Cargando…
Multi-level predictors of being up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening
PURPOSE: Assessing factors associated with being up-to-date with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is important for identifying populations for which targeted interventions may be needed. METHODS: This study used Medicare and private insurance claims data for residents of North Carolina to identify...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37285065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01723-w |
_version_ | 1785145906094407680 |
---|---|
author | Lich, Kristen Hassmiller Mills, Sarah D. Kuo, Tzy-Mey Baggett, Chris D. Wheeler, Stephanie B. |
author_facet | Lich, Kristen Hassmiller Mills, Sarah D. Kuo, Tzy-Mey Baggett, Chris D. Wheeler, Stephanie B. |
author_sort | Lich, Kristen Hassmiller |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Assessing factors associated with being up-to-date with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is important for identifying populations for which targeted interventions may be needed. METHODS: This study used Medicare and private insurance claims data for residents of North Carolina to identify up-to-date status in the 10th year of continuous enrollment in the claims data and in available subsequent years. USPSTF guidelines were used to define up-to-date status for multiple recommended modalities. Area Health Resources Files provided geographic and health care service provider data at the county level. A generalized estimating equation logistic regression model was used to examine the association between individual- and county-level characteristics and being up-to-date with CRC screening. RESULTS: From 2012–2016, 75% of the sample (n = 274,660) age 59–75 was up-to-date. We identified several individual- (e.g., sex, age, insurance type, recent visit with a primary care provider, distance to nearest endoscopy facility, insurance type) and county-level (e.g., percentage of residents with a high school education, without insurance, and unemployed) predictors of being up-to-date. For example, individuals had higher odds of being up-to-date if they were age 73–75 as compared to age 59 [OR: 1.12 (1.09, 1.15)], and if living in counties with more primary care physicians [OR: 1.03 (1.01, 1.06)]. CONCLUSION: This study identified 12 individual- and county-level demographic characteristics related to being up-to-date with screening to inform how interventions may optimally be targeted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10244851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102448512023-12-02 Multi-level predictors of being up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening Lich, Kristen Hassmiller Mills, Sarah D. Kuo, Tzy-Mey Baggett, Chris D. Wheeler, Stephanie B. Cancer Causes Control Original Paper PURPOSE: Assessing factors associated with being up-to-date with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is important for identifying populations for which targeted interventions may be needed. METHODS: This study used Medicare and private insurance claims data for residents of North Carolina to identify up-to-date status in the 10th year of continuous enrollment in the claims data and in available subsequent years. USPSTF guidelines were used to define up-to-date status for multiple recommended modalities. Area Health Resources Files provided geographic and health care service provider data at the county level. A generalized estimating equation logistic regression model was used to examine the association between individual- and county-level characteristics and being up-to-date with CRC screening. RESULTS: From 2012–2016, 75% of the sample (n = 274,660) age 59–75 was up-to-date. We identified several individual- (e.g., sex, age, insurance type, recent visit with a primary care provider, distance to nearest endoscopy facility, insurance type) and county-level (e.g., percentage of residents with a high school education, without insurance, and unemployed) predictors of being up-to-date. For example, individuals had higher odds of being up-to-date if they were age 73–75 as compared to age 59 [OR: 1.12 (1.09, 1.15)], and if living in counties with more primary care physicians [OR: 1.03 (1.01, 1.06)]. CONCLUSION: This study identified 12 individual- and county-level demographic characteristics related to being up-to-date with screening to inform how interventions may optimally be targeted. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10244851/ /pubmed/37285065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01723-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Lich, Kristen Hassmiller Mills, Sarah D. Kuo, Tzy-Mey Baggett, Chris D. Wheeler, Stephanie B. Multi-level predictors of being up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening |
title | Multi-level predictors of being up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening |
title_full | Multi-level predictors of being up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening |
title_fullStr | Multi-level predictors of being up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-level predictors of being up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening |
title_short | Multi-level predictors of being up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening |
title_sort | multi-level predictors of being up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37285065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01723-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lichkristenhassmiller multilevelpredictorsofbeinguptodatewithcolorectalcancerscreening AT millssarahd multilevelpredictorsofbeinguptodatewithcolorectalcancerscreening AT kuotzymey multilevelpredictorsofbeinguptodatewithcolorectalcancerscreening AT baggettchrisd multilevelpredictorsofbeinguptodatewithcolorectalcancerscreening AT wheelerstephanieb multilevelpredictorsofbeinguptodatewithcolorectalcancerscreening |