunyoung accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection
AT kangdonghoon accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection
AT choyukyung accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection
AT kimsungsoo accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection
AT choimyunggyu accuracyofadministrativeclaimdataforgastricadenomaafterendoscopicresection