Cargando…

Evaluation of Dentine Structure Loss after Separated File Retrieval by Three Different Techniques: An Ex-vivo Study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the success rate of retrieving separated instrument, the root canal volume changes using cone-beam computed tomography and the retrieval time using Ruddle's technique, Terauchi file retrieval kit (TFRK) and Endo Rescue kit. METHODS: Sixty human mandibular first molars wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdeen, Mohamed Ashraf, Plotino, Gianluca, Hassanien, Ehab El-Sayed, Turky, Mohammed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37257038
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.37929
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the success rate of retrieving separated instrument, the root canal volume changes using cone-beam computed tomography and the retrieval time using Ruddle's technique, Terauchi file retrieval kit (TFRK) and Endo Rescue kit. METHODS: Sixty human mandibular first molars were selected, and a 4-mm portion of #25/.04 rotary files were separated in the middle third of moderately curved mesio-buccal canals. Teeth were randomly assigned into three groups (n=20): R group, in which separated files were retrieved according to Ruddle's technique; T group, in which separated files were retrieved using TFRK and E group, in which separated files were retrieved using Endo Rescue kit. Values were analyzed using IBM SPSS. Results presented as mean±standard deviation and 95% confidence interval for the root canal volume and time and frequency (%) for success rate. Comparisons of differences in time, canal volume and success rate between groups were assessed. RESULTS: Retrieval was successful in R and T groups (70% and 80% respectively) without any significant difference between them (p=0.715), while E group hadn’t any successful samples (0.0%) with significant difference compared to R and T groups (p<0.001, p<0.001). E group showed the highest increase in canal volume followed by R group, while T group exhibited the lowest increase in canal volume. There was no significant difference in the mean retrieval time between R and T groups (p=0.815). CONCLUSION: TFRK provides a more conservative way for retrieval of separated instrument from the middle third of moderately curved canals.